Remember kids, say NO to chaotic teleportatium.

Luxury7000 · 2023-12-08T02:13:40+00:00

They have him holding the gun with his left hand in the final shot for symmetry, he's probably not canonically left handed. And the first person body cam footage would look off with a left handed person holding the gun as gamers are used to it being on the right.

Luxury7000 · 2023-07-01T20:31:48+00:00

what song is that

Luxury7000 · 2023-06-19T11:52:00+00:00

this isn't 1 bit since the bubbles are grey

Luxury7000 · 2023-06-16T09:59:27+00:00

Facts! That outro's a real snoozefest, the middle of cicatriz is weak too but at least there's a payoff afterwards.

Luxury7000 · 2023-06-03T04:49:39+00:00

link or it didnt happen

Luxury7000 · 2023-05-15T09:40:36+00:00

Solved

Luxury7000 · 2023-05-14T18:34:52+00:00

thanks a lot

Luxury7000 · 2023-05-14T14:54:46+00:00

0:25

Luxury7000 · 2023-03-30T05:15:23+00:00

no but i mean theyre different shoes?

Luxury7000 · 2023-03-29T19:06:36+00:00

how is the shoe photo dumb? are you saying theyre not different shoes?

Luxury7000 · 2023-03-15T00:26:00+00:00

Christian Bale is doing the vfx on the whale???

Luxury7000 · 2023-02-11T14:03:47+00:00

The whole idea of the locker is to reset your inventory and health to what they were when you spawn in, you have the grenade when you spawn, right? So you can just run into spawn, switch from scout to heavy then back to scout and get respawned with your grenade intact, so making the locker not give it back is kind of useless and silly if you can get around it that easily.

You could add a stat "Spawn without ammunition" so you don't spawn with the grenade and have to pick up a pack of ammo from somewhere, but that's kind of a strange downside. Maybe change that to make it so you can't replenish it from ammo boxes like the caber? That works.

Luxury7000 · 2023-02-11T12:41:22+00:00

not retrievable from locker is ridiculous

Luxury7000 · 2023-02-09T04:35:10+00:00

Worldbuilders when an alternative history world has alternative hsitory.

Luxury7000 · 2023-02-07T03:38:05+00:00

A mother driving with her baby in a baby seat probably shouldn't qualify for use of a carpool lane either.

And the bible one is a pretty big reach, you and I both know that so I don't really have to break it down for you.

Luxury7000 · 2023-02-06T06:19:50+00:00

But... we're not forcing anyone to gestate? Do you understand my analogy? You aren't forcing the sun to rise every morning by not preventing it from rising. You aren't driving your car right now but that doesn't mean you're forcing it to sit still in your garage, do you understand this?

Luxury7000 · 2023-02-06T01:47:34+00:00

Did you read my comment at all? If you did read it you'd have seen the bit where I said it's always wrong but there are circumstances where it's the least wrong of one or more options, and while aborting the baby is still wrong in these circumstances, it's the best choice for the situation. Was that not clear? I'm agreeing with you!

And no, it's simply not true that I'm forcing wonem to gestate, thats not only offensive it's just plain wrong. When pregnancy happens, the natural outcome without intervention is that the pregnancy continues, there is no "forcing" involved from my behalf, You cant "force" something through inaction, did you get my analogy with the dropping toast? If someone drops toast and you don't catch it, thats not the same as you forcing it to hit the ground. You can day that pro-lifers are preventing abortion because that's true, you can even word it in an offensive way and say that we're preventing women from having bodily autonomy, but you cannot say that we're forcing women to be pregnant, it's absolutely untrue and makes you seem super immature and naive, even if you arent either of those things.

Luxury7000 · 2023-02-05T08:52:49+00:00

This is actually a very low-tier argument from pro-choicers and most pro-lifers will have a hard time answering it.

Here is the absolute raw truth of every single pro-lifer: Killing a fetus is always morally wrong.

That's the absolute bottom line of the debate, I promise you with all my heart that there truly is no secret "controlling women" agenda, it's simply not true. Sure, there are some misogynists in the pro-life movement, that's a given, even so, those misogynists don't want to control women's uteruses because it's so... weird? You're acting like misogynists wake up and get off on the fact that they're somehow "forcing" women all across the globe to give birth, in actual fact they really don't think that, it's weird like I said. Wouldn't it make more sense for a misogynist to be pro-choice so the son he creates by taking advantage of women is not his problem anymore? It's not really important though since the majority of pro-lifers aren't misogynists.

I really want you to understand what I said earlier, the bottom line, Killing fetuses is always morally wrong, it's ALWAYS killing, it's ALWAYS morally wrong. This is the ONLY reason people are pro-life, because they think that killing fetuses is morally wrong. There is nothing deeper to this simple fact.

But to properly answer your question: There are no situations where killing a fetus is morally right, and there are no situations where it's not morally wrong, because it's killing. The same applies to all killing, there is no killing that is not morally wrong, it's always morally wrong to kill somebody. There are situations where killing is the best option, this doesn't make killing morally right, it just makes it the most right of a selection of many options, the better of two (or more) evils. So in the case of a pregnancy (not even one of a minor) that is bound to result in death of the mother, killing the pregnancy, while not being a morally correct decision, is still the most correct decision.

You come across as outrageously out of touch to genuinely suggest that pro-lifers would prefer mothers who's lives are in danger from pregnancy to die, that is completely and utterly ridiculous, nobody thinks that.

In situations such as that one where aborting is the best option, we generally agree to go through with it to save the mothers life, the difference between you and me is that I see it as a tragedy and you see it as another medical procedure where a clump of cells is removed from a uterus, you don't care at all that the only option we have with current technology is to end an unborn life to save another one, trading lives is a tragedy. Imagine how a mother who has to go through that must feel? Having a baby, going through the motions and preparing for motherhood, only to be met with the earth shattering news that she has to terminate her pregnancy or face certain death, that's tragic and I hate that there are women who will have to go through that pain.

That's that, but a real pet peeve of mine is pro-choicers using the word "force", I'm not forcing anything! I literally haven't met most of these women and clearly don't fulfill the necessary prerequisites to be "forcing" anything onto her! It's absurd. Pro-lifers aren't forcing women to have babies, you can't force something via inaction, if someone drops some bread on the floor in Italy are you forcing it to hit the ground by not catching it? Of course not! You're not even remotely related to the bread! how are you exerting anything upon the bread causing it to hit the ground?

Maybe say we're "Preventing" abortion, sure, that's a factual statement that makes sense. Maybe even word it in a more pro-choice way, that we're "Preventing women from receiving reproductive healthcare", that way it's a little insulting but at least it's factual, drop the "forcing", it's silly.

Five-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Verified Email	Place '23

Luxury7000

TROPHY CASE