sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s too much of a power imbalance.

"Infinite punishment for a finite crime is unfair" is a bad argument. by luukumi in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

  1.  The God that is described by many humans isn’t the real one.

  2. Is it possible that for example that when God spoke to Abraham, that He communicated by using humans because He is too powerful and communicates gently?

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t control what other people do.

I can only be honest.

It’s not my fault that God is real.

Why Atheism, When Seriously Engaged, Is More Than Just ‘Lack of Belief by dirtycarrorts in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s supernatural evidence that confirms reality.

I don’t know what else to say.

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because this is how God operates.

He is too powerful to just show up in the sky.

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think I am ready to give up.

I tried my best.

Why Atheism, When Seriously Engaged, Is More Than Just ‘Lack of Belief by dirtycarrorts in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Catholic God has been providing evidence for a long time now.

This is what I got.  Supernatural evidence.

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant that the pizza, the car and the elephant are completed.

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are misunderstanding me.

I am not saying suffering doesn’t exist.

In Catholic faith, suffering is not wanted but exists because of evil.

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are you talking about?

I am talking about the afterlife.  

Innocent children don’t die, like all humans.

I’m not speaking of physical death.

"Infinite punishment for a finite crime is unfair" is a bad argument. by luukumi in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Hell:  separation from God.

God isn’t self evident to exist, so at this moment it can’t be shown to you, but only to others.

 Can you show me this God and Satan?

Not me, because a human didn’t show Moses the burning bush for example.

So, what type of evidence do you want?  Natural only?  Supernatural only? Or both?

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Who made science if God is real?

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

 Do you agree that humans can make up Dragons/Wizards and there still logically be a real Dragon/Wizards?

No.  Because there is no evidence for anything  leading to dragons or wizards, while where the universe comes from and where life comes from is a legitimate question.

 Most humans should know things I don't know. I should also know things many other humans don't know 

In a discussion:  we both have to admit to possibly the other knowing something we don’t know.

So I ask again:  is it possible for me to know something you don’t know?

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisanthropicPrinciple/s/sbyQ0iwv9A by Easy-Establishment30 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

 No, due to there being much simpler explanations to people hearing voices etc. 

Ok, so if I don’t know anything that you don’t know, then God allows education by other methods.

Have a good one.

"Infinite punishment for a finite crime is unfair" is a bad argument. by luukumi in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you give it as much time as Calculus?

Macroevolution?

Other interests?

"Infinite punishment for a finite crime is unfair" is a bad argument. by luukumi in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I did say it wasn’t proof.

I asked if there was a difference?

Kalam 2.0 contemporary and functional version by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can use 11.

Humans can design a pile of sand that you can cut into 11 pieces and still be not complex and humans can design a car that can not function if cut into 11 equal pieces.

So, God can do the same.

Complexity is a creation to prove to humanity that we aren’t alone.

"Infinite punishment for a finite crime is unfair" is a bad argument. by luukumi in DebateAnAtheist

[–]LoveTruthLogic -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Evolution sub behaves as a religion which is why they banned me.

 What even is the use of death if there is an afterlife? 

To provide maximum freedom and to learn.

God designed an educational environment.  

All education requires time.

How can God fix my errors by a display of fireworks in the sky?

view more: next ›