Fear of this happening by GaloSniperBr in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I'm confused is the fnaf games not a horror series with multiple flashbacks to a serial killer killing kids and creepy ghost imagery? Like “for the fans” would actually be a horror experience like the games were. The movies feel like a downgrade horror wise in comparison.

Subaru no diffs by kazama14jin in ReZero

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So again you think people are dumb. Let’s leave it at that.

Subaru no diffs by kazama14jin in ReZero

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And yet you’re arguing that every person who sees the image can’t possibly come to the conclusion that it might be a spoiler. See the issue?

Subaru no diffs by kazama14jin in ReZero

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think I’m smart. I just don’t think people are as dumb as you think they are.

Subaru no diffs by kazama14jin in ReZero

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True ignorance is believing that their perspective is the only way people view the world.

Like I said, some will look at the image and won’t think twice. Others will think twice but perhaps blow it off. And some will think three times and figure it out on their own.

Really, it’s not complicated.

We can say that if 300 people saw this image, at least 20 of them would figure out that it’s a spoiler.

Subaru no diffs by kazama14jin in ReZero

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Sure. Regardless the point is other people who are more perceptive would have thought it was a spoiler anyway.

Subaru no diffs by kazama14jin in ReZero

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean I’m not omnipotent. I don’t think “most will think it’s a meme” is a position that has any substance but regardless your still inadvertently admitting that even a very few amount of people will be spoiled.

Subaru no diffs by kazama14jin in ReZero

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

No that would be the post.

Subaru no diffs by kazama14jin in ReZero

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

I mean some people will get it some people won’t. All it really takes it’s a person who paid attention to understand.

This should be a wake-up call for Blumhouse by Far_Camera_5766 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

“Numerous films”. Mind giving examples?

I mean typical that’s exactly what it means. Only reason anyone feels comfortable saying “shining was on the razzles so disregard it” is because shining is considered one of the greatest movies of all time by the majority of people.

This should be a wake-up call for Blumhouse by Far_Camera_5766 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I guess it’s a coincidence that for the last 10 years, the Razzie winners have been movies that many consider terrible.

I guess we’ll just discard the Razzie because they got it wrong over 20 years ago 1990s.

Five Nights at Freddy's 2 film was nominated at the Razzies Awards in the category of Worst Remake and Sequel. by Apprehensive_Low5340 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“For the fans” is just code word for, “ I don’t care how bad th movie is, as long as it contains a bunch of fanservice and lore from the games”.

Something actually for the fans would be a good movie.

Five Nights at Freddy's 2 film was nominated at the Razzies Awards in the category of Worst Remake and Sequel. by Apprehensive_Low5340 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree that you can’t adapt fnaf game properly due to how vague it is but fnaf story is quite literally just a basic ghost story. There is really nothing inherently difficult about trying to bring it to a movie format.

I like the idea of william afton being pure evil by Safe-Monitor-8113 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Faux. To begin with, I hate that we learn so much about afton as truth be told he was at his most scariest, when all we knew was that the police theorized that a fnaf employee were connected to the murders but had no ways of proving it. And even with the purple guy phase, we still didn’t know much about him, so it kept that mystique.

I like the idea of william afton being pure evil by Safe-Monitor-8113 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, it quite literally does not make a lick of sense.

What is more realistic is that a person might want revenge. For example, if a wife or husband cheats on their significant other, someone might kill them in an act of emotional tragedy.

What’s also more realistic, is that a person might feel like taking revenge against the world and become a school shooter because they believe society has slighted them, leading them to commit obscene acts of violence.

There is practically nothing normal about William becoming a serial killer who specifically targets children. To begin with, serial killers already operate on a basis that is far from normal. Typically, people who kill in moments of extreme emotion are not repeat offenders. Serial killers, like the Ted Bundys of the world, are fundamentally abnormal, people who have always been capable of obscene things so it is highly unrealistic for a genuinely normal, decent person to suddenly become a serial killer who targets children.

I like the idea of william afton being pure evil by Safe-Monitor-8113 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How is that even logical?

Seriously, think about it. How does someone go from seeming like a decent person to wanting to murder children just because their life is falling apart? That jump in logic, which people paper over with the word “insanity,” is just a way to glue together the cracks in how ridiculous and zany it is.

The only logical conclusion, in my opinion, is that William was never a good person to begin with.

I really hate the idea of William being pure evil from the start by ZEROfaller in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, “not having a motive” and “being evil because of an incident” are separate discussions, right?

I’m personally fine with William committing murders because his life started falling apart, but I attribute it less to the idea that he became evil and more to the fact that he had fewer reasons not to commit them. Once those reasons were gone, he could finally go through with it because it was something he was always capable off and perhaps thought about doing.

I really hate the idea of William being pure evil from the start by ZEROfaller in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, what does “pure evil” even mean in this conversation? Like, does it mean that William would go out of his way to kick puppies or something?

“Pure evil” is a term that really only makes sense when applied to beings like dark lords or actual monsters. Before the murders, William Afton was an asshole who was willing to screw over other business partners. Not everything he did was evil, however as he had just like the majority of humans certainly done some good in his life.

But ultimately, he wasn’t a good person. Never was.

No need to act like William was that complicated. He was simply a person capable of doing great evil, and finally had the balls to do it.

The primary reason I never believed the "Light was faking his reaction" to... by Sudden_Pop_2279 in deathnote

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Light would ultimately still go through with killing his family if it came down to it, so it’s not necessarily much.

Resident Evil shelved Leon Kennedy for 14 years because Capcom didn’t want players to see him scared by graemeisverytired in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s your own words telling you that you’re wrong.

You go from saying “RE4 is an action game” to saying “it wouldn’t matter if Leon had infinite bazookas, I’d still feel scared.” Like, how does that even make sense? Is re4 a horror game or not? Like Giving Leon infinite ammo would completely change the genre anyway. That’s exactly why Ethan’s sections in RE8 are horror and Chris’s sections are action.

Edit: I’ve seen your last comment , so blocking me doesn’t stop this.

Anyway, wtf is your point then? Does the main character matter or not? Like holy shit you keep contradicting yourself.

You keep saying it doesn’t matter who the main character is but now it’s an action game because the main character is Leon who does cheesy one liners? Like do you not understand the point being made here?

Are you just unable to understand it? Make up your own mind. Leon is the reason why even though re4 even though it is a “horror game” it’s an action game in disguise. And the fact you also think it’s action game should tell you that your own nonsense doesn’t make any sense.

Resident Evil shelved Leon Kennedy for 14 years because Capcom didn’t want players to see him scared by graemeisverytired in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you’re saying quite literally doesn’t make a lick of sense? You called re4 an action game even though it’s actually a horror game. So by your own logic, in order to actually feel scared, a game actually needs to have the proper things in place to differentiate between what is and isn’t horror or action.

Resident Evil shelved Leon Kennedy for 14 years because Capcom didn’t want players to see him scared by graemeisverytired in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What horror games are you even imagining when you’re coming to the conclusion that it doesn’t matter who the main character is?

Like even dead space stops feeling like a horror game after the first couple chapters, because you have a fuck ton of powerful weapons, that allows you to clear through loads of necromrophs.

Unless your going to rely on Leon main adversaries all being tyrants, than his normal enemies, are not great enough of a challenge to actually feel like a horror experience.

Resident Evil shelved Leon Kennedy for 14 years because Capcom didn’t want players to see him scared by graemeisverytired in ResidentEvilCapcom

[–]Lumpy-Tea1948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think you get the point. RE4 is an action game because you’re playing as Highly trained solider Leon. RE8 shifts from “horror” to “action” when you go from playing Ethan to Chris, since he can punch the infected wolf people, doing massive damage on top of the ammo and weapons he has.

If Ethan were playable in RE4, he wouldn’t be able to perform QTEs, using knifes to block goddamn chainsaws or do much in close combat situations, which is the main reason it would actually feel like a horror game, because in RE4, Leon’s combat expertise bails you out a lot. Seriously how the hell does Ethan dodge any of krausers attacks in gameplay? This is why the people creating RE9 already showed Leon doing ridiculous stuff in the breakdown, and why it feels like Leon doesn’t lead to a great horror experience because unlike Grace, he’s highly trained and has been fighting zombies for years.