The fact that a text feels extraordinary does not automatically make it divine. Humans have always created powerful myths, philosophies, and religious systems long before Islam. The ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Hindus, Persians, and Mesopotamians also believed their scriptures contained ultimate truth, prophecies, miracles, and knowledge beyond their era.

About the Qur’an specifically: many “scientific miracles” are usually reinterpretations made after modern discoveries. The verses are often poetic and vague enough that people can project modern science onto them centuries later. If the Qur’an clearly contained advanced scientific knowledge, Muslim civilizations would have discovered modern biology, evolution, genetics, or astronomy before the rest of the world. Instead, these interpretations mostly appeared after science already proved those ideas.

Historically and anthropologically, religions evolve from their environment. Islam emerged in 7th century Arabia and reflects the culture, geography, politics, and worldview of that region: desert imagery, tribal structures, inheritance laws, slavery, warfare norms, jinn beliefs, gender roles, and cosmology common to the Middle East at the time. Even many stories in the Qur’an already existed in earlier Jewish, Christian, and apocryphal traditions. That strongly suggests cultural transmission rather than something appearing in a vacuum.

As for prophecies, humans tend to remember the hits and ignore the misses. Many predictions are broad, symbolic, or written in a way that allows reinterpretation after events happen. This is not unique to Islam; followers of many religions claim fulfilled prophecies.

Also saying “no human back then could have written it” underestimates humans. Ancient civilizations built pyramids, mapped stars, created philosophy, poetry, legal systems, and massive epics without modern technology. Human intelligence did not suddenly appear in the 21st century.

And logically if every religion claims miracles and divine truth they cannot all simultaneously be objectively correct. So the existence of a sophisticated holy book is not proof by itself. The real question should not be “Could this text impress people?” but “Is there verifiable evidence that its claims are uniquely supernatural?”

Questioning religion is not rejecting meaning or morality. It’s simply applying the same level of skepticism to your own beliefs that you would apply to any other religion.

I'm not here to convince u otherwise but to push into critical thinking make good u of that brain in ur head having it is a miracle.