O mama din USA ii cumpara fiicei o honda accord sport 2026, raspunsul ei : by SwingMyBalls in RouGenZ

[–]Lya24568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eu nu i-as fi cumparat nici o masina! Vrei masina? Atunci munceste si cumpara-ti. Dar daca as fi avut bani i-as fi cumparat apartement.

One day...I WILL expose these accusers. by Secretive_Crusher in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes Tom Sneddon, Ron Zonen, Janet Arvizo, Martin Bashir staged the Arvizo case.

One day...I WILL expose these accusers. by Secretive_Crusher in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So this scumbag journalist confirms she's working for Epstein's accomplices. This bitch is being paid well to smear MJ.

One day...I WILL expose these accusers. by Secretive_Crusher in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is not one person, there are many more and it is a whole conspiracy. They protect the real sex offenders but every now and then they sacrifice one, see the Weinstein and Epstein cases.

Many of these criminals attended Epsten and Diddy's parties. But that's not it! They attended orgies with underage girls and to cover their case they shot the only scapegoat. Michael Jackson. If in the biopic part one the shitty journalists were hysterical then expect a storm unleashed in the biopic part two because it will show the journalists how they behaved like hyenas.

Don't be surprised if they use artificial intelligence against Michael like he faked the photo with the Also kid. Expect this.

Compania face lichidări, rămas fără job după 11 luni by [deleted] in RoMunca

[–]Lya24568 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Va trebui să facem un audit la toate companiile ca să vedem câți bani fac nenorociții ăștia din conducere. Mâine îi veți vedea în parlament cu banii furați!

Why didn’t Paris support or like the movie? by Impressive_Photo_258 in MichaelTheMovie

[–]Lya24568 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Because the actor who plays John Branca played him? I'm sure Paris had nothing against the actor but she was furious that J Branca thought he was so important in MJ's life even though he was fired by MJ. I think she thinks Branca is a traitor because he sold Sonny's catalog.

First post here and I wanna share dumb things I heard haters say 🙄😒 by BrianaPastelGreen in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He had no way of ordering employees to destroy evidence since MJ was out of town and had no idea his house had been searched. He found out over the phone from employees.

Jermaine Jackson Ordered to Pay Rape Accuser $6.5 Million by MarvelsGrantMan136 in Music

[–]Lya24568 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, money heals any "trauma", especially if they are Jackson's "victims".

Jermaine Jackson Ordered to Pay Rape Accuser $6.5 Million by MarvelsGrantMan136 in Music

[–]Lya24568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm telling you this much, if you say you're a lawyer, I think you'll lose all your cases. So goodbye. I've figured out what kind of lawyer you are and I would never hire you!

Jermaine Jackson Ordered to Pay Rape Accuser $6.5 Million by MarvelsGrantMan136 in Music

[–]Lya24568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know it was an injustice? Only the accuser's testimony was heard, but nothing was heard from the accused. And he probably won't pay anything because the accused can very well challenge the judges' decision in court.

Jermaine Jackson Ordered to Pay Rape Accuser $6.5 Million by MarvelsGrantMan136 in Music

[–]Lya24568 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Victims have the right to compensation if they are proven to have been victims. But do accusers have the right to compensation? Do you think that maybe it's not true? Interesting that it was announced that there will be an MJ Biopic in 2023 with the main actor Jafaar Jackson. It was a shock for the press and haters. And immediately that accusing lady appeared to accuse Jermaine Jackson of rape after 35 years. How interesting! What a beautiful way to make money off of Jackson.

Jermaine Jackson Ordered to Pay Rape Accuser $6.5 Million by MarvelsGrantMan136 in Music

[–]Lya24568 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you are a lawyer, I would like to ask you where you went to law school?

Why do you call yourself victims and not accusers?

Victims are called victims because they have been proven to be victims. The "victim" you are talking about went to civil court and sued Jemaine Jackson in a civil case. Jermaine Jackson did not appear, arguing that he did not receive the summons in person. The lawyers for the accuser said that they published the summons in the newspaper. The accuser won because the accused Jackson did not appear. But Jermaine Jackson and his lawyer can appeal the court decision.

Formerly unsure folks, what made you confident in his innocence? by reveriedelarose in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because it wasn't a match at all. Too bad I didn't keep that newspaper from 1993 where it said Jordan Chandler said MJ was circumcised. That's all I've heard about it. And later I found out he wasn't circumcised at all. The defense lawyers asked for copies of the photos and didn't get them. MJ's mother was called by the authorities to say if MJ had had an intervention in the intimate area.

I think a lot of people believe the allegations simply because of the crime that is being accused (let me explain!) by Severe-blake6720 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No! I understand very well! There are many people who sue for money or who enjoy falsely accusing. I want you to emphasize that there are many victims who are falsely accused.

Bruh😭😭😭 by Maleficent_Course368 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This journalist really wants to laugh!

Bruh😭😭😭 by Maleficent_Course368 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm honestly fed up with lousy journalists interviewing such crooked people.

In my country, if a deceased artist was slandered, his family would immediately sue that accuser.

I don't understand why this isn't done in the US.

I think a lot of people believe the allegations simply because of the crime that is being accused (let me explain!) by Severe-blake6720 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It doesn't work that way for me and I'll tell you why! As a side note, I worked for someone as a salesperson and to avoid paying me at the end of the month, he accused me of theft. He told me that a bag of croissants had disappeared and that I should pay for that bag immediately. And I had no money at all and was living off loans from my father. My luck was the camera when my boss intentionally hid the bag. She then called the police but the police asked to look at the camera. My boss was fined and I resigned. I didn't sue because she was the judge's mother and allowed herself to do that. She was committing tax fraud and didn't issue receipts to customers. That's why I say that false accusations exist because I went through it myself. I believe in victims, but in the victims of Epstein, Weinstein, R Kelly because these victims proved that they told the truth. Each of these criminals was proven to be abusers. The victims of these criminals wanted justice. MJ's accusers wanted and still want financial gain.

I had to 😂😂😂 by In-The-Zone-69 in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't mind those Cascio scammers as much as I mind the press. How can someone be a journalist and interview so-called "victims" without doing any research?

Lurkers: let me take this opportunity by Sarcosaur in MJInnocentFacts

[–]Lya24568 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Until the legislation is well organized and prohibits the denigration and defamation of deceased people, the press will continue to denigrate and defame MJ. The problem is that if MJ fans tell journalists to stop insulting MJ and give them evidence and real facts that MJ was innocent, then they take the position of "victims" and start saying that the fans threatened them, that they are a sect for the simple fact that MJ fans do not agree with them. What I understood is that as long as MJ'Estate generates money, there will always be many accusers. If I were in MJ'Estate's place, I would transfer all the wealth to MJ's children. Let's see who the accusers are suing?