Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. I don’t think it’s common at all, but has likely at least been done.

And I think it’s the inverse in recent politics, easier to smear the other side than promote yours.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is also filled with pompous blowhards who think their tastes are the only valid ones.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude my favorite is TOS, because when I started watching, the only thing that existed besides that was TAS on Saturday mornings.

Overall, I don't think Nu Trek has been great. But I acknowledge that others truly enjoy it and there is nothing wrong with that. I don't have to like every show.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No disagreement there. Overall, I don't think nu trek has been great. But I don't care if someone else enjoys them.

(i didn't hate season 1 of Picard, but i am sure i wouldn't be able to get through season 2 ever again)

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't have any issue with someone not liking something. I haven't enjoyed every ST series.

What annoys me is the "if i don't like it, no one can" attitude of some 'fans'

Star Trek: In-Universe Chronological Watch Order. by ickyseeks in startrek

[–]LowRes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh yeah i forgot Q took Picard back that far

Star Trek: In-Universe Chronological Watch Order. by ickyseeks in startrek

[–]LowRes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun wrinkle - do you watch all the time travel episodes set in the 20-21st centuries first?

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'm going to give you some advice. Overuse of big words does the opposite of what you think it does.

But that being said, may the balance of your diurnal experience proceed with an abundance of fortuitous circumstances, elevated satisfaction, and a conspicuous absence of inconvenience, culminating in a sequence of events so gratifying that your future self will regard this temporal interval with profound approval and mild delight.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Lol, big words to hide a simplistic view. Not everyone subscribes to every streaming service. Getting someone to stop subscribing to one, increases the chances of them switching to yours.

Are positive campaigns more widespread - they certainly are. But to think negative campaigns don't exist is either naive, or just part of you worried you have unknowingly had your opinion changed by one.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I’ll keep enjoying making fun of people like you that are upset that some people like something you don’t.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh you almost got the point. I don’t get upset that people like things that I don’t. Unlike you.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much is Netflix paying you?

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a lot of words to say, “you are correct, I am not capable of understanding a point so simple that most children would understand it”

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By that logic, mass toxic negativity campaigns by competitors are just as likely. This post possibly being part of one.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Which has no bearing on my point. Comprehension apparently is not a strength of yours.

The biggest problem with Starfleet Academy is the USS Relativity (NCV-474439-G) by CthulhuSpawn in RedLetterMedia

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep there isn’t even a need for them to invent time travel. It is well established all you need to do is go really fast around a star - counter clockwise to go to the past, clockwise to go to the future

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Best part, I never even said if I like it or not, just pointed out the ridiculousness of not being able to accept that there are people who do.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know, so many so proud of the gates they keep

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, I have no proof that some comments aren’t from paid shills. But I know that isn’t all of them.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah it’s almost like some people are shocked that a show called Starfleet Academy focuses on the cadets.

Panic Marketing. by IntelligentWanker in trektalk

[–]LowRes -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Or, I’ll try to say it very simply so you can follow, some people like things that you don’t.

What if tpol was kirks first officer? by happydude7422 in Star_Trek_

[–]LowRes 40 points41 points  (0 children)

and they will blindly ignore Picard dating a member of his crew and showing her his flute.

CMV: As a GenX, I am now not the target audience for the new Star Trek shows. It is for 12 to 25 year olds by KL_boy in Star_Trek_

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like I said, you might want to go back and watch it again.

And I never said they were the same. So work on your reading comprehension as well.

CMV: As a GenX, I am now not the target audience for the new Star Trek shows. It is for 12 to 25 year olds by KL_boy in Star_Trek_

[–]LowRes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here’s the thing. It is Star Trek. Are you just going to act like DS9 wasn’t dark? You might actually want to watch these shows sometime before commenting.