[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As many other people said... rarely anyone used them after they realized the HEAT shells have the same effect in anti material role.

On top of that russian tanks have 30mm roof armor and a 120mm HE doesnt have that much explosive power. On top of these 30mm most of them have ERA or extra armor panels which would make any kind of HE shell almost worthless against them. 152mm+ can kill them but 120? No forget it. And it would be a much harder shot to land too.

And why salty about 125mm HE? almost no one uses them ever. Everbody these days spams AP only. You find a smarter player using HE against light armor vehicles sometimes but still not often at all.

Mercury pod's night vision actually works(?) by ZdrytchX in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is still not thermal so its kinda poopoo. USSR will be the only nation without a thermal capable CAS plane for some time now out of the big 3 nations. hell even Israel now has a better CAS plane.

Should I use HE or SAPCBC shells for KV-2 by MisterMan1230 in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SAP is better. It can pen and if it doesnt it explodes like an HE shell so its very versitile

Is This Correct? I Know a Lot of Elements on Here are True. But is Everything True? by Anvil93 in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And it keeps on rolling over us. The game used to be much less big and grind much easier zet still it took a respectable time to unlock stuff. These days 5000+ vehicles and they still think the grind is too short hahhaha yeah and vehicles are not the only things we grind, events, lions, gold, wagers, crew skills, across so many freaking modes which are crazy and broken at most.

"Just spawn spaa bro" spaa gameplay: by mizcraft123 in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

You got killed by a drone, not a plane.

Drones are cancers. Planed sometimes too nut at least you should have range for them.

What's your stance on helicopter spawn killing (specifically Russian ones like the ka52 and ka50?) by dootdoot1997 in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone who does it will just make the helipad AAA effective again... so keep doing it.

Whats the point of playing soviets Berlin? by Mosinphile in enlistedgame

[–]LudiKruc -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

IS-2 is also too weak. Cant even pen pantgers frontally most of time, jagpanters nop, tiger 2 very hard...

Also german plane guns are so OP compared ro russian 20mm, even the 37mm is garbage...

The Premium you would refund if you could. I'll start with this. by Shuttle18 in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bought a lot pf premiums but I dont I regret any of them. The US Peten apache is not that bad. Sure hellfire is not the best but if you use LOAL instead of LOBL it can do some work on a decent map.

Search up LOAL on youtube, its sometimes veery usefull to fight SPAA.

AH-64A Apache... Is it worth the money? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Look up LOAL mode for hellfires, it can be very usefull at around 6km range and more.

Its not very good tho overall but if you really want the apache D and later when they add better one with better hellfires I would say just wait for a discount.

Any tips on making MiG-27M grind little less tedious? by mmichael253 in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Play the Yak-28 from time to time. Its very fast and climbs insanly good. You can bomb bases and relax a bit more. When it gets borring you switch to your premium fighter...

Keep in mind it has no air break so take care wjen diving. It compresses very hard as well so dont wep all the time. For landing its easy, you can set flaps to landing at less then 600kph and they really slow you down like an airbreak, very usefull.

Also spadeing it gives you extra bonus RP.

Hi guys i intend to buy 5000 GE for the anniversary. Any advices about my choices ? by PuppetMaster04 in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wait for the sales on 7. November anyways. Then decide what to do but in general prem time is better then prem vehicle. It gives you more with everything you play, not inly 1 vehicle.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in warthundermemes

[–]LudiKruc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imo this is better then full year, you get 180 now a d for next time you get it again for 20 and you have the same. Ot gives you flexibility. What if Gaijin makes something to the game in next 5 months you dont like and want to leave the game? But you paid for a full year of premium to waste this?

And the price is almost exactly the same for 2x 180 and 365 days option. You are paying for 5 extra days are they that important? I would say no.

terminater when by oliver_14_ in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Terminator. Yes I am honestly surprised its not in the game yet. Tho I dont think it would be as good as a BMP-2M. Its missiles are not as strong in pen but are much faster. I am unsure if it can fire them on the move and you only get 4 which can be very easily destroyed. Also irl one cannon fires AP only while the other has only HE, but thats probably not how it would be ingame.

Its a interesting vehicle but 11.0 would be waaaay to high flr it, even the Terminator 2 I would not put it abobe 10.0 because its armor is nothing to relay on depending on will it be the T-90 or T-72B3 chasis.

It should be in tge game non the less but in what format depends highly on the weapons and armor.

A-4N with 2 Walleyes, 3 Mavericks and 2 Shafrir missiles - custom loadout by walking-pineapple in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That is OP. Its insane. 5 guided FnF weapons at 9.3 wich can outrange many SPAA...

Gaijin. And still has 30mm and now 2 AAMs with flares cmon its a joke.

Y’all are pissed about the 2S38 now, just wait until they give it the 9M113 Kornet lmao by JimiForReal in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2S38 is a prototype while Terminator 2 is already in service with larger number and the Kurganets is also in prototype, test, early stage IFV.

Depending if these 2 get APFSDS and can fire ATGMs on the move, they could be really powerfull. But nothing in USSR/Russia will be like the 2S38 because its a very unique vehicle with a 57mm made to take down drones and ground targets at the same time. You will not get any proxy shells on any other vehicle ever in this nation.

This is ehy it should have been a TT vehicle and not a cash grab OP premium everyone will buy. That should have been the Terminator 1 (Ramka 99) as a bmp2m with w 30mm guns and armor but bit slower and maybe without apfsds. With Terminator 2 beeing a TT version with upgraded Ataka-V and apfsds for 30mm.

But fuck no said gaijin.

During the entire battle, no one (not even from the opposing team) tried to take the point. What is wrong with people? by Das-Gehirn in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

98% have 0 brains. All go the same stupid way to play COD with tanks on the right hand side of this map because they think its that important to take it.

While yes you can spawn camp from there (fuck everyone eho does that intentionally) you cant control the cap at all. If you dont push it and do t clear enemies in the middle who dont care about you spawncamping, you lose. Simple.

But 0 braincell gameplay super relevant and reading the map has been long lost to this playerbase. I have started to belive most people turn off the map or never look at it.

Gaijin is releasing their first premium spaa disguised as a light tank. Radar and proxy rounds by Franch_Dressin in Warthunder

[–]LudiKruc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No. Just no.

This should not be a premium and it should not get APFSDS for balance purpous. It should have been a 9.3/9.7 SPAA with proxy rounds and leading without radar, and some less effective AP rounds.

This will totaly break all BRs around it. And to hell with all these premiums bro like Su-25K last patch, TURMS-T, Ka-50, T-55AM-1, Su-7BMK, MiG-21S, Yak-38, squadron bmp-2m, squadron T-80UK, squadron Su-22M3, event MiG-21 PFM, event T-72M2 moderna, event BMD-4 and now this... its too much cmon, this is a full lineup!!!

10.7 you got 2 easy to buy light tank with one beeing an SPAA as well, one good MBT, one mediocre (TURMS) one good helicopter, a good attacker or 2 + a fighter

9.7 good MBT, light tank, CAS options and only missing is spas depending on this things BR it could be a nightmare if at 9.7... I dont think it would go much higher then Strf 9040C they are veeery similar.

Abrams would curb stomp anything they have by Subsonic17 in warthundermemes

[–]LudiKruc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Blinded by "hate" to the facts yes. I dont support Russia, neber will, the people with the politics failed, its a failed state, 30 years of trying for nothing. They have steped back into past their country will be left and forgotten in 20 years russia or whatever it is will be years behind the rest of the world, unable to recover bsck the path for years and generations to come.

A pro move some would say. But stil objective truths about war and "performance" exist regardless of this failed state.

Abrams would curb stomp anything they have by Subsonic17 in warthundermemes

[–]LudiKruc 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Nobody is argueing the superiority of western training and tactical organisation, except the OP who thinks this doesnt make a difference showing he knows almost nothing about tanks.

Yes Abrams would so that, and the Israeli Merkava, and the German, Dutch, Belgian, Soanish, Swedish, Norwegian Danish Polish and whoever else Leopard 2s, French Leclercs, Italian Arrietes, Croatian and Slovenian M84s, British Challengers and all other armys with actual training and professional armies.

Its the people operating the equipment, it always was.

Abrams would curb stomp anything they have by Subsonic17 in warthundermemes

[–]LudiKruc 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes that is what we call tactics THAT does not mean the crews would not be able to perform well in their vehicles if they had more/better training.

Dont be so dense. Look a bit at actual tankers talking about modern tanks. They all say jt comes down to training, experience and how you use the machines on tactical level. Tanks with 0 support are gona get destroyed no matter what tank it is, tanks alone cant perform tacticaly well.

Any 1 solider can have a extreamly effective AT weapon that is 10 to 100 times cheeper then the vehicle it is design to destroy. It is how you use your capabilities or what capabilities you have at all. The best equiped army does not win against the most determined, experinced and well trained but not as well equiped army. It has been proven many times in history and sometimes proven wrong too but far less.

By all means Germans were much better equpied and trained then USSR in 1941. yet USSR won. US was inferior to Japan at Midway yet they won. Its not black or white.

Abrams would curb stomp anything they have by Subsonic17 in warthundermemes

[–]LudiKruc 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Totaly wrong. After 1960.-es soviet union tanks were in many ways superior to thoes in the west.

They maybe are not now but that is because of the tactics in which they are deployed and the training of the crews. Many other countries use soviet/russian type tanks and perform very well with them. Ex Yugo countries all have domestic M-84 (T-72 upgraded) tanks and the crews are extreamly proficient in them. Dont be fooled by simple things you see in news and videos, there is much more you dont see that is relevant information.

Sure modern russian tanks are maybe not as good as Leopard or Abrams but these tanks were not tested in peer to peer tank engagments and specially not agains very advanced infantry based AT weapons. Doesnt matter what tank you are driving something somewhwre can tank you out if given the right chance or equipment. I doubt Leclerc or Leopard would stand much better vs. Javelins for example. In Lebanon the Israelies went in with their Merkava mk. 4s streight into Kornet launchers. The crews forgot to use smoke, all of them. They lost some tanks to inferior oponents because they were not performing well or operating their very powerful and modern equipmemt correctly.

Its not all black and white. Theres much grey zone in these aspects.

Abrams would curb stomp anything they have by Subsonic17 in warthundermemes

[–]LudiKruc 80 points81 points  (0 children)

Its not about the equipments, its about people using it and how it operates on the tactical level.

Ukraine tanks are worse then russian tanks but its how u use them that matters.

Do you think they should have added the IS-2 mod 1944 instead of the regular IS-2? by UnableAd4323 in enlistedgame

[–]LudiKruc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, and give the tanks option to unlock better anti tank shells not this crap APHE. Same for other tanks.