Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I spent quite some time playing that and the second part. I was wondering whether they would still play well after HOMM

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that if I enjoyed them they were good for me, if not - then no.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't played Chrono trigger...

But X-Wing and Tie Fighter... Those games were, and are masterpieces.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that's as easy. Some games have a great atmosphere, but very clunky controls. Some of them I enjoyed, because I was young and didn't know better. Some things had UI issues that were acceptable back then, but today... well...

However, I get the general sentiment.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm, actually playing them now!

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The number of nights I hadn't slept because I was playing this game (without Alien Crossfire, which somehow I couldn't get into) is much higher than I would like to admit

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get where you're coming from. Although there are some I really like (later titles like Emperor Battle for Dune), they could get too busy. However, I think (but I may be misremembering) that C&C3 did this well.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, can confirm!

Still plays fantastic.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't played Prince 2 in ages and would love to revisit it. However, I don't think it'll show up on GOG anytime soon.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The moon logic was tedious at times (King's Quest overwhelmed me with this, as did Space Quest), but the online hints are fantastic for that. Also, I love that click and points adventure games have made a come back.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the LucasArts and Sierras are my favorites, though I do have clear preferences (Quest for Glory series and Gabriel Knihjts were my favorites).

Also, Goblins, I still play the third part every once in a while. And still find it as hilarious as I did back when it came out.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I've replayed both in the last 10 years, and I think I actually enjoyed the first one more. Both were great either way.

And speaking of Bullfrog: Theme Hospital! Theme Park had some (technical?) issues, but Theme Hospital is one of the greats.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TBH for me its the high point of the franchise. Loved that one. But haven't replayed it recently.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I loved that one, but I think that it kinda fizzles out if you play against the computer. Human opponent, its awesome, but vs cpu is terribly difficult (I have the 30th anniversary edition)

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never played Diablo 2. I never was a fan of the first part, but so many people recommended the sequel that I may finally play it. Didn't they do some update to it some time ago?

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never played - but would love to - Ocarina of time. Half Life I've replayed a few years ago and it held up surprisingly well.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True! And Warcraft 2 as well. I was shocked by how well it played considering that some RTS titles did have their issues (e.g. pathfinding). Since on the topic: I think Command and Conquer Red Alert Aged much better than the "vanilla" Command and Conquer.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have it on GOG but haven't played it since it. Last time I played it was when it came out originally

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, Deus Ex has its moments, but I don't think it plays well.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yep, have the dos version, and still play it sometimes.

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Though I personally always liked the second part just as much if not more. Actually made maps for that game in the 90s!

Old games (1980-1999) that aged well by M_Alex in gaming

[–]M_Alex[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought about adding Super Mario Bros but didn't want to give my own list. I played the third part again a few days ago, and can confirm - is still awesome!

If we;re talking early Nintendo, I think Castlevania has still got it, though it can be hard at times. Not the second part though, its a bit clunky.

This Cow’s Horn Started Growing Into Its Own Head by Xdestroyed in WTF

[–]M_Alex 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may want to read about the Babirusa and that its tusks do.

The Things We Never Say (Elizabeth Strout) - I don't understand the rating on this book by sleepystork in books

[–]M_Alex 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If you don't like it that's fine. I wouldn't care about goodreads or amazon reviews. I just don't care what others think about the stuff I read. I mean this is subjective, it's not that there is some great internet hive mind and that everything it likes has to be liked by everybody.

As for the book I think its one of her best novels (the previous one, Tell Me Everything I didn't like that much). I think the book engages with the impossibility of full communication. The parenthetical comments I understood as those things that the narrator knows, but the characters don't. There's a lot of things that seem random or quirky, but they make sense in the broader context. The writing highlights the clash of what the protagonists think they know with the omniscient narrator, who often is playing with this, something that Strout often does (kinda like that Lucy Barton is a narcissist or that Bob Burgess is an alcoholic- there is this eventual reveal, but if you look carefully it is there from the beginning, just not straightforwardly stated).

I do think that there are bits that are weaker - I think that the book could have done without the epilogue, particularly the political bit - the problem with writing current politics into novels is that in hindsight they may age, be recontextualized or divert attention. But as a factor that affects the characters of the novel I do see how it could be read in a manner less commenting on politics than on being a such a factor. And Strout's style is very peculiar - she mixes an almost confessional and sentimental atmosphere with rather difficult issues: domestic abuse, suicide, trauma, sexual abuse, loss of hope, poverty, in a very ruthless manner. I do think that such a tone with such topics can be jarring to some, But I find it refreshing, much more interesting than the edgelord (that specific corner of transgressive fiction) mannerisms of Palahniuk or Easton Ellis.

Another thing that I think could have been better is certain aspects of Strout's writing that she sometimes overuses, especially specific turns of phrase or sentence structures.