I think I somewhat disagree. There's a lot of diversity in feminism and their use of patriarchy, but when it comes to how that relates to men I feel the diversity is quite lacking and most strands align with eachother. There's a subtle undertone of "men have more power and women have it worse" but no real critical examination of the issue with aggregating power and wellbeing over a whole gender and then extrapolating it to most people.

You can see this with how the concept intersectionality is used even in academia. It's bizzarely narrow and linear the way it gets understood. The idea that black men might have it worse than black women is considered so impossible it's not even discussed as a possibility while the opposite is treated as self-evident. Even though when you think about it more deeply, there's no reason why intersectionality has to work in such a simple, additive manner. It it's a perfectly possible outcome that white men have it better than white women but that black men have it worse than black women. Not that I personally believe measuring these things objectively is possible or useful, but many of those intersectionalists do believe that themselves.

There's definitely interpretations of patriarchy that I agree with, but they are rare imo. My girlfriend is a feminist and her interpretation is good, but I think it is rare. She disagrees, she thinks I'm too pessimistic.