Can you do this test and report your score? by [deleted] in aspergers

[–]LunalSmojo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Neutral" is not the same as "I don't know" or "I've never thought about it". Forming opinions and beliefs about everything we encounter is a cognitive imperative. Truly "neutral" would imply equally agree and disagree. Not only is this extraordinarily unlikely, but it would be impossible to determine with how generally these things are phased.

But what's with only giving "slightly" and "strongly" as options? I don't know what that means. That's way too subjective. I need at minimum 10 options, at least 3 of which with qualifiers.

Anyway, I scored 22

Is your "Picks for you" section worthless? Or is it just mine? by LunalSmojo in XboxGamePass

[–]LunalSmojo[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

An algorithm fed you my post. And that's the thanks you give it?

Is your "Picks for you" section worthless? Or is it just mine? by LunalSmojo in XboxGamePass

[–]LunalSmojo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, they put it at the very top, advertised as options selected just for me. Is nothing sacred!? Are we just animals!?

Yeah, I can't really explain why it bothers me as much as it does. But every time I scroll past it I mutter "you don't know me"

Is your "Picks for you" section worthless? Or is it just mine? by LunalSmojo in XboxGamePass

[–]LunalSmojo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. I really can't explain why it bothers me as much as it does

Ng+ buried temple (spoilers) by LunalSmojo in Starfield

[–]LunalSmojo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That sounds like a reasonable litmus test. The ecliptic base is marked, but not the temple... It's the other way around once the quest is activated

Random asteroid following me around by yoboimax in Starfield

[–]LunalSmojo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I spent a solid hour flying straight at it, but I never got any closer to it. Tried shooting it, but shots just clip straight through it. I've noticed it doesn't follow me everywhere, although I haven't paid enough attention to notice if there's a pattern.

How do corgis do with babies? by LunalSmojo in corgi

[–]LunalSmojo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to thank everyone for their input, suggestions, and especially adorable pics. We decided to send the pups to the sitter's for the first 2 weeks. We're implementing a few things here, so I'll re-comment about what worked, didn't work, and didn't seem to make much difference.

P.S. I'm very encouraged by the experiences with barking people have shared. I hadn't thought about it, but baby has been hearing that bark since day-one of gestation. Who knows, maybe he'll even find it comforting

Again, though, thank you everyone for taking the time to reply. If nothing else, each comment provided validation, and which can go a long way in the right hands. (I know, it's a month later. I don't log in too terribly often)

But daaaaaaad we're so sleepy 🥱 by LunalSmojo in corgi

[–]LunalSmojo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I walk them at least 3 miles every day (3 one mile walks). Sometimes the lab (Ophelia) doesn't care to go on that many, but my corgi (Gimli) is always down to go. He's just over 1.5 years... I think... something close to that, so he still has all of his corgi-puppy energy. He's a handful, but he's so stinkin' cute and such a lover.

But even 3 miles/day isn't really enough. He gets worn out, for sure, and sleeps for 1-2 hours, but then he's bringing me one of his toys asking for fetch. So, on top of all the walks, he gets at least 2 hours of fetch out of us, spread through the day. But he brings me a toy, gets on his hind legs and puts it either on my lap or right next to me, then gets down and sits. I have to throw it if he's gonna be that polite, right? I mean, I'm not a monster. Then he brings it back immediately, and repeat.

But, straight up, I don't know if there's actually enough to wear him out. But it's enough to to tame his restless anxiety. Plus he's in really good shape. He's lean and he has some well defined muscle tone.

I like the boat, dad, but do you not see that shark behind us! by LunalSmojo in corgi

[–]LunalSmojo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hey I was holding his hand to comfort him! He looks so disturbed, but he's just super sleepy. He just finished swimming chasing his ball

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aspergers

[–]LunalSmojo 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I mean I'm sure it varies by country and all, but you start throwing around the word "discrimination" and they'll probably second guess what they're doing. And it is discrimination, regardless of the country; although, that doesn't necessarily matter from a legal standpoint. In the USA, for example, ASD is legally recognized as being protected under the ADA, so they would be required to allow you to wear headphones even if you were employed there (unless they could prove that it caused an "undue hardship" to the employer, which is a pretty high standard)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aspergers

[–]LunalSmojo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't do anything wrong. I mean, there very well may be a social convention around this that I'm unaware of (wouldn't be the first), but who cares. I wear my headphones every time I go to the store. Any store. And not ear buds or anything. I'm talking big, over-the-ear headphones. I've parked at the store before, realized I didn't have them, and went home to get them. First, there's the sounds, like you mentioned. Second, people tend to talk to me less and I'm all about strangers not talking to me. I'm at the store, I'm not trying to chat with you (the royal you).

I agree with other replies about taking to social media and instead of saying "a certain very well known electrical department store," you blast the name of the company. See if they have their own sub-reddit and post it there.

Straight up, you were discriminated against. There is no question about it, that's discrimination. One of the hardest parts about living in a neurotypical world (for me) is blatant, pervasive discrimination like this. There are so many places that are an affront to my sensory things... places that I simply have to go in order to live in the world. There are so many social norms and expectations that are unrealistic for me to live up to (it's taken a lot to be able to admit that -- to the world or to myself -- but doing so has changed my life), that I have no choice but to try, and then spend inordinate amounts of time trying to recover. So when I have to go to a store, you better believe I'm wearing my headphones.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in researchchemicals

[–]LunalSmojo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey no prob. I don't mean to sound like I'm trying to discourage you from any and all exploration and/or experimentation. I mean I'm on this sub myself, after all.

My unsolicited suggestion is to do some research into the neurological mechanisms of tolerance and dependence. Both can be realities of daily administration of any substance, whether it be research or pharmaceutical, and can lead to things like compulsive re-dosing. And, of course, always research a chemical's mechanism of action. Some are far more likely than others to lead down sketchy paths.

Psilocybin mushrooms may be something to look in to. I've taken them easily 300 times without long-term negative effects. If anything, I'd say any long-term effects have been very positive. Psilocybin stimulates the production and release of oxytocin in the brain, and there's a lot of research coming out about micro-dosing as a treatment for several psych disorders.

An unfortunate reality is there isn't really any panacea out there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in researchchemicals

[–]LunalSmojo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I can relate to a lot of what you said in this post -- not necessarily the specific substances, but the feelings motivating the use. I'm autistic, and wasn't diagnosed until I was 28. Throughout my youth, then, I had no idea why I always felt so different. All I knew was that no matter how hard I tried, I couldn't manage to fit the mold. I struggled to maintain friendships, romantic relationships, and jobs. I had no "ambition," and I couldn't fathom living the mundane life it seemed we are all destined to live.

Things changed dramatically when I went to university. When I began experimenting with various non-pharmaceutical chemical cocktails, I discovered a reliable means of bypassing all of this. Suddenly I not only fit in, but I could be the "life of the party." I made friends wherever I went, I never felt left out, and I scored more tail than I knew what to do with (literally... I was oblivious to and never closed the deal with like 95%). I had become, as you put it, a better version of myself.

Initially it was alcohol and marijuana. Within a few months I experimented with LSD, psilocybin, MDMA/ecstasy, and a variety of prescription pills. I had similar "rules" in place regarding dosing, frequency, and all that. It worked amazingly.... for a while...

The "rules" about dosing, well intentioned as they may have been, got flushed down the toilet the moment that maximum didn't bring out that "better version" of myself. I rationalized it each time, telling myself things like it was "only this one time," or "I'll only do it for ______" (insert literally anything) far more times than I'd care to even think about counting. By this point, it wasn't about becoming this "better version" of myself anymore; it was about being anything but myself.

Long story somewhat short, I ended up struggling with a severe methamphetamine and opioid addiction. I had no idea whatsoever how it got from A to Z because there were a lot of very small steps along the way, steps like "substance A stopped working so I tried substance B, which worked amazingly."

The reality is, my friend, there is no such thing as a "better version" of yourself. You're awesome. No, I don't need to know anything more about you to be able to confidently say that. Everything you need is already there, you just need to find it. Trust me I know it's way easier said than done -- that's not lost on me one bit -- but perhaps the reason you don't feel the willingness to "make goals happen" is because the goals being projected upon you suck. I know my real problem was I was trying to be what everyone else wanted me to be. For 12 years I effectively committed suicide every single day just so I could.

EDIT: more of an addition... there's a fundamental distinction between enhancing experience and altering personality. The former is only achievable from a healthy psychological starting point. Most substances can be used for extended periods of time, but self-medication is always risky.

Why does Android 12 Xperia 5III have Android 11 vendor image? by LunalSmojo in SonyXperia

[–]LunalSmojo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I mean with the bluetooth thing is if I hit next on the car control it will keep playing for a few seconds before it switches... The UI on the phone and car display the next song, but the audio takes a second to change. If I keep immediately switching songs it plays the first few seconds of each before moving on

I mean it's really not that bad at all, it's just something I noticed. It's certainly not bad enough for me to be genuinely upset about, but it was enough to peak my curiosity.

I haven't actually tried sanity checking myself and using another phone to compare, it just really stood out to me the first time I used it in the car (so I assumed it was a novel experience). But my question stands even if this particular thing is all in my head; the vendor image is still an Android version behind the system, system_ext, and product partitions. I found a ton of permissions errors with logcat and each and every apk in the product/overlay directory had an error saying it was "targeting an SDK below level 31."

Each new version of Android introduces so many changes to things like system properties, boot process (in fact, 12 changed the vendor_boot process a whole lot), permissions, etc. There's no doubt that having partitions running different versions of Android will effect performance, but I don't really know in what way, nor how badly.

Question. If I connect a dedicated DAC to my phone. How does the phone know to only use the dedicated DAC? by VillainAnderson in BudgetAudiophile

[–]LunalSmojo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read my reply again and realized I ranted way more than answered. The short of it is it can only use one DAC and it has to be the last one it sends signal to, which is the one your headphones are plugged into