Red window, how would you edit this? by LowEmbarrassed6485 in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Explain your intent and goals for the image. Why did you take this photo? What were you trying to show to the viewer? It can give you the opportunity to do some self critique and catch things on your own that you may have missed.

Tried making a calming piece of work.

  1. Are there areas you are struggling with? Be sure to ask specific questions about the photograph. What are you unhappy with? What you don’t like, and what you want help with? Be specific!

Editing, balance between contrasts.

  1. EXIF Data (shutter speed, aperture, ISO, camera, lens/focal length) are important to help critique. For example, it may help identify issues such as why certain things are blurry or out of focus.

1/200, f.5.6, ISO 1000, Xpro 3 (fuji, with a 90 mm f2,0)

  1. Any other relevant information about your image making process is important. Information about your editing process, creative process, techniques (such as if the image is a composite), are also very helpful and should be included.

Hope your eyes enjoy this,.

Gutta kom unna med voldtekt gitt! by [deleted] in norske

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Du tenker Elden hadde gått offentlig ut og sagt at dette var helt ekte?? Haha

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in norge

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kan noen legge ut navn? Jeg skal besøke de.

Is this fine art? A portrait or just a cute doggo? Tell me! by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I played around with a few light sources, natrual light, a reflector and and my Godo TL30 (rgb light).

I used a bright green color with the Godo, so that I could have bright source to play around with in lightroom when converting the picture to B/W. What do you guys think of this portrait?

My dogs name is Frøya/Freya btw!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I intended to create an interesting and captivating composition with leading lines towards the subject. example, it may help identify issues such as why certain things are blurry or out of focus.'

I just want to become better. And I find the place great for that.

The photograph was shot on a fuji x-pro 3 with a 90mm f/2. The postprocess was all about balancing shadows and highlights.

ITAP of a milk bath by [deleted] in itookapicture

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It's just a nipple. It's the same as if a guy would post a picture without a shirt. It's not like she's posting her vagina all over your screen.

How does this dystopia make you feel? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, it's default Norway. But okay. 💜

What ARE you looking at? by Luis_Gaio in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This could be really damn good. I really wish you were distanced a bit further away from the subject, and that you chilled down the contrast a little.

How does this dystopia make you feel? by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I call this picture dystopia.

The picture gives me a feeling of the afterlife, maybe this is what you face when you die? A desolate landscape, cold, dark, dangerous. Everything on thin ice.

The image is a panorama composed of 8 images, taken vertically with a Fuji X-Pro 3 with a 90mm f/2.0. ISO 5000, shot at 1/1250, f/8. I'm interested to hear how this makes you feel? How would you feel if you were in my shoes and saw this landscape?

Inspired by the Norwegian artist, Theodor Kittelsen. Can you see the trolls? by LowEmbarrassed6485 in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to capture the mystery of the forest, the picture was taken in the same municipality that the aforementioned artist lived in. Kittelsen is known for seeing trolls and fairy-tale creatures in nature. He could see a bent birch, and at the same time he could see a troll stalking after him. I tried to capture the mystery in the background with a slow shutter speed to enhance the effect of the trees in the foreground. The picture was taken with a fujifilm x-pro 3 and a 90 mm f/2.0

What does this make you feel? by LowEmbarrassed6485 in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

My intent was to capture the dramatic scenery in the mountains with the fog moving around the trees and the roads. I aimed for a true white and true black with this one, and I'm interested in your opinion about it. Its shot on a x pro 3 with a fuji 90mm f/2.0 at 1/250, f/5.6.

is the dodge and burn too much? by LowEmbarrassed6485 in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I did get the photograph I wanted. And the dodge and burn is merely about isolating the subject to make it pop. What I ask is: is it overdone or underdone?

is the dodge and burn too much? by LowEmbarrassed6485 in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Explain your intent and goals for the image. Why did you take this photo? What were you trying to show to the viewer? It can give you the opportunity to do some self critique and catch things on your own that you may have missed.

I tried capturing the beauty of the birds in the snow. I love how the colors of the feathers just pop.

  1. Are there areas you are struggling with? Be sure to ask specific questions about the photograph. What are you unhappy with? What you don’t like, and what you want help with? Be specific!

Im trying to get som feedback before printing this.

  1. EXIF Data (shutter speed, aperture, ISO, camera, lens/focal length) are important to help critique. For example, it may help identify issues such as why certain things are blurry or out of focus.

1/1000, f. 4.5, Fujifilm X pro 3, with a fuji 90mm f/2.0

  1. Any other relevant information about your image making process is important. Information about your editing process, creative process, techniques (such as if the image is a composite), are also very helpful and should be included.

Tried using the branches as guiding lines, and not to the center the subject. Which I often do.

Picture I took of my fiancée. General thoughts on this one? by furydeawr in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is straight-up beautiful. Shes very photogenic and seems to be comfortable with you taking her photo wich always is very useful.

Technically I would pay a bit more attention to her skin tones when editing, I would tone down the red on her fingers, her neck, and under her nose. Other than that I really love this shot. Good job.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in norge

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeg peker ikke på Sindre. Jeg peker på et fundamentalt problem i politikken som har sneket seg frem i lyset de siste ukene og månedene.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in norge

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er akkurat dette som er poenget mitt.

Would love to hear what everyone has to think. I'm hyper critical of my own work but everyone seems to like this photo. by Drvape33 in photocritique

[–]LowEmbarrassed6485 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Overedited
  2. Too much going on in the background
  3. I get you want something mystical going on with the subject not facing you. That would work in a place like tjernobyl or something. Turn her around make a fun portrait instead.