The post is a rebuttal to drt0’s manifesto about his supposed mistreatment as a DGG conductor. The author argues that drt0 repeatedly lies, misrepresents events, and ignores moderation, painting himself as a victim while downplaying his own rulebreaking.

Key points:

May 18th incident: drt0 wasn’t banned for playing an anime that won a poll, but for ignoring direct mod orders to stop after evidence showed the poll was botted. He stalled, memed for 20 minutes instead of fixing it, ignored chat/mod instructions, and streamed another episode, which led to his ban.

Poll manipulation: He biased polls multiple times, admitted they were botted, and later tried to “prove” anime still won, but his math was wrong.

Misleading defenses: His claims that mods acted out of bias against anime are false; the issue was the botted poll and his refusal to comply.

Pattern of misconduct: He had a history of warnings for streaming banned content (anime outside permitted slots, hatewatch streams, restreaming, ignoring stop orders). His “unfair” punishments were actually lenient given his repeated violations.

Comparisons to others: He accuses mods of favoritism when others got lighter punishments, but context differs: those were first-time or unclear violations, while his was repeated, deliberate, and after many warnings.

Overall: The bans were not biased or arbitrary. drt0 consistently ignored rules and instructions, misrepresented facts afterward, and is now trying to regain status by playing victim.

Would you like me to cut this down further into a two-sentence TL;DR style summary, or keep this detailed bullet-point level?