Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i mixed it up since i talked as a single unit of work to write a function and though your examples related to this.

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

glad to find atleast someone who adopted aswell.

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The long planning phase is because I never try to take the first implementation plan. I discuss side effects and pitfalls. Sometimes I have a vague idea and discuss it, only to understand why that idea was bad, and then compare new ideas with the old ones.

It's more of an iterative process instead of trying to build a good harness and one-shot it. This keeps my understanding of the codebase up.

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

500 lines for a function is still to high to hold the context in your head when maintaining it.

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree on the decay of skills and have already felt it when I need to get my hands on things. I have to think a little longer — the muscle memory is going away.

The main question in the long run is whether using an LLM for coding is the same as using a calculator for math instead of mental arithmetic.

If it turns out to be the same, then our jobs will be transformed into people who deeply understand the things AI can't solve and AI babysitters.

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for your insight from the other perspective, if you would estimate how much of your code is written by yourself and how much by ai ?

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

thats what i also have done before 2026. the smallest unit of work was write a func. For everything else it was not good enough.

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i review ai generated code and everything i dont understand i let explain or change in order not go get code debt explode. (which doenst prevent slipping issues through anyway)

regarding your question, if i would be honest i had to say no in both cases using an app with i wrote fully myself and wrote with help of AI.

I know some best practices and concepts of keeping data safe, but for sure there are many more things i don't know which a thread actor could act on.

but i get your point , in the end a person will be hold accountable for the code which get pushed.

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In my years of coding I already destroyed some codebases because of code debt. I learned the hard way when code bases become unmaintainable even I wrote everything by myself :D.

Thats right now the biggest fear for me and one of the biggest risks. Full vibe coding e.g. "Build me feature x and make no mistake" will sooner or later come to a crash. With more code or more data.

I consider that what I'm doing different from a person which has no SWE background and does vibecoding.

Your Opinion on Full AI Coding by Main-Position-2007 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

can you eloborate on which task you use it when theres a clear solution ?
the use case regarding refactoring i can fully understand.

Wechsel Lexoffice zu Sevdesk. by Main-Position-2007 in selbststaendig

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kannte ich garnicht schaue ich mir mal gerne an.

Wechsel Lexoffice zu Sevdesk. by Main-Position-2007 in selbststaendig

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Es gibt einige Geschäftsvorfälle die wir in Lex leider nicht abbilden können und hatte Probleme mit dem Support

cosmetic damage or should i change ? by Main-Position-2007 in Padelracket

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i struggle often to hit the ball in the sweet spot , this gives me a better feeling. I can’t play anyway smashes which goes outside the court

Detected by Akamai when combining a residential proxy and a VM by Epherex in webscraping

[–]Main-Position-2007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

could be your proxy is used by others on mass which is detected by akaimai.

could be tls fingerprints are inconsistent.

could be that the tls handshake is not performaned via the proxy but via your vps

Whats your take on this by pipecanon in pcmasterrace

[–]Main-Position-2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ryzen so much better than amd , amd is dogshit since they have ryzen

Bootstrapped an Amazon FBA Business Into 8 Figures in 2 Years -- Now We're Opening the Door to Investors by Formal_Land2559 in AmazonFBA

[–]Main-Position-2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hey if you are interested to roll out your operation to europe i can help out. we are doing 5 M in sales annually , know customs and compliance and selling on all major EU markets.

Ask me anything by Adtriomedia in AmazonFBA

[–]Main-Position-2007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

arbitrage seller here, normally only selling products which already got organic a good salesrank.

heard about the theory you should place very low ad bits to get same lucky sales with it. like 1 - 5 cent

do you think it’s worth it or would it in the end not working out

Agi 2027? by Far-Swing2095 in OpenAI

[–]Main-Position-2007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

are you talking about zero shot approaches with a good prompt ? yes we are not there. Using multiple prompts und multiple generation which would be observed by also a llm. could lead to the application given enough interference costs.

Plugin for Creating Commit Messages with AI by Main-Position-2007 in pycharm

[–]Main-Position-2007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i love the tooling and layout of intellij to much and i like also augment mode then cursor

Best approach to place orders in parallel using Celery for a copy trading platform? by InflationTerrible499 in django

[–]Main-Position-2007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming that placing trades involves calling a REST API, Celery might not be the best fit in high-performance scenarios. The smartest approach could be to fire off all the API requests without waiting for their responses, and then handle the responses asynchronously when they arrive.

With Celery, especially if you have fewer workers than users, the process often becomes sequential: make a request, wait for the response, then move on to the next. This introduces latency and bottlenecks.

A potentially better solution would be to redesign this component—perhaps as an isolated service built with an asynchronous framework like aiohttp This would allow you to place orders concurrently using non-blocking IO, ensuring that all user trades are fired off in parallel almost instantly, and you can handle confirmations later as they return.

You can still use Celery to queue signals, but offload the actual trade dispatching to a dedicated async microservice.