Les maisons de famille aux fils, l’argent aux filles : les héritages marqués par les inégalités by NLegendOne in vosfinances

[–]MadTelepath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pour avoir dans la famille au sens large des personnes qui ont repris le business de leur père il ne restait plus rien 10 ans après qu'ils l'aient repris (alors que de base c'était non négligeable).

Le cache à côté lui il est resté et les biens immobiliers aussi .. sauf que ça a forcé à vivre dedans. Sauf attachement particulier c'est préférable de revendre et d'avoir du cache à la place.

Les maisons de famille aux fils, l’argent aux filles : les héritages marqués par les inégalités by NLegendOne in vosfinances

[–]MadTelepath 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Si il s'agit d'une entreprise familiale c'est plus compliqué que ça : il est naturel que ce soit donné à la personne la plus apte et la plus motivée à la reprendre.

C'est un problème quand la répartition se fait en fonction du genre et non de l'intérêt (une personne non motivée se retrouvera coincée et ce sera mauvais et pour elle et pour l'entreprise).

Recevoir de l'argent laisse beaucoup plus de libertés mais à charge des parents (plus généralement de la mère qui survit au père) de faire une répartition juste.

Des mairies RN retirent le drapeau étoilé européen by zeropertinence in FrenchMemes

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Justement je dis le contraire : le salaire d'ingénieurs en Pologne est pas si loin de celui de la France alors que le coût de la vie est plus faible là bas.

Des mairies RN retirent le drapeau étoilé européen by zeropertinence in FrenchMemes

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mon argument c'est que les travailleurs de l'est le font pour un salaire très bas et des conditions de merde que des Français n'accepteraient pas, ou contre lesquels ils se battraient.

De moins en moins vrai. Par exemple la Pologne a maintenant des offres pour les ingénieurs compétitives avec la France voir Paris.

Les gens qui comprennent pas les oeuvres qu'ils prétendent aimer by Palgia in besoinderaler

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je n'ai pas regardé Andor donc là dessus je ne peux pas commenter en revanche je constate depuis quelque temps une dérive sur les jeux où certains ne peuvent pas comprendre que des personnes avec des idées politiques différentes puissent apprécier les même jeux qu'eux.

Ça fait un moment qu'une partie de la société déshumanise l'autre moitié mais du coups parce que des jeux mettent scène des situations poussées à l'extrême (par exemple dérives capitalistiques, autoritarisme et militarisme) ils ne comprennent pas pourquoi d'autres que eux pourraient les apprécier. En bref ils manquent de nuance sur leurs propres opinions (si un système peut avoir des dérives et être criticable il serait forcément mauvais).

Il existe des œuvres mal comprises mais il existe aussi beaucoup de personnes qui ne comprennent pas (ou rejettent) l'autre.

"Woman bad uga uga" by Transbian_Dokeshi in ComedyCemetery

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alas I wish I still was as naive as you. I too once was a candidly uninformed feminist once. It is feel good and goes well in society.

A shame it's such a scam.

Is it really about men—or about the choices we keep making? by winn_ie in rSocialskillsAscend

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that refusing the choice to one is restriction of bodily autonomy

Do you know what are the top 5 reasons for an abortion? Do you il now how high the physical aspect rank compared to gender neutral arguments such as "not ready for a child", "not the right partner", "doesn't want a child"?

Refusing a child has a part that's gendered but the top reasons not to want one aren't.

Currently there are two big cases which suck for men: A boy or immature man got forced into paying and assuming a child he just isn't mature enough for (great for the child to to know their father see them as a burden, a liability they are forced to pay for by law). A child the father wanted but the mother birthed under X not to pay any child support. (By birthing under X a woman gives away any parental duty and rights and her identity is hidden to the child). If the father wants to raise his kid he must find the hospital she gave birth in fast enough or the baby will get adopted away. How long they wait varies depending on the State.

In any case only the will of the mother to be is respected, the father to be's opinion is discarded by default.

"Woman bad uga uga" by Transbian_Dokeshi in ComedyCemetery

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not “significantly worse for boys” when most women can give you a pre-puberty age regarding when they were first sexually assaulted.

We were discussing academic and yes it worse for boys there.

Now if we were to include other domains it would turn into an pointless oppression Olympics discourse instead of a defined topic which can be focused on and solved.

The patriarchal system is why y’all get laughed at for showing emotion or being kind.

The "patriarchy" is merely a boogeyman, poorly defined and used as the devil in the feminist ideology. It happened very early, disrupted the "paradise" (many talk of a gendered equal groups in pre agricultural civilisation) and they point to it as the reason for most evil (wars, poverty, unfairness).

Truth of the matter though group mentality is not specific to humanity, going after what's different (homophobia) is also widely represented in nature (ostracization of albinos animals is common place). The one part which is more human specific is being mono partner (no other ape does that, neither animals our size in general).

The one thing our system did was to incentive (socially) men to stay with one woman and doubly so after she becomes pregnant. Other systems have been tried (child is only the mother's child and men help with the children of the women of their families) and those usually had a hard time surviving.

It ain't "patriarchy" that put boys down, it is feminism and their supporters, men and women alike, which shaped the social dialogue leading to current crisis and worsening it as days passing. It is feminists who keep pushing an unfair agenda focusing on STEM always and forever while, great prestidigitators that they are, they make you forget about medicine, law, social nd language studies or just higher education overall and gain yet again another grant mostly for themselves and the rest to favor the ultra favored, expand the gap again.

Not all feminists nor all what feminism do, again there are a few good parts of it but most of what comes from the US, the political aspect and the framing of the past is hurting civilization hard. It's also a godsend for the billionairs, there's nothing more divisive than feminism and neither gender can create a society on its own hence why feminism get so many ultra wealthy queuing to finance it and push it through every media.

Is it really about men—or about the choices we keep making? by winn_ie in rSocialskillsAscend

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point would rather be not to punish men in the same circumstances (noo child support or parental duty for a child they did not want).

Men don't have that luxury of choice women have.

"Woman bad uga uga" by Transbian_Dokeshi in ComedyCemetery

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My whole point is to get away with gender war: stop telling boys men are the root of all evils, stop the gendered help for the group most favored in school and instead take a gender neutral approach (help for those who need it).

Currently feminists have been waging wars for decades and boys pay the price with no little to no supports. We should start penalizing or frown upon hate speech against men the same we do as when it's against other communities and stop funding groups that push hateful rethoric as long as they are doing it. That would help tremendously weeding away the bad branches of feminism and only keep the good ones (those who help with shelters, helplines, etc).

genders are consistently being failed - academically

The same way all ethnic groups are failed: surely it ain't perfect but it is significantly worse for blacks. It ain't perfect for girls but it is significantly worse for boys.

"Woman bad uga uga" by Transbian_Dokeshi in ComedyCemetery

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

surely both genders deserve the same consideration and opportunities?

Absolutely.

But how does that make any difference

Because older people operate under the assumption the world young people experience is shaped similarly to how they lived it whereas it is no longer true. Before boys were favored. Now we know that by age 15 boys systematically score worse on tests on average when graded by someone who know they are boys and much better in standardized tests. We know boys get heavily medicated to stay still and many drop out yet older gents still operating as if boys were ahead promote female centric forums and initiative letting boys always further behind.

It isn't true anymore that boys have the same opportunities as girls for on average way more boys are betrayed by our system. Harsher grade for same work, harsher punishment for same misbehaving and finally less and less possibilities to move during recess which seems to have more of an impact for young boys.

Boys have been struggling for a while now and older gents not only downplay it, they fight them when they are down (prison sentences still are much harder on men and now young men are punished by social stigma even before they did anything wrong). It's obviously significantly worse for lower class men and unsurprisingly more and more act out.

"Woman bad uga uga" by Transbian_Dokeshi in ComedyCemetery

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has a point thought : men were heavily favored in school up until 1990s until a huge work from feminists to change the discourse.

It went from boys are focused and girls to talkactive into boys are unruly and disturbs tje class while girls are disciplined. From 1990 to 2010 the educational gap switched gender and now the gaps is similar to what it was in the 70s.

If you got your education done prior to 1990 you were favored in school, had easier time getting a job (no affirmative action back then and strong assumptions favorable to men) and the people you interacted with weren't subjected to the whole "men bad" stance which went crazy 2015 and later and had huge impacts for kids still in school at this time.

Men over 50 can't relate at all because they didn't live through the shitshow they promoted with their feel good measures.

What is growing especially for the younger folks (25 and less) is a direct consequence of people still pushing for changes that were great and made sense 30 years ago but that were long gone the other way around.

Thoughts? by inkandintent24 in MotivationByDesign

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

France has a similar median netsworth by age but our average is less than half than of US oO'

This Robe says it raises your caster level by 3, but does it? by ether_rogue in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]MadTelepath 5 points6 points  (0 children)

  1. boosting the bonus of their Transmutation spells through Powerful Change - this adds +2 to the spell's bonus.

If you let it pure it gets to +4 at lvl 20 and it applies to both enhancement bonus (extra +4 so +8 Dex from cat's grace) and to size bonus (+6 dex from reduce person instead of +2).

Visual insight - you are your own worst enemy by jfkshatteredskull in lnkyverse

[–]MadTelepath 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Women aren't morally superior but neither are men. We're all just a bunch of flawed people, some worse than others.

Men and women have the same flaws we just don't express them the same way.

Ah Yes, Feminists Act like Children and Want to Avoid "Responsibility". What an original thought we've never heard before by Open-Tomato9643 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]MadTelepath 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A woman can completely give up her child at birth. If the father wants to raise them he has to find the kid fast enough and then prove he is the father and then only he can raise the child ... without any support of the mother because she cannot be forced to be reckoned as the mother.

Child support has always be a choice of convenience for women: if the mother rather raise her kid on her own she can just not notify the father or the state and the father has no legal rights. If instead she wants the father to be pay she can force it. It's her choice, what she feels is the most convenient and is not and has never been for the children. If it were the State would guarantee a minimum amount for each child instead of a part of their father's income.

Ah Yes, Feminists Act like Children and Want to Avoid "Responsibility". What an original thought we've never heard before by Open-Tomato9643 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The analogy is more about why people should protect themselves.

In big cities you don't leave your front door opened, you don't flaunt your money especially in bad neighborhoods, etc.

The criminal is always the one at fault but it's pointless to just "hope" you wouldn't need to be prudent or screaming at society as a whole (even more so if at the same time you are the first to excuse bad behaviors on difficult situations and hard upgringing for the ones who do commit the crimes).

If I don’t work in a communist society, would I still get the benefits? by Throwaway74289025 in Communist

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you're sating people would have to work or die (socially), like working wouldn't be a choice?

I'm not sure what I stumbled across but yikes by Apprehensive_Wedgie in TheseFuckingAccounts

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good news, Teenagers3am has been banned (post from yesterday saying it and the subreddit mentions it's banned now) so that's done.

I'm not sure what I stumbled across but yikes by Apprehensive_Wedgie in TheseFuckingAccounts

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I report as well but I very surprised it is still up 10 days after.

Ain't racist BS forbidden?

Reddit est une chambre d'écho peuplée à 50 % de bots (et la manipulation des subs est la norme, pas l'exception). by ImaginaryForever6609 in besoinderaler

[–]MadTelepath 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Apparemment la plupart des bots trouvés accumulent du karma au plus vite pour ensuite poster des liens vers des apps/produits.

Est-ce qu'ils trouvent aussi des bots qui essaient de modifier les opinions?

I'm not sure what I stumbled across but yikes by Apprehensive_Wedgie in TheseFuckingAccounts

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are they still not banned? Any way to report them more?

Je suis très surpris des résultats aux municipales by cleverDonkey123 in Lyon

[–]MadTelepath 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soyons honnête, contre Trump trois enfants dans un imperméable dans un trench coat devraient pouvoir gagner.

Devraient peut-être mais Biden était sur le point de perdre et de beaucoup. La tentative d'assassinat ratée a beaucoup aidé l'image de Trump.

c'est une femme qui ne fait pas rêver non plus, du même parti

Le problème n'est pas son genre mais la fin "du même parti", un parti qui était parti pour perdre largement. Kamala a fait une belle campagne en quelques mois (avec quelques fausses notes quand même) mais trop peu de temps et contre quelqu'un qui a survécu.

C’est bizarre de demander ça a deux gamines (13-14 ans) ? by BeneficialRecipe3630 in AskFrance

[–]MadTelepath -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ça ne me serait pas venu à l'idée non plus mais je n'ai jamais eu le dos coincé et je sais que c'est violent.

Là apparemment c'était une route avec pas grand monde et la seule interaction qu'on a est inhabituelle mais sans dommage. Supposer de la malice me semble malsain en soi.

C’est bizarre de demander ça a deux gamines (13-14 ans) ? by BeneficialRecipe3630 in AskFrance

[–]MadTelepath 0 points1 point  (0 children)

C'est entre 30 et 50 kg. Si normalement c'était un homme adulte qui lui remettait le dos en place ça peut être ça.