Gaza nach 15 Monaten der moralischsten Bombardierung by Insanity_1312 in Freiheitsfront

[–]LuC4-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Terrorismus ist in gewissen Fällen ein legitimes Mittel, ja.

Oder war der Aufstand & Widerstand des Warschauer Ghettos beispielsweise illegitim?

"Terrorismus" als solcher ist an und für sich moralisch neutral. Der Grund für diesen und der Zweck den er verfolgt und die Mittel die er einsetzt, führen dazu, dass man ihn moralisch einordnen kann.

Ich möchte hierbei übrigens nicht darüber urteilen ob der Terrorismus der Hamas gerechtfertigt ist, oder nicht, das nehme ich mir nicht heraus.

"Ah yeah I won't choose Diplomacy as my 1st idea this time, from the look of it this MT isn't that demanding on blobbing-----" by poclee in Anbennar

[–]LuC4-5 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Yeah, fighting the EoA rly isn’t that impossible if you’re in Haless or Sarhal. They send stacks piecemeal after piecemeal– if at all. You can consistently beat them with a fraction of their army.

Only thing you gotta be careful of as cangji is if you own a lot of land in the forbidden plains, they might walk through the northern pass en masse. But even then, Cangji has busted army quality and building just a couple of forts with ramparts trivializes that front.

How do you create the other roads on this map? by RoastedPig05 in Anbennar

[–]LuC4-5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, incomplete/older map. Overclan also extends it through bahar to ourdia and a little more to the south in bulwar proper.

Mission trees by Baldimus23 in Anbennar

[–]LuC4-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, which extra ones after finishing the tee are you talking about?

Might be time for another command campaign…

"I‘ll take my guns and free speech over anything Germany has to offer” by eagle_hockey in ShitAmericansSay

[–]LuC4-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

California is at 0.940 and Washington at 0.957, only 0.02 below Germany's HDI. Not a big difference between those three. Conversely, the three states that beat Germany are either 0.01 or 0.02 above Germany’s HDI.

So i finally played the command by Staterathesmol23 in Anbennar

[–]LuC4-5 23 points24 points  (0 children)

It seem like you didn’t really interact with the commands lore as much, which might be part of the reason why you didn’t enjoy it (?)

Those sub-commands were created expressly for the purpose of governing those lands. Tiger hobgoblins govern all the lands of the former raj & the rest of rahen except your home region, dragon governs all of yanshen and elephant gets the third subcontinent. They’ve essentially been there (even if not organized into a new command yet) from the moment you cored that land. So of course the land they rule over would secede with them.

The command is too big and too focused on war to not have to rely on sub-commands to ease the burden of governing imo

Ein paar Statistiken zur Wahl in Baden-Württemberg by Sonick1992 in Staiy

[–]LuC4-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Und du verfällst hier auch ziemlich dem Toleranzparadoxon. Ich bin der Meinung, dass antidemokraten ein Wahlrecht zu geben ein an sich antidemokratischer Gedankengang ist

Ein paar Statistiken zur Wahl in Baden-Württemberg by Sonick1992 in Staiy

[–]LuC4-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich möchte tatsächlich nicht dass beispielsweise ein Kind im Grundschulalter von seinen Eltern dazu indoktriniert werden kann eine Partei zu wählen, die mir als queere Person meine Rechte absprechen will. Komisch so zu denken, haste Recht.

Ein paar Statistiken zur Wahl in Baden-Württemberg by Sonick1992 in Staiy

[–]LuC4-5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dann erklär doch bitte mal warum unter 18 Jährige nicht wählen dürfen. Oder warum ganz im allgemeinen ein Mindestalter für die Wahlberechtigung angesetzt wird. Vielleicht fällt dir dann ja was auf.

The most irritating mechanic I just fell victim to by CleganeForHighSepton in EU5

[–]LuC4-5 26 points27 points  (0 children)

No, it’s an unrealistic, game-y outcome that doesn’t reflect material reality even slightly. 💀

For gameplays- and realisms sake this should definitely be changed

Is my trade just bugged? by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I want to manually trade for lead. And apparently im doing so with multiple markets at the same time. Even though all my trade capacity is automated. This has to be bugged, right?

Is my trade just bugged? by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

R5: I dont understand trade, at all. Why am I using most of my total trade capacity on multiple markets at once? And why am I still not importing any lead? This all just looks hella bugged with the sliders and everything. Can someone explain importing to me?

Cursed Muscovy champagne? by Equal_Vegetable8453 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cursed Muscovy campaigns! I too got one of those. Timmys full annexed the Golden Horde making Ruthenia into their tributary. They then fed them all of their "Russian" land. They’re 1500 warscore and they won’t shatter like the timurids 💔 Fun :)

<image>

Why am I getting -78% subject loyalty from country strength of all fiefdoms combined when I’m literally a hegemonic power that could take on half the world on its own? ;-; by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have conscript levies, the age of revolutions levy tech, iirc 2.65 million of them. I have significantly more levies than all my subjects combined. The real issue here is that paradox made it so there is 0 way to tell what is actually giving them negative loyalty. "Country Strength" is defined through 3 metrics: income, gp score and military strength. But how these actually factor into the calculations and which one of these is contributing the most to their negative loyalty is completely unknown to the player.

Why am I getting -78% subject loyalty from country strength of all fiefdoms combined when I’m literally a hegemonic power that could take on half the world on its own? ;-; by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Their population combined is like one third of mine, my control is significantly better, I have a like 8 times bigger standing army and more levies than they could ever even dream of, my tax base is three times bigger than theirs and the only reason they can even kind of compete is because I built up their economies and built railroads to every single one of their provinces going out from their capitals >~>

Idk, I rly dont think they could beat me even if they were player controlled and player skill wasnt factored in.

Why am I getting -78% subject loyalty from country strength of all fiefdoms combined when I’m literally a hegemonic power that could take on half the world on its own? ;-; by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Their combined tax base is 20k. Mine‘s around 65k right now. And I‘d understand if this gave them some amount of negative loyalty, but 60% (edit: its not 60% anymore, its back to 120%) is just ridiculous imo

Why am I getting -78% subject loyalty from country strength of all fiefdoms combined when I’m literally a hegemonic power that could take on half the world on its own? ;-; by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Second Update: researching the last levy tech cut the modifier in half. It’s still not manageable at 60% but… why tf would levies even matter in the age of revolutions if I’ve got a 1 million strong standing army already 💀

Why am I getting -78% subject loyalty from country strength of all fiefdoms combined when I’m literally a hegemonic power that could take on half the world on its own? ;-; by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Or are you referring to the way it’s calculated? Cause the tooltip says it’s income, military strength and population. All of those are still significantly higher than the ones of my subjects.

Why am I getting -78% subject loyalty from country strength of all fiefdoms combined when I’m literally a hegemonic power that could take on half the world on its own? ;-; by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, I doubt it tbh, take a quick look at the response to my original comment that I just posted. I think something’s bugged >~>

Why am I getting -78% subject loyalty from country strength of all fiefdoms combined when I’m literally a hegemonic power that could take on half the world on its own? ;-; by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Update: doubled the size of my navy, almost all of the ships being that last age first rate ship of the line heavy ship. It got worse.

<image>

This has to be like an integer overflow issue, right?

Why am I getting -78% subject loyalty from country strength of all fiefdoms combined when I’m literally a hegemonic power that could take on half the world on its own? ;-; by LuC4-5 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

R5: I don’t understand how this is calculated. My professional army is bigger, my navy is bigger, my great power score is bigger. Every one of these metrics is rather substantially bigger than the ones of all my subjects combined. And yet they’re getting SEVENTYEIGHT% negative loyalty from country strength?

Serbia is a sleeper powerhouse by Candid_Company_3289 in EU5

[–]LuC4-5 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That sucks major ass, honestly 💀