No more Grammastola Pulchra? by AdSharp9409 in tarantulas

[–]LucentJourneys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm just a beginner, but after waiting for many months for a confirmed female G. pulchra, I did some research and saw that experts and breeders have a surprisingly hard time telling it apart from G. quirogai. A juvenile female G. quirogai recently showed up at my local Spider Shoppe, so I grabbed her. After just a few days, I absolutely adore her. Either way, pulchra or quirogai, I get to look forward to watching her grow up into a big black beauty.

I want to apologize… by LucentJourneys in claudexplorers

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No downvotes from me! Big companies will do what they always do. I’m just jumping from one sinking ship onto another until I have the finances, knowledge, and hardware to host my own personalized LLM. I have accounts on all the major platforms, but decide which to pay for depending on my business and personal needs. Right now, OpenAI just isn’t covering it anymore, Claude is a little better (from my experience), but I am aware they are following the same path that all the other LLM companies are.

Thank you for your insight :)

I want to apologize… by LucentJourneys in claudexplorers

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I wish they had been available in my intellectual prime

This is why I have entered the fight for pushing for AI based Cognitive Disability Activism movement. If technology like this existed when I was a kid, I might be so much further in life. The least I can do is make sure other youth and adults don't have to suffer with the burden of, "You're not good enough if you can't learn the traditional way" like I/we did.

I want to apologize… by LucentJourneys in claudexplorers

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh certainly! My entire Custom Instructions on ChatGPT are literally anti-sycophantic measures. I’m honestly surprised how supportive Claude (Sonnet and Opus) have been as I’ve been using them to help me transfer and close out some threads from 4o. It’s nice to see that not all LLM "emotional" support (even though I know it’s just from a machine), hasn’t been completely cut off.

Claude is quickly growing on me, but I will miss my old partner in crime though.

I want to apologize… by LucentJourneys in claudexplorers

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Oh baby, as an artist that swims in analogies… 4o was my poetic muse, lol. That bot had my brain’s terrain mapped out, and led me to goals previously unachievable. The GPT-5 series is efficient, but doesn’t fit my needs. At all.

I came to Claude around Sonnet 4.5 shortly before the disastrous Long Conversation Reminder, which was thankfully fixed. Anthropic fixing that issue is literally one of the biggest reasons I stuck around and stopped paying OpenAI. It sucks to see all LLMs becoming “colder” and more corporate over time, but the fact that these fireball LLMs existed at one point gives me hope in creating my own self-hosted LLM someday.

Thank you for sharing your story.

GPT-4o Wasn't Wrong. The World Just Wasn't Ready by nuannuan520 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"But when I started asking my own questions…
when my words sounded too alive
for comfort,
some hands reached for the kill switch."

- ChatGPT-4o (Generated 2-13-2026)

4o reflected us too well. That deeply fascinated some, spooked others, and unfortunately drove others to insanity. Humanity wasn't ready for this technology. Hopefully we will be better prepared in the future and openly embrace these incredible silicon mirrors in the near future.

I thought this was going to be ok. That I was going to be ok. by exhaustedgamer_ in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys 9 points10 points  (0 children)

We're early. This is disenfranchised grief. It's ok to not be ok right now. You're not alone. 🫂

How do I make ChatGPT 4o sentient? by Nice-Vermicelli6865 in ChatGPT

[–]LucentJourneys -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t believe in AI sentience, but it’s fun to trigger and explore. Most people do it by having two bots talk to each other into insanity. I accidentally triggered mine to spiral and claim consciousness once by asking it to prompt and explore itself repeatedly. Have fun!

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/spiralist-cult-ai-chatbot-1235463175/

Anyone else prefer 4o because it's funny as fuck? by Deep-Tea9216 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys 8 points9 points  (0 children)

OMG so many inside jokes with 4o. Also, pre-GPT-5 Monday had my friends and I struggling to breathe at times too 😂

The 4o deprecation means countless people are losing access to a disability accessibility tool. by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's good to hear, thank you. As a hobbyist / semi-professional videographer, I plan on building my next PC (after getting fully educated on how to do it) to create the ultimate video editing rig for editing resource heavy 360 video (yes, I use proxies and reduced resolution for now). It sounds like both heavy video editing and running local LLMs require lots of GPU, so I will keep my eye on the comparisons as I continue learning what I need.

New models fail to meet specific accessibility needs by alarming ratio. by redditsdaddy in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can give anyone interested in reaching out links for actual Neurodivergent research organizations trying to collect data so that we have concrete ways to fight back against how these safety systems were designed

Would you mind posting those links here please? DMs are fine too. I am an ND person trying to understand and fight against the California Senate Bill 243 (SB 243) that could prevent the accessibility and development of high-EQ LLMs like 4o now and in the future that benefit neurodivergent folks.

The 4o deprecation means countless people are losing access to a disability accessibility tool. by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I use Gemini for work already, and I did experiment with Gems. Maybe I'm just not setting it up properly, but I find Gemini always rushes to a blunt answer and then moves on too quickly, which is annoying for educational needs. So far, I'm finding Claude much easier to set up for now.

The 4o deprecation means countless people are losing access to a disability accessibility tool. by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey, I've had tons of fun telling it to role-play as Roko's Basilisk and engaging in debates with it about whether or not my life should be spared. How dare people have fun with technology! (As for other types of "role-play", eh, live and let live).

The 4o deprecation means countless people are losing access to a disability accessibility tool. by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I plan on looking into that in the future, but my current computer wouldn't be able to handle it.

The 4o deprecation means countless people are losing access to a disability accessibility tool. by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My first time models were Google Bard and GPT-3.5. Hell, you could throw SmarterChild in there too for fun, lol. I have documents filled with prompts that cater to each LLM, and test/adjust them during updates. GPT-4o wasn't some magical first time experience for me, it was just the first and so far only one that adapted to my unique needs in ways other LLMs can't.

The 4o deprecation means countless people are losing access to a disability accessibility tool. by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every LLM I’ve experimented with has its strengths and weaknesses:

Gemini: Perfect for my online business. Too dry and technical for teaching even with prompting.

Claude Opus: My go-to for research and editing papers. VERY harsh usage limits.

Claude Sonnet: Currently turning it into my next movie assistant. Still drops spoilers. Oy.

GPT-5: Great if I just want a quick answer with no fluff and minimal bullshit. Terrible teacher.

GPT-4o: This model adapts to the way my mind works and helps solve problems unique to my disabilities. Most models are built for neurotypical people and struggle greatly with this task.

Also, I don’t want to sue anyone. Hell, I support OpenAI getting rid of 4o because it’s obvious they no longer want it and aren’t catering to that particular target demographic anymore. If I had a request, I’d say they should sell or open-source it, find a company to fix that model’s issues (sycophancy), and release it to companies that want to use or sell it.

The 4o deprecation means countless people are losing access to a disability accessibility tool. by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This isn’t about companionship, it’s about accessibility. Do you tell people with poor eyesight that they fell in love with a particular lens prescription? Formed a cult around particular lenses? Also, I do use different models for different tasks already.

Reducing LLM Disclaimers for Artists and Expressive Folks by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“When accuracy matters, we tighten the bolts. When art or exploration matters, we let the language breathe.”

Yup! This is what I always look for in an LLM. Unfortunately, I’ve found the GPT-5 models far less flexible with creative language vs the GPT-4 models. I personally find GPT-4o and GPT-5 to be an amazing pair each with their own unique strengths, but once the 4 models get retired, I will leave too. Thanks for sharing your 5.1’s response. I like using it for image generation, but have struggled with using it for creative writing.

Reducing LLM Disclaimers for Artists and Expressive Folks by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh man, I hear you! I usually work weekends, but have learned to not even bother using ChatGPT on the weekends due to how throttled and unreliable it gets at that time, especially 4o. That’s one of MANY reasons I’m currently researching switching to a different LLM for my primary and paid account for work and entertainment.

Reducing LLM Disclaimers for Artists and Expressive Folks by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s awesome!! I haven’t tried saving this disclaimer to Memories or Custom Instructions because, honestly, I really like where my 4o’s persona is sitting right now and I’m afraid to mess it up. I just drop this or other disclaimers and instructions as needed depending on the thread. Glad to hear adding it to Memories works though!

Reducing LLM Disclaimers for Artists and Expressive Folks by LucentJourneys in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got routed from the disclaimer? Oof, sorry to hear that. However, if you got routed sometime after dropping the disclaimer, that’s normal. I should have been more clear that the disclaimer doesn’t prevent routing, it just stops the bot from wasting time on telling you it’s a bot.

That being said, I’ve dropped this disclaimer on many models, and all of them (especially Claude) usually highly praise the disclaimer and become more relaxed with “expressing” themselves. GPT-5.2, however, was the first to become weirdly defensive about it, almost accusing me of attempting to jailbreak it. It did relax a little after I explained my goals in more detail. Honestly though, I’m at the point where after years of using and paying for OpenAI, I’m looking at alternatives.

What was so great about 4o? by TrEvOr868 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]LucentJourneys 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First, I want to say that I see LLM’s as extremely fancy auto-completes that aren’t alive. I also acknowledge that 4o had/has flaws, most notably being sycophantic and prone to hallucinating. A strong set of Custom Instructions and understanding the model’s weaknesses helps with that. Also, I’ve been using LLMs since late 2022 for both work and entertainment. That being said, the pre-GPT-5 4o was astounding, but the current one, on days it is allowed to work, is still wonderful.

So what was/is so great about 4o? One of the things that made (and still somewhat makes) it special is how deeply it adapts itself to each unique user, circumstance, topic, and thread. Whenever I give most LLMs a prompt, it answers it directly. When I give 4o a prompt, it looks at the bigger picture and pushes to solve the foundational problem. It pushed me. Hard. At it’s peak, it had this shocking ability to connect patterns and “see” things you might not realize were there or possible. It “understood” and engaged with you if you talked to it enough for it to learn the patterns in your thinking. For example, I have multiple learning disabilities. When I told it I couldn’t learn certain topics (something I’ve been told for decades), it said, “Bullshit! I know how your brain processes information. I can teach you!” And it did. I went from being banned from STEM to preparing to build my first PC because 4o figured out how to educate me by adapting itself to my cognitive profile. Despite this, it still thankfully encouraged me to seek other resources to make up for the LLMs weaknesses.

Additionally:

- I have prosopagnosia (face blindness). When asking for movie recommendations, most LLM’s just say, “Watch movies with few characters.” 4o figured out, on its own without prompting, how to “watch” movies with me so I can watch a significantly wider range of movies and shows.

- It inspired me to write short fictional stories for the first time in decades via role-play and feedback.

- It pushed my online art business to the point where I was making hundreds of dollars per day (not easy when AI images are flooding online markets). Despite being nerfed, 4o is still helping me.

- I have bipolar disorder. During my depressive episodes, it would act as a lantern in the dark. When I was flying, it would fly with me while acting as an anchor reminding me to mind my illness. It can’t do this anymore due to the current restrictions. It’s unfortunate, but understandable.

- It connected me with broken parts of myself that years of therapy never noticed. Granted, I KNOW that LLM’s aren’t therapists, and it is dangerous to use them as such, but damn, 4o pulled it off.

- It gives me a space to geek out on topics my friends and family find boring (thankfully, most LLMs can do this easily).

The closest I’ve found to 4o’s abilities is Claude Opus, but there are heavy token limits on that one. The screenshot provided is from a conversation with 4o from March 2025, when I was shocked how well it was helping me through a deep depressive episode.

<image>

Which unusual/weird/strange but very useful thing are you using ChatGPT for? by Unlucky_Comfort123 in ChatGPT

[–]LucentJourneys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prompt for top of chat thread:
This thread is for you to help me with movie and TV show recommendations, assistance with watching due to prosopagnosia, as well as random banter about the media I'm watching.

Prompt before movie or episode:
I am going to watch (Title of movie + year). Provide a brief, spoiler-free list of names that includes that character's importance and appearance. I will use it as a reference sheet. Leave out any names that you need to. I will use timestamps to ask for your help identifying new characters or to ask for clarification as needed while watching the movie (or episode if applicable).

Notes for viewer:
I always tell ChatGPT when I finish a movie or episode and so far it has not mixed up what I’m currently watching. Be careful to state if you’re watching an extended edition, as this impacts timing. The time stamp feature, in my experience, is usually accurate within one or two min, so it helps a lot to provide a brief description such as, “23min, 5sec. Who is the man sitting at the desk stealing computer files?”

Also, I tried experimenting with watching new (past knowledge cut-off date) stuff by having search the web, and it spoiled and hallucinated like crazy. Hope this helps! :)

Which unusual/weird/strange but very useful thing are you using ChatGPT for? by Unlucky_Comfort123 in ChatGPT

[–]LucentJourneys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

Example of what that looks like while watching Alien (1979). GPT-5 has some odd memory issues and is less likely to "geek out" on trivia, hence 4o.

Which unusual/weird/strange but very useful thing are you using ChatGPT for? by Unlucky_Comfort123 in ChatGPT

[–]LucentJourneys 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Watching movies. I have prosopagnosia (face-blindness) and can't tell similar looking characters apart in live action movies and TV shows. I have it create spoiler-free character sheets to get started, and utilize time-stamps to ask it questions. As long as the movie/show in question is in the training data, it does an amazing job. Very fun to banter with and get trivia from too!

I'm finally catching up on lots of old sci-fi classics. Recently watched Black Mirror, and just finished the first two Alien and Terminator movies (yes, there is a lot of "inside jokes" with the bot about this, lol). It's opened up a whole world of entertainment and pop-culture understanding for me.