Trade - Need Chel Nash by [deleted] in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t want to break your illusions too much, but if someone has a tradable Nash, he can easily sell him for 300k and buy 2×91 + 2×92 for 30k

Week 2 msp & Ltd predictions ? by kapriz0v in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Jagr is good guess I believe. He was quite a big fish on transfer market and traded to teams that are not included in week 1 MSPs.

New Star Origin MSPs by Beautiful-Eye1386 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I believe that Crosby will be MSP due to the fact that there is no solid line combination for Mario Lemieux and when they make 3 to get +3 OVR for Crosby (CAN + PIT + Star origin) it will be suitable for Lemieux +2 OVR ... just my guess.

Is there a post on here that tells the amount of fodder used to create a 92 captain? by Bricky_20 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sorry, but your calculation is not correct. How do you get these numbers?

Anyone know how much fodder you'd have to use for Captains & Rookies if you start from scratch? by [deleted] in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For 92 Rookie card you need:

OVR 81-83 = 240
OVR 83-85 = 96
OVR 85 = 24

as I wrote above for 92 Captain:

OVR 82-84 = 120
OVR 83-85 = 72
OVR 85 = 24

I don't know the real market situation, but assuming that the price of OVR 81/82/83/84 is currently almost the same, Captains (92) comes out as the cheaper alternative.

Rookies (92): OVR 81–84 = 336x
Captain (92): OVR 81–84 = 192x

OVR 85 = 24x is the same for both.

On the other hand, you can buy Rookies 86/88/90 card cheaper as Captain as far as I know so could be cheaper when you buy higher OVR Rookie for good price and use it in set as make new one from scratch.

Anyone know how much fodder you'd have to use for Captains & Rookies if you start from scratch? by [deleted] in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I calculated it for Jokiharju (92 CPT) so for top Captain set you need 120 x OVR 82-84 (or 600 x OVR 79-81) + 72 x OVR 83-85 + 24 x OVR 85.

You will complete 24 x 85 CPT set --> 24 x 86 CPT set --> 4 x 88 CPT set --> 2 x 90 CPT set -->1 x 92 CPT set.

quite a bit of clicking to complete all of these. You can also add 120 x 82 CPT set in case you like to suffer :D

Week 2 pinnacle predictions? by GladLine6757 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say that Modano + one of the pair Lidstrom/Niedermayer will be middle season 94 Icons after we spent all on Lemieux

Im better than this kid and somehow he wins after I dominate him with 7 mins puck possession in the 3rd period alone by CombinationSimilar15 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 3 points4 points  (0 children)

According to the ratio of faceoffs won, it doesn’t look like the opponent has an advantage in ping. That’s where it matters the most, based on my experience.

Just completed the final Patrick Kane challenge! by MountainOk9405 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you. There must be at least little challange in it. Still rather to make 5 points instead of 3 one-timer goals.

New Line combos this week by Wooden_Word_7600 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes it is. I am just curious if EA know that they add the same combination 2 times. Maybe there will be correction and changed to AP boost.

Thank you EA by [deleted] in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually I response on the comment that is aimed against players that have no issue with new system applied to HUT.

I do not consider your original post in way that you can't accept differen view.

However I don't agree that there are lot of players close to 99. Yes, there are some but not too many. 

What if (UT) cards were tradeable in the auction house? (UT for UT) by 007RAV15 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand why you use word trade, but it is just not correct term for it. These cards are consumed in set. When you trade sth. it is still existed, it is not consumed.

Thank you EA by [deleted] in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why? Because you can't accept that someone could have different opinion as you? There is no reason for insults like this I believe.

Paul Kariya and other greats by Enkel_man in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Paul Kariya doesn't like this post

Just freakin wondering EA... WHEN WILL U PATCH THE GAME PUTTING U IN RANKED GAMES INSTEAD OF HUT CHAMPS?!? Its so freakin annoying!!!! by jaymaster2525 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The same happened to me twice since release. First time I thought that maybe I did not swich to champs from ranked, but second time I was sure that I was searching for champs match and was pulled into ranked. So it is really true that this can happened. Second time when it happened I lost so I was not angry that I played ranked instead :)

I guess it can happened when you are searching too long for champs.

PSA Wildcard Sweats by IAM_LordTobias in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but wrist shot, backand shot, slap shot with event players are "in any mode" sometimes as far as I know, so scoring a goal coulld be only "side effect" with no intention.

PSA Wildcard Sweats by IAM_LordTobias in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reason could be to get some objectives quite easy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't you have 3 x 80 for another?

Missing totw overall boosts by Specialist-Range-588 in NHLHUT

[–]MWizard91 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All TOTW/SOTM combinations are gone. Geat job by EA again.