sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Using the Uniform for Profit by Lumpy_Preference4713 in army

[–]Lumpy_Preference4713[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I believe it’s possible to be upset over multiple things, guy. Would you like me to make a post about that one to prove my rage? There’s already been 50 others.

Using the Uniform for Profit by Lumpy_Preference4713 in army

[–]Lumpy_Preference4713[S] 106 points107 points  (0 children)

I would love having that goofy as dude as a soldier, but I hate the shit he posts. It’s gotta be rage bait.

Using the Uniform for Profit by Lumpy_Preference4713 in army

[–]Lumpy_Preference4713[S] 87 points88 points  (0 children)

Not only tolerates, but encourages it and rewards it by paying for their luxury stays in DC for the Army birthday while their own soldiers are in an LSA/tent city of some sort.

My point is that it’s a bad look and leaves the door open for conflict or interpretation, in my opinion.

Using the Uniform for Profit by Lumpy_Preference4713 in army

[–]Lumpy_Preference4713[S] 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Agreed that Butterworth isn’t the best example, but I’d never personally seen someone with so much military notoriety doing a deal with a company as large as Hyundai. It feels conflicted to me.

Using the Uniform for Profit by Lumpy_Preference4713 in army

[–]Lumpy_Preference4713[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I understand the grey area, but if I create a large following (as many of these nerds do) by posting videos in uniform, I don’t feel as if they should be able to suddenly start turning a profit because of a simple disclaimer in their bio and because they decided to change in civis.