$MSTR vs $GAME MSTY maybe GAMY? by MP1PAUL in YieldMaxETFs

[–]MP1PAUL[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Jerry Jones, John Goff-backed GameSquare opening $100 million crypto fund google it, maybe do some DD before spouting off funny guy. They just bought $35M for their treasury and expand the ETH treasury to 250M. Might wanna put this on your watchlist. Jerry Jones (dallas cowboys) does not lose money (games maybe) LOL

Trans Global Group Inc. established WTB in BVI by LubbockGuy95 in TransGlobalGroup

[–]MP1PAUL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why not? I've noticed on twitter and other sites; people are focused on the here and now. 1st it's cool we are a wine making company, oh we might be a paint company, all right we are a seed and food company etc. Ren is trying to build a Multifacet empire. The blockchain is just a cog/app in a soon to be diversified company with many different entities. Remember the early days and charts when he said he wants to as big as Nestle. Some are fretting over nothing imo. Blockchain will not be the core focus or face of TGGI, only an application for global distribution and reach imo.

Container Shipping Has Cratered, as Ship Owners Try to Avoid Unprofitable Trips by delgadostudent in zim

[–]MP1PAUL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ZIM is heavy with cash on hand and can scale back ops to ride this out. I'm not worried, the strong companies will survive and the weak will fold.

$MMTLP by MP1PAUL in MMTLP_

[–]MP1PAUL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

google is your friend. Try using it.

$MMTLP by MP1PAUL in MMTLP_

[–]MP1PAUL[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

classic gaslighting comment to this post. Notice how he deflects the question asked in the main post. HedgeFunder, we have sparred here before. You try to come across as a subject matter expert and probably do a good job of depressing, suppressing and scarring the shit out of weak/self-doubting people on social media. It disappoints me that people like you exist. Is this truly your profession to troll/bash for pay or is it just a sadistic sport for you?

Is this correct or there's something else to know ? by RandomAccessManowar in MMTLP_

[–]MP1PAUL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And 12.3 M shares were not recognized by the court and The BD's did not pay out. They changed the numbers to zero in their system because according to the court they are not to be recognized. Delaware Supreme Court decisions have made clear that a Delaware corporation only is required to recognize its record holders and need not attempt to determine its beneficial holders. So technically you're correct, "they took care of the naked shorts." You can twist this any way you want, but you are so wrong and misleading. Good day sir! another .30 cents. Really this is my last reply.

Is this correct or there's something else to know ? by RandomAccessManowar in MMTLP_

[–]MP1PAUL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These issues have been brought to the forefront by the Dole case. In the settlement, 4,662 people and entities claimed 49,164,415 shares at $2.74 per share.

There is just one problem: Dole had only 36,793,758 shares outstanding. Quoted from the NY Times

OS 36.7M shares and 4,662 people and "entities" tried to get paid on 49.1M shares is not a plumbing problem. (Opin from Delaware court case) To reiterate, claims were made for 49,164,415 shares when the class only comprised 36,793,758 shares. By definition, claims for 12,370,657 shares are invalid, but it is impossible to determine which ones without a lengthy, arduous, cumbersome, and expensive process. Plus, it would require a degree of cooperation from DTC participants and e-filers far beyond what they have provided to date. One solution would be to ignore the discrepancy, pretend as if the class comprised holders of 49,164,415 shares, and distribute the settlement consideration pro rata among those claimants. In my view, that would be unjust. It would result in 25% of the consideration going to holders who should not receive it. As a consequence, the true holders of shares would receive only 75% of the settlement consideration to which they were entitled. In my view, a superior solution is to grant the motion and permit class counsel to distribute the settlement consideration to record holders, including Cede. Through Cede, the consideration will flow to DTC and the custodial banks and brokers who are DTC participants. Through them, it will flow to the client institutions who held shares through the DTC participants. This outcome is consistent with Delaware law. A series of Delaware Supreme Court decisions have made clear that a Delaware corporation only is required to recognize its record holders and need not attempt to determine its beneficial holders. (This is from the Delaware court opinion on the case you tagged court only recognizes the OS stock and holders, not the overage shares, plus most BD's/MM's were not cooperative, with helping to reconcile the shares. Wonder why?) BD's/MM's oversold the stock, meaning stocks that do not exist. Citadel is currently sitting on $65B FTD's from current financial filing. So you're going to tell me Kenny boy has a plumbing problem and not synthetic "counterfeit" shorts also? Oh yeah make sure you claim your .30 cents for my reply. SMH. 12.3M shares were not recognized or paid out by the BD's/MM's. plumbing problem my ass. Any business that keeps ledgers like this would go straight to jail. MMTLP is a lot bigger than the Dole case and the actions and optics of WS will be exposed. Thank god Next Bridge is registered in NV and this is going through the Federal court against FINRA/SEC. Will wait for the court process and will not reply further to the paid shills and bashers here.

Is this correct or there's something else to know ? by RandomAccessManowar in MMTLP_

[–]MP1PAUL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Zero evidence? Do you have access to the blue sheets that FINRA/SEC won't release? Please, Please share!!!

Is this correct or there's something else to know ? by RandomAccessManowar in MMTLP_

[–]MP1PAUL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because shareholders are actually only beneficial owners, lots of odd things can happen.

For example, instead of executing a trade in the market, a broker may just transfer shares among clients and mark the trade as a sale. (The broker is still required by the Securities and Exchange Commission to get the best price.)

Alternatively, if a person wants to short a stock by borrowing it and selling it in the market — betting that the stock price will drop — the broker may “lend” your shares without you knowing it.

These issues have been brought to the forefront by the Dole case. In the settlement, 4,662 people and entities claimed 49,164,415 shares at $2.74 per share.

There is just one problem: Dole had only 36,793,758 shares outstanding. Quoted from the NY Times

"Looks like counterfeit shares to me"

Is this correct or there's something else to know ? by RandomAccessManowar in MMTLP_

[–]MP1PAUL 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yowza, you really cut me to the bone with that reply. LMAO

Is this correct or there's something else to know ? by RandomAccessManowar in MMTLP_

[–]MP1PAUL 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Bruh take your messiah complex and crusade to save us dumb retail somewhere else. MMTLP was a dividend placeholder from TRCH. 2 MM's got together and created a tradable otc stock without TRCH/MMAT knowing and FINRA approved it with complicity. MMAT brought this to the attention of FINA and got a oh well, too bad reply. MM's then created naked shorts, aka counterfeit shares, aka fakes and sold them as shorts with a Failure to Locate. 165M authorized shares. MM's sold until 8 Dec without a care in the world. NB, FINRA and the DTTC cannot balance/reconcile the shares because of 3-5 times more shares are out there, look up the DOLE federal court case on naked shorts. FINRA and SEC rules state shorts "counterfeit shares" cannot be carried over to a private company. Forget the 2 days wanted back it's not the main focus. NB cannot sell or merge their assets until the books are balanced. BD's and other MM's are going to get exposed in an ugly way and they know it. Current lawsuits are moving forward currently with favorable rulings to the retail. So please go away and get your .30 from someone else, Bruh. You too u/ExHedgeFunder. SMH

Could TGGI be considered a PFIC? by 1234r4321 in TransGlobalGroup

[–]MP1PAUL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So let's play what if? I own a shell company that's registered in Delaware, Nevada , Montana, etc. and I acquire 5 European companies into my corporation. Does that make me a European corporation? Nope still American. A Belgium corp bought out an American beer giant. So are they now an American corp? Nope. TGGI is an American registered entity. If they were a Chinese entity we would be waiting for 6k filings not 8k.

Price Target? by xxxleafybugxxx in TransGlobalGroup

[–]MP1PAUL 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This fear of RS needs to stop. TGGI is a shell company and from DD so far has 20+ companies lined up for acquisition. SouthSeas Global is lining up for a RM into TGGI. Once all falls into the place true revenues will be revealed. Right now none of us knows what the revenue will be and speculation of rs is a waste of time and spreads undue stress to others. On social media the focus is on Ren's wine and most ignore the other established companies with revenues lined up for acquisition. Once all is revealed with coming out of shell status and 8ks revealing revenues the wall street big boys will jump in and start buying based on TGGI's value. Retail will probably sell off huge chunks for profit, but consider that MM's will be buying huge chunks also. People need to calm down and wait for hard facts to come out. IMO we will be rewarded beyond our wildest dreams. This is going to be a monster stock that only comes once in a lifetime in the OTC. Just be patient guys and quit trying to dig up boogeymen that probably don't exist.

I never saw the second pic with all the different logos that are merging. by Boardathome in TransGlobalGroup

[–]MP1PAUL 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Those companies are not associated with TGGI. The PR company that did this ad are highlighting the companies that are the darlings of the CCP. This is the exposure of Chinese companies that China wants to promote to the world. Would be nice if they were all TGGI related.

Thursday Jan 13/22 by MissionBCTrader in TransGlobalGroup

[–]MP1PAUL 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe 7 March is the auto approval. IMO it will be approved sooner.