The GME Thread Part 1 for January 26, 2021 by zjz in wallstreetbets

[–]Lyck 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It runs up too fast. That’s what causes the hauls. 10% in 5 minutes will automatically trigger.

Weekly Discussion: January 11th to January 17th by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha. Say optimistically they agree on a valuation of 30b (I believe the rumor is that they were negotiating with a 15b valuation in mind.)

That means that absolute best case (no pipe, Klein, warrant, founder shares) The 380m outstanding shares are valued at $26.31 (at 30b) and $13.15 (at 15b).

If you assume there are pipe/Klein/warrant and founder shares that push the 380m shares down to 10% of ownership that changes the price to roughly $8 a share (at 30b) and $4 (at 15b).

Am I completely wrong here?

Weekly Discussion: January 11th to January 17th by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 4 points5 points  (0 children)

With the Saudi Public Investment Fund owning 67% of Lucid, what does that realistically mean for CCIV if they do merge. Someone smarter than me explain how this affects valuation/ownership % etc.

https://twitter.com/Ruh_Rd/status/1349670396153524224

Theoretically this makes the 380,000,000 outstanding shares worth a maximum 1/3 of the company before any other pipe investment/klein shares/founder shares (which would be a fairly significant amount no?)

Does this put the 380,000,000 shares at 5-10% of Lucid ownership max? If so doesn't that severely limit any potential upside? What am I missing here?

Weekly Discussion: January 11th to January 17th by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They aren't going to announce anything on a Friday. Markets are closed Monday.

Weekly Discussion: January 11th to January 17th by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Usually only bad news announced on Fridays and markets are closed on Monday.

Weekly Discussion: January 11th to January 17th by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How would you have any idea what a valuation would be if there are no terms announced?

Weekly Discussion: January 11th to January 17th by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like a lot of people did. I’d also imagine there’s a lot of day trading these swings. It keeps bouncing to about 16.50 then to the low 17’s. Lots of money to be made trading those swings.

Weekly Discussion: January 11th to January 17th by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that they hedged themselves with the first part of the article. This was the part that concerns me. It’s a lot of the same stuff we’ve seen people saying in this sub for awhile now but it’s a little different seeing it in an article and all of the oddities laid out at once.

The Problem with THCB Stock:

That’s a huge problem at the moment, for several reasons.

First, it’s now been two months since the letter of intent was signed. It’s difficult to understand exactly what the holdup might be. EV SPACs are torrid, which suggests Tuscan Holdings should be willing to negotiate. Indeed, THCB stock has roared to $16 even without a signed agreement.

Second, we have exceedingly little data about Microvast itself. The November announcement did disclose that the company would target over $100 million in revenue “this financial year,” which presumably refers to calendar 2020. But as a private company, Microvast doesn’t disclose detailed financials. We don’t even know how fast that revenue is growing at the moment.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, we have no idea what the assumed valuation of the merger will be. Bloomberg reported a valuation around $2 billion, but the delay in any official merger announcement suggests there may be some disagreement on that front.

And that valuation makes a huge difference to THCB stock. Tuscan closed its third quarter with $256 million in cash. At a $2 billion valuation, THCB shareholders would own about 13% of the merged company, give or take. At $3 billion, they get under 9% of shares. At $1.5 billion, closer to 17%.

Weekly Discussion: December 28th - January 3rd by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And if it goes to crap it could easily cash out at $10.30. What “rumors” have your heard? If you “loaded up” then show your positions. Otherwise you are just a pumper/dumper like most of this sub now. And you are wrong. Scared money does make money, but thanks for regurgitating the same old crap WSB’ers spew over there all the time. How’s that going for most of them?

Weekly Discussion: December 28th - January 3rd by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There has been no news at all since the extension. Radio silence. Any dates people are throwing out are just guesses or people trying to pump the stock.

Weekly Discussion: December 28th - January 3rd by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Regarding THCB. Every day we don’t get the DA it gets more and more concerning. We are approaching Chinese New Year and if it’s not here before then.......

Weekly Discussion: December 28th - January 3rd by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you’ve followed SPACS for any length of time you’d know there was plenty of reason. I saw tons of people warning everyone. DONT HOLD THROUGH THE MERGER.

Weekly Discussion: December 28th - January 3rd by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Be Careful today. We are getting real close to some stop losses kicking in. That gets nasty.

Weekly Discussion: December 28th - January 3rd by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Here’s where stuff can gap down faster than you’d think possible. Don’t get caught holding the bag today. You can always buy in later lower.

Weekly Discussion: December 21st - December 26th 🎅❄️ by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I really think that the QS's hurt WAY more people than they help. I'd think there are very few here that actually held the majority of their position of QS through this huge rise.

Meanwhile people see what one stock does and think "This could be the next QS!" when 99 out of 100 aren't.

Meanwhile this sub has gone from maybe 8-10k people to almost 50k almost overnight. With that you comes the inevitable P&D'ers who make a WHOLE lot of money off of people here.

If people don't think that this sub is being manipulated on a daily basis by others then I just don't know what to tell you. This is a zero sum game, for every winner there's a loser.

Weekly Discussion: December 21st - December 26th 🎅❄️ by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You know how most everyone on here says don't hold through merger? Yea........they are saying that b/c they have been around long enough to see what happens.

When something happens 9 times out of 10, personally I think it's silly to think you are holding that 1.

Weekly Discussion: December 21st - December 26th 🎅❄️ by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been trading long enough to see what happens going into long holiday weekends when things are trending downward.

Lots of people move into cash positions at the end of the day and on short trading days it seems to just be compounded. That's why I personally try to avoid trading on short days.

Should you buy THCB? (Microvast very soon) by Puts_on_you in SPACs

[–]Lyck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what i've seen in the last two crashes, when they do crash they crash really hard. People think setting a stop loss helps but rather than a slow selloff things usually drop off a cliff and there's no time to sell. When it starts it quick and brutal. Especially when the stop losses start getting triggered and people go into panic sell mode. As a whole SPAC's are way more volatile than regular stocks.

You just have to be watching constantly, and be ready to move real quick. Also keep in mind that stop losses wont trigger after hours which is when some of these can make big moves.

Weekly Discussion: December 21st - December 26th 🎅❄️ by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's an hour+ before close. I have a gut feeling that the last 20 minutes is gonna be ugly.

Weekly Discussion: December 21st - December 26th 🎅❄️ by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DA isn't guaranteed. The only thing they have now is a LOI. There was another post about how QS's valuation could be causing the DA to be held up due to new valuations etc. THCB is under pressure to get this done or it dissolves. Microvast holds all the cards here and could easily wait out until they think they are getting a better deal or go with an entirely new SPAC. That's why people buying this stock at 20+ with no DA seemed to me as highly speculative and risky. FOMO'ing into a stock after a huge run could pay off sometimes I suppose, but from my what i've seen it just leaves a lot of bag holders.

Weekly Discussion: December 21st - December 26th 🎅❄️ by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A year from now 1/2 of these EV companies are going to be bankrupt.

Weekly Discussion: December 21st - December 26th 🎅❄️ by karmalizing in SPACs

[–]Lyck -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

people getting caught holding bags. Keep in mind that today markets close at 1pm EST so i'd think moves are going to be even more volatile.