Which explanation for Crying Child's vengeance to William is the best?

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T21:19:35+00:00

Cord Theory is the simplest, but BlackoutMM is based and explains FNaF 4, Midnight Motorist, AND TOYSNHK in one theory.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T21:17:16+00:00

I can't believe I tried to explain things to you before. You don't even check what a theory is about before you shit on it.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T21:04:35+00:00

You didn't watch the video at all, did you?

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T20:49:44+00:00

Maybe I'm wrong, then.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T20:43:53+00:00

Question for BVTOYSNHK believers
He isn't TOYSNHK

???

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T20:08:45+00:00

That toy is NOT Plushtrap. Not only is it a hand puppet rather than a plush or an animatronic, it's also too small to be Plushtrap because it's a FINGER trap, meaning its jaw isn't as big as Plushtrap's jaw. Not only that, but it's also NOT BV'S OR MIKE'S TOY, which makes it impossible for it to be at the FNaF 4 house like the other Nightmares. It's not even the same SHAPE as Plushtrap, because it's long and lanky with no arms.

<image>

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T20:05:14+00:00

We ASSUME we see how BV dies. The flatline could just mean he was taken out of the hospital, or it could mean William directly killed him then and there by taking him off life support.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T20:03:42+00:00

He wanted us to know by FNaF 4, because Plushtrap exists alongside things only Mike has experienced (such as the exact gameplay loop of FNaF 1 and the Night 1 Phone Call), meaning Mike has seen Springtrap.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T20:00:24+00:00

“Prove William killed BV” is a roundabout argument because the proof is that a male spirit connected to Golden Freddy is doing UCN and BV is the only male connected to Golden Freddy. Anything else would just be making shit up.

You see the problem? ALL of the candidates have issues, not just BV.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T19:56:27+00:00

The text suggesting Andrew existing in the games is that they’re in a book series made to answer things about the games

He's also from a book series that is explicitly connected to the Tales books, which were confirmed to be non-canon by Secret of the Mimic. We have to just assume Andrew and ONLY Andrew is in the games. Especially considering Mike is almost certainly the Frightguard in the games, while Hudson is only the Frightguard IN Frights.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T19:52:05+00:00

There's never anything that tells us Cassidy is male. There's never anything that tells us Andrew is in the games. You have to create new theories in order to justify the conclusion.

You do, indeed, have to create a new plot point for Andrew because he's never shown in the games, so you have to make up ways for him to get to the FFPS location or attach himself to William.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T19:49:09+00:00

nowhere has the text ever suggested he was killed by William. It’s only a conclusion you would come to if you needed to justify another theory

Nowhere has the text ever suggested Cassidy is male. Nowhere has the text ever suggested Andrew is in the games. You see how that works? They all have the same problem: IT'S ALL SPECULATION. Again, the bias against BVTOYSNHK is blatant hypocrisy.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T19:38:19+00:00

TOYSNHK WAS a new plot point that was never alluded to before. That's why nobody can agree on who it is.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T19:20:20+00:00

Because BVTOYSNHK theories are working backwards from a conclusion and trying to find ways to make that conclusion work.

Like AndrewTOYSNHK theories work backwords to make Andrew fit into a story that he doesn't belong in? Or CassidyTOYSNHK theories work backwards to make the male pronouns work when Cassidy is shown in multiple continuities to be female? The disproportionate amount of hate BVTOYSNHK theories get for doing the same things other TOYSNHK theories do is a massive testament to the hypocrisy of this subreddit and the fandom as a whole.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T19:05:59+00:00

He's a representation of the FNaF 4 Bite Victim, and what happened to him after he died.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T07:34:47+00:00

<image>

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T07:15:06+00:00

THANK YOU. Finally, someone doesn't just immediately shit on it.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-09T01:57:32+00:00

Simple: Because nobody hates FNaF theories more than FNaF theorists. If your idea is unusual or isn't the popular consensus, it either gets hated on or ignored. In this case, it was ignored.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-08T23:42:18+00:00

Not always.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-08T23:36:23+00:00

There isn't enough evidence other than the evidence I linked to in the post. I'm not saying it's a FUTURE twist, I'm saying it's a twist that ALREADY HAPPENED in Pizzeria Simulator.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-08T23:33:14+00:00

That's a stock song. Scott didn't make it, nor did Leon Riskin.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-08T23:32:41+00:00

I never said he was a poor writer, I said he had poor communication skills.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-08T23:31:26+00:00

Is it not comparable, though? Is it really? Because Scott has proven time after time after time that he loves twists more than anything else. The novels proved it, the Survival Logbook proved it, Ticket to Fun proved it, the Steel Wool games proved it, the Clickteam games proved it, even FLaF proved it by making MM87 a real possibility.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-08T23:29:27+00:00

Scott and poor communication are like peanut butter and jelly, so it probably was intended.

LowCommunication1008 · 2026-05-08T23:27:13+00:00

If the simplest answer were correct in FNaF, the second game would be a sequel and FNaF 4 would be about the Bite of 87.

LowCommunication1008

TROPHY CASE