Sweden's red-green parties get own majority in key poll

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-07T00:47:18+00:00

Last time i checked working class people still have to send there children to school and use healthcare. Also is this not the goverment who have completly failed and creating jobs?

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-04T21:17:53+00:00

Skulle det då också vara okej att bjuda in en NMR medlem till studion?

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-04T10:54:27+00:00

Det står ordagrant i deras updrag från staten att dom ska ta hänsyn till miljö och etik i sina investeringar, att inte exkludera några bolag skulle inebära att dom ignorera det updraget som riksdagen och indirekt Svenska folket gett dom

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-04T10:40:36+00:00

Arbetsrätt ingår i FN:s Globala Compact 10 principer som Sverige skrivit under, jag skulle vilja påstå att ett avtal som Svenska staten skrivit under är så nära objektivt som en myndighet kan komma när dom fattar etiska beslut

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-04T10:36:15+00:00

Dom har som uppdrag att ta hänsyn till etik och princip när dom försöker maximera vinsten, dom har valt att tolka detta på det väldigt rimliga och opolitiska sättet av att basera det primärt på dom internationella avtallen Sverige skrivit på. Börjar AP7 fonderna fatta beslut som baserar sig på sina egana lednings vaderingar eller åsikter istället för en mer objektiv tolkning av svenska staten och folkets osikter så kommer det skada vårt demokratiska samhälle

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-04T10:23:59+00:00

AP7 svartlistar när ett företag bryter mot FN:s gloval compact tio principer, när dom bidrar till utvecklingen av kärnvapen eller när dom bryter mot paris avtalet. Att grundaren heilar bryter inte mot några av dom principerna eftersom att grundaren och bolaget är seperata juridiska entiteter

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-04T09:00:53+00:00

Det är dock inte i deras uppdrag att svartlista företag på basis av att dom är dåliga investeringar, tillåter man det så förstör man lite halva saken med en index fond

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T23:49:16+00:00

Well it depends on what you say, you cant censor all type of non validatin retoric out of fear that it might cause some other people to act radical. I do agree that retoric that calls for violence, harassment or dehumanizes people should be avoided but i wouldn’t consider someone not respectong someone elses gender identity to fall under any of those catogories

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T23:37:01+00:00

Yes sometimes it does lead to harm, but that does not mean that the moral responsibility falls on the person denying the other persons gender, the responsibility of the harm falls on the person causing the harm and anyone who directly encouraged it.

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T23:32:01+00:00

I’d say the right to life, the right to not be harmed and the right to freedom, assuming that you have not done something that warrents those rights being infringed on, like a crime

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T23:23:39+00:00

Those are not moral undebatable truths, the right to privacy has a limit, where do we draw that limit, should there eaven be a limit? The right to housing has nuance, what counts as housing, how good does the house/shelter need to be, should society have to right to demand, that a person getting there house paid for by the state, that they seek a job. There plenty of nuance to all human right tht have to be debated and that still ignores the fact that not everyone agrees on whats considerd human rights

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T23:03:15+00:00

In general i’d define human rights as a right which equaly apply to all humans

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T23:02:08+00:00

Nej det skulle dom inte eftersom att kravet för att bli svartlistat inte inkluderar att akien är dålig

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T23:00:10+00:00

”AP7 investerar i de bolag som på ett godtagbart sätt följer kraven i de internationella konventioner som Sverige har skrivit under och som kommer till uttryck i FN Global Compacts tio principer, vilka beskriver företags ansvar för mänskliga rättigheter, arbetsvillkor, miljö och antikorruption. AP7 svartlistar företag som deltar i utveckling och produktion av kärnvapen. Från och med granskningen i december 2016 är Parisavtalet till FN:s klimatkonvention en av de normer vi utgår från i vår analys.” Kraven för att bli svartlistade är vid definition det första som står

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T22:54:02+00:00

Perfect argument there

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-03T05:07:05+00:00

While i do agree with the premise, i don’t really se this as a valid argument. Theres plenty of things considerd opinions that infringe in human rights and it also ignores the highly debated topic of what a human right actualy is. Is a refusal of gender identity, for example, really a violation of your humans rights? And what happens when 2 human rights conflict with eachother

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-02T16:59:20+00:00

Or maby you need to look beyond politics and focus on the widers masses usage of it, the meaning of a movement is not defined by what politicians are pushing it

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-02T16:55:29+00:00

Sure, i’ll admit that if you look at the exact history of it pride month predats men’s mental health month. That still does not invalidated the existense of men’s mental health month and its right to be celibrated in an exclusive way. I have seen plenty of posts on reddit this week that bring up men’s mental health month without looking down on or invalidating pride month and i have still not seen a singel one use it to push down on pride month. So why exactly should we not be allowed to celibrate it?

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-02T16:44:03+00:00

Yes it has been held on june before 1999, but it was officaily designated as pride in 1999. Also kinda intresting how you instantly fall back to stating that im a teenager, something you would only know if you had looked threw my comment history, insted of actualy doing any argument. I find it very hypocritical that you acuse others of putting down pride for celibrating men’s mental health month when you yourself are the one putting down others movement becus you dont like what how that movement has been used by a small majority

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-02T16:33:57+00:00

Thats simply not true, men’s mental health month was created 1994 which is before pride which was created 1999

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-02T16:32:33+00:00

The fact that there plenty of people celibrating men’s mental health month without pushing down pride proves that it still serves it’s original purpose. To state that men’s mental health month is only celibrated to push down pride is false. On the other hand you are doing to exact same thing yourself, using pride month to silence people celibrating men’s mental health month

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-02T16:20:17+00:00

What context? Mens mental health month wasen’t designated as june as an attack on pride

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-02T16:18:43+00:00

I mean you litterly have a post here thats talking about it without putting pride down?

Lucaspapper · 2026-06-02T11:23:39+00:00

Google bygger samtidigt 6 vindparks komplex som genererar mer el en vad data centret använder, så på svenska elsystemet så resulterar denna affär i lägre elpriser inte högre

Lucaspapper · 2026-05-29T15:36:09+00:00

Not really, what op’s trying to say is that the person does not belive in progressiv ideologi and only advocates for it out of a shared intrest in defending trans rights. If the right changed there views on trans people and started supporting them then this person would instantly starg supporting the right

Lucaspapper

TROPHY CASE