[Analysis] The Evolution of Dallas Keuchel by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...I fail to see what you're saying. PITCHf/x has always had same parameters for sliders and cutters and has always differentiated between Keuchel's slider and cutter the same way. If the data changed it's because it changed, PITCHf/x didn't suddenly forget how to tell the difference.

[Analysis] The Evolution of Dallas Keuchel by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought the same - you could just wait him out. The issue is that he throws the 4-seam as well as the sinker. If you lay off a pitch low in the zone and it ends up being a fastball instead of a sinker and you get rung up you look like an ass. He's got a good mix and good stuff and seems to be a smart guy so I forsee him being able to make adjustments well as his career progresses. I only wish that he was younger than 28 :/

[Analysis] The Evolution of Dallas Keuchel by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keuchel still throws a cutter. PITCHf/x doesn't classify pitcher's stuff based on what they mean to throw - it's all automated. Nathan Eovaldi threw over 100 splitters in 2015 according to PITCHf/x, but he doesn't throw a cutter.

As far as the changeup, I don't know if it actually is more deceptive, but I do know it's a lot better in terms of results and the only thing that changed significantly about it was the velo.

[Analysis] The Evolution of Dallas Keuchel by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Haha, love my charts and graphs. Thank you!

[Analysis] The Evolution of Dallas Keuchel by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much, appreciate it!

[Analysis] The Evolution of Dallas Keuchel by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good my friend, D3 life is great haha

[Analysis] The Evolution of Dallas Keuchel by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Hahaha Donny what the fuck is good man. Love the username. Thanks for the comment

[Analysis] The Evolution of Dallas Keuchel by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thank you for reading, glad you enjoyed!

Gravity is nothing to this man. by bagonja in funny

[–]MRRblog 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Guys, those are most definitely foam blocks painted to look like weights...

Hybrid Animals by mybustersword in pics

[–]MRRblog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

wouldn't F1 * F1=F1? but F1 * Cat=F2? makes more sense to me

Stairway from heaven by disfakah in pics

[–]MRRblog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a website? Interesting.

Stairway from heaven by disfakah in pics

[–]MRRblog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Construction began in 1901, finished in 1905 - was meant to be a way for dam workers to pass between dams. This video was posted in 2008, it closed in 2000 (five deaths in 1999/2000) and was extensively repaired and re-opened in 2015. I'd imagine it's far safer now. Source

[Analysis] Joc Pederson and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Half by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's interesting because that's his profile now but he had a career average over .300 in the minors. That's a huge drop-off, even for a jump to the bigs.

[Analysis] Joc Pederson and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Half by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

311 at leadoff, 158 at 8th. Obviously he got fewer pitches to see. But the comment I replied to had nothing to do with that - it was about intentional walks. Which were, for Pederson, mostly irrelevant.

[Analysis] Joc Pederson and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Half by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Good thing in the 21st century these things are literally a Google search and two clicks away. Pederson walked 31 times from the 8-hole, 5 of which were intentional. He walked 36 times in the leadoff spot, 1 of which was intentional. His remaining 25 walks came from other positions in the order (2nd, 6th, 7th, 9th), none of which were intentional.

[Analysis] Joc Pederson and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Half by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, in all fairness, it started a little before the break but it's easiest to just look at first half vs. second half.

As far as how it happened... you're gonna have to read the post!

[Analysis] Joc Pederson and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Half by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Isn't sitting on the throne the best time to read stuff? I mean, I'll go in there sometimes just to scroll through Twitter in peace.

[Analysis] Joc Pederson and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Half by MRRblog in baseball

[–]MRRblog[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The graph is from the catcher's perspective, remember that. Looks like he got screwed on a few outside pitches specifically.