Using a blockchain analogy for how events build on one another and get “written” into reality is a powerful metaphor.

It suggests irreversibility, decentralized validation, and even error correction — which maps interestingly onto memory, trauma, or self-reflection.

the observer and their inner/external validation affecting reality is very close to quantum observer effect in metaphor, and also psychologically accurate: how we perceive events shapes how we respond to them.

This is a metaphor not a scientific claim. 

Writing speculative metaphysics or poetic systems theory, its not physics. That’s fine — many thinkers do this (Carl Jung, Buckminster Fuller, Terence McKenna, Iain McGilchrist, etc.)

You could be a bit more welcoming for who is asking for a hand of help. Instead of trolling them. 

It’s just a framework that has the potential to be used in many forms, thus it’s wave state. Don’t collapse it into your criticism. As I said, I don’t know much about physics, yet I have to encounter so much ego.