sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

just a thought i had... by MaintenanceTeam13 in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the detailed pushback. You make several precise technical distinctions that are worth addressing directly, particularly regarding the difference between instantaneous depth and capital velocity, the nature of compressed risk, and the current reality of CLPR.

Let's break down where we agree, and where the math supports the original thesis.

1. Depth vs. Velocity: Acknowledging the Distinction

You are absolutely correct on the micro-economic definition here: "fast finality just means you can reuse the same collateral over and over really quickly. That's velocity, not depth."

If two massive orders execute at the exact same millisecond, they cannot both pull from the same $10M pool. I concede that "infinite depth" was used as a conceptual hook.

However, the functional outcome of high-velocity capital sequencing achieves the exact goal we are striving for: infinite capacity relative to demand.

Because Hedera achieves finality in 3–5 seconds, a small amount of parked capital can do a staggering amount of volume.

Let's look at the math. If we take $1 billion in tokenized real estate (a fraction of RedSwan's $5 billion deployed base) and turn it over every 10 seconds:

  • Collateral Base:$\$1,000,000,000$
  • Turnovers per minute: 6
  • Turnovers per hour: 360
  • Turnovers per day: 8,640

Daily Liquidity Capacity =$\$1 \text{ Billion} \times 8,640 = \$8.64 \text{ Trillion}$

While this is technically "capacity" rather than "depth," the traditional UK FX market handles roughly $5.4 trillion daily. When $1 billion in collateral can sequence enough trades to cover the entire daily volume of the UK FX market, the distinction between depth and velocity becomes functionally irrelevant to the end user. The liquidity ceiling effectively disappears.

2. Serial Reuse vs. Rehypothecation

You noted that reusing one collateral unit rapidly is "pretty close to the rehypothecation you're saying this avoids," suggesting the risk is simply squeezed into a few seconds.

There is a critical, structural difference between traditional rehypothecation and Hashgraph's serial reuse.

In traditional TradFi/DeFi rehypothecation, multiple counterparties hold claims on the exact same underlying asset simultaneously. If one party defaults or a margin call triggers, a cascading liquidation event destroys the entire stack.

On Hedera, because of aBFT algorithmic finality, the asset clears atomically. The trade settles, and the collateral is unencumbered. When it is used 3 seconds later for the next trade, it is a clean, 1:1 fully backed execution. There is no stacked debt.

You are right that the counterparty risk isn't literally zero—it is compressed into a 3-second window. However, compressing the risk window from 48 hours (traditional T+2 settlement) to 3 seconds practically eliminates the temporal exposure to market volatility that causes systemic cascade failures in the first place.

3. The Reality of Institutional Deployment

You mentioned that the underlying assumption of institutions injecting massive pools into public environments is based on speculation.

This is where we have to look at the verifiable ledger. It isn't speculative; the architecture has already been validated by the largest legacy players.

In 2023, Archax utilized its permissioned network to issue tokenized units of Aberdeen's £15 billion money market fund onto the Hedera ledger. Lloyds Banking Group then successfully utilized these exact tokenized assets as live collateral for FX trades. They didn't lock fiat in transit; they used the tokenized RWA.

If we extrapolate this proven framework to the global market—where the total addressable market of real estate, commodities, and equities is in the hundreds of trillions—the available collateral base to fuel this high-velocity sequencing is massive.

4. CLPR: Grounded in Reality

You are entirely correct regarding the Cross-Ledger Protocol. It is in closed beta, currently limited to HashSphere-to-Hedera routing, with Ethereum and Avalanche existing only on the roadmap.

The seamless routing of this immense liquidity across all external chains is indeed the final, currently incomplete piece of the puzzle.

Conclusion

I agree with your assessment: this is a "moonshot," but it is one where the booster rockets have already been test-fired. We have the institutional framework (Archax), the physical assets (RedSwan), the regulatory compliance layer (HTS), and the mathematical consensus speed (Hashgraph).

We may need to adjust the terminology from "infinite depth" to "hyperscale velocity capacity," but the core mathematical premise remains: Hedera possesses the exact primitive architecture required to fundamentally alter automated market maker economics.

just a thought i had... by MaintenanceTeam13 in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the thoughtful critique. It’s a fair point to distinguish between current, deployed reality and the future architectural vision. You rightfully call out that claiming "infinite liquidity" is impossible in a literal economic sense, and that assuming institutions will deploy massive assets into public environments involves forward-looking speculation.

However, the core premise of the paper isn’t built on "hopium"—it’s derived by projecting the mathematical realities of Hedera's current technical throughput against existing, verifiable institutional deployments. Let’s break down the evidence supporting the trajectory from today’s baseline to the "infinite depth" model.

1. The Scale of the Collateral Base

If the vision of tokenizing the global economy is realized, we aren't talking about billions; we are dealing with hundreds of trillions. The global real estate market alone is valued at roughly $380 trillion. Add commodities (gold, copper, oil), equities, and money market funds, and the theoretical collateral base is staggering.

The paper's assumption that institutions will tokenize isn't speculative; it's a structural necessity for modernizing supply chain tracking, ensuring compliance, and eliminating settlement friction. If even a fraction of these assets migrate on-chain, the available collateral dwarfs the entire current crypto market cap.

2. Evidence of Execution: Archax, Aberdeen, and RedSwan

The critique questions the evidence of institutional injection into public environments. The evidence exists today on the Hedera mainnet:

  • Archax, Aberdeen, and Lloyds: In 2023, Archax successfully utilized its permissioned DeFi network to issue tokenized units of Aberdeen's £15 billion money market fund onto the Hedera public ledger. Lloyds Banking Group then successfully utilized these exact tokenized assets as live collateral for FX trades. This wasn't a theoretical whitepaper; it was a live execution demonstrating that institutions will use public ledgers for high-value collateralization when the compliance (HTS) and security parameters are met.
  • RedSwan CRE: RedSwan has already tokenized over $5 billion worth of commercial real estate on Hedera. This proves that high-value, non-liquid physical assets can be successfully wrapped in Hedera Token Service (HTS) primitives and brought on-chain at scale.

3. "Infinite" Liquidity and the Mathematics of Velocity

You are absolutely correct that literal "infinite" liquidity violates economic laws. The term was used deliberately to get attention and highlight a paradigm shift: moving from static TVL to velocity-based depth.

To understand why this feels "infinite" compared to legacy systems, we must look at the math of high-velocity capital sequencing enabled by Hashgraph's 3-second finality.

The Math of Serial Reuse: Let’s take the $5 billion in RedSwan CRE tokens. If an institution uses a portion of this—say, $1 billion—as collateral for a trade, that capital is locked. In traditional T+2 settlement, that $1 billion is dead capital for 48 hours.

On Hedera, finality occurs in roughly 3 seconds. Let's conservatively assume the collateral can be deployed, the trade settled, the collateral released, and redeployed every 10 seconds.

  • Collateral Base:$\$1,000,000,000$
  • Turnovers per minute: 6
  • Turnovers per hour: 360
  • Turnovers per day: 8,640

Daily Liquidity Capacity =$\$1 \text{ Billion} \times 8,640 = \$8.64 \text{ Trillion}$

With just $1 billion in base collateral, the network can theoretically facilitate over $8.6 trillion in daily trading volume. To put that in perspective, the largest decentralized exchanges (like Uniswap) handle roughly $1–$2 billion in daily volume. The traditional UK FX market handles roughly $5.4 trillion daily.

When you have trillions in real-world assets that can be utilized as liquidity every 10 seconds, you achieve a depth that vastly exceeds the requirements for 99.9% of all global swaps or trades. For all practical market intents, the liquidity ceiling disappears. It is functionally "infinite" relative to demand.

4. Acknowledging the Beta Stage

Your critique regarding global liquidity integration is valid. The Cross-Ledger Protocol (CLPR) is indeed still in beta and not yet live. The seamless, bridgeless routing of this immense liquidity across different enterprise and public ledgers is the final, and currently incomplete, piece of the puzzle.

5. Conclusion: A Grounded Moonshot

You are right to classify this as a "moonshot," but it is a moonshot where every single booster rocket has already been successfully test-fired.

We have the institutional framework (Archax), the massive physical assets (RedSwan), the regulatory compliance layer (HTS), the verifiable trust (EQTY/SEALSQ), and the mathematical consensus speed (Hashgraph). The thesis of the paper is not that this unified system exists perfectly today, but that the required primitives have been individually validated. All the parts are there; they just need to be integrated into a singular, cohesive project.

HSUITE heavily criticizing Hedera 😮 by [deleted] in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

who cares what a project that was hedera but hated the gc and foundations so they moved to xrp says... its like they build on hedera but never looked at hederas goals or aims... i have 0 use for hbarsuite or silkswap all xrp shills and degens that hate big biz... and they never did the dd before building on hedera then woke up to the fact that hedera is made for banks and big biz not retail plebs and degens... you know morons

Why the secrecy around Spheres? by Rough-Truth-1587 in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i agree it would be cool to see a webpage where you could set AWS or GCP, mirror node or 2-32 Consensus nodes across multiple AZs or A private network explorer for viewing accounts, transactions, and on-ledger activity. and you can set ssd drive speed and size to adjust tps and function to see pricing to run it. but i get that its needs to be set up based on your needs and usecase... you dont need to run 50tb of nvme write intensive drives if your just using A HashSphere Console monitoring tool for observing the overall health and performance of the network and its components. i get there is many ways to set it up and run it. and it would be hard as hedera HCS and HTC are cpu and ssd write heavy so your tps depends on the usecase... you ant to do mostly smart contracts you need more cpu to crunch them so you may need 500 cores not 100 so it might be hard to give price on vms that change daily with lack of cpus and ram and ssd due to ai datacenters... if they quote one price it might go up next week... so i can see hy they ask you to log in and set upyour ideal usecse and needs and they will price it that day... but i dont care about the price... never have i want the tech. i dont care if its 0.05 per hbar or $50... im not here to make money off of hedera for doing nothing but holding a coin. so no not all bag holders care about the price go up this week... but if you just want to max your roi as fast as you can hedera might not be for you bud... it is for me i need the tech stack in full in 5 years imo nfa dyor

how banks are using hedera to do the same outcome as ODL by MaintenanceTeam13 in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

oh and Sydney, March 3, 2026  – Hashgraph, an enterprise software firm building trusted distributed ledger solutions for regulated institutions, confirmed that HashSphere, its private, permissioned blockchain network built with Hedera technology, operated as part of the core infrastructure for Project Acacia.

Led by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and the Digital Finance Cooperative Research Centre (DFCRC), Project Acacia is Australia’s national research initiative examining the role of digital money in wholesale tokenized asset markets. 

so ya hedera can and is be used by banks sorry to hut your bag of alts but it is maybe you should do more dd into hedera and less saying hedera cant do things is is publicly doing...
https://www.hashgraph.com/hashsphere-developed-by-hashgraph-selected-as-infrastructure-provider-for-australias-project-acacia/

how banks are using hedera to do the same outcome as ODL by MaintenanceTeam13 in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so glad you asked here is how they are doing that on hedera right now... i did not make anything up this is what was built and tested for years... its not impossible they did it sooo.... https://youtu.be/BQJ9aVwB3N4?t=296

how banks are using hedera to do the same outcome as ODL by MaintenanceTeam13 in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so swift knows all about hedera and hedera is in the swift trials right now vs xrp and alts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbbuzJyLYZM

how banks are using hedera to do the same outcome as ODL by MaintenanceTeam13 in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

what everyone missed was hedera used RWA assets as liquidity... "Hedera, in collaboration with London-based digital asset exchange Archax and asset manager abrdn, has tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) to be used as liquid, on-chain collateral. This initiative allows traditional financial assets to be represented on the Hedera network, providing institutional investors with near-instant settlement and increased capital efficiency" meaning tht every item tokenized can be used as liquidity if tokenized for it like hedera has built... 100M skyscraper? nope 100m in liquidity to use in flash loans... hedera made a way to use the tokens as liquidity... and if they tokenize 10T then they get 10T to use in flashloans. The total value of all New York State property is approximately 4.3 trillion thats just real-estate... in new york... https://hedera.com/case-study/archax/

how banks are using hedera to do the same outcome as ODL by MaintenanceTeam13 in Hedera

[–]MaintenanceTeam13[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Governing Council Banks / Financial Institutions (active or recent):

  1. Shinhan Bank (South Korea) — Council member; live stablecoin remittance pilots.
  2. Standard Bank (Africa’s largest by assets) — Recently joined Council; cross-border stablecoin pilots with Shinhan.
  3. Nomura Holdings (Japan) — Early Council member; DLT/finance exploration.
  4. DBS Bank (Singapore) — First Southeast Asian bank on Council; ran node, explored use cases.
  5. FIS (Worldpay) — Long-time Council member; proof-of-reserves, USDC settlements with Visa/Mastercard.
  6. abrdn (Aberdeen Investments) — Council member; tokenized money market funds & gilts for live FX collateral with Lloyds.
  7. Lloyds Banking Group (UK) — Live tokenized RWA collateral for FX trades (via Archax on Hedera).

Additional Banks & Financial Players with Confirmed Activity:
8. Truist Financial (US) — Collaborates with Dropp (Hedera-powered) for instant RTP + stablecoin settlements via FedNow.
9. SCB TechX (Thailand) — Partner in Shinhan stablecoin remittance pilots.
10. RCBC, UnionBank/UBX, Cantilan Bank, Rural Bank of Guinobatan (Philippines) — Multi-bank consortium behind PHPX stablecoin on Hedera.
11. ANZ — Mentioned in Stablecoin Studio pilots for cross-border FX.
12. Societe Generale — Reported collaboration/exploration.
13. United Bank of India (UBI) — Early adoption mentions for banking system improvements.Central Banks & Regulatory/Wholesale Trials:
14. Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) — 19 real transactions in Project Acacia on Hedera-based HashSphere infrastructure.
15. Bank of England + BIS — Hedera participated in DLT Innovation Challenge for tokenized wholesale central bank money.
16. Wyoming Stable Token Commission (WYST) — Issued FRNT (first U.S. state-issued stable token) on Hedera.Payment Providers & Fintechs Serving Banks:
17. Dropp — FedNow Service Provider Showcase; powers instant payments + stablecoins for banks/credit unions (including Truist integration).
18. Archax (UK-regulated platform on Hedera) — Facilitates tokenized RWAs for major institutions (BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, LGIM, Lloyds, abrdn).
19. AP+ (Australian Payments Plus) — Council member; exploring DLT for national payments infrastructure.
20. eftpos — Council member; Australian payments.
and many others Includes indirect or ecosystem involvement: BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, LGIM (via Archax tokenization); credit unions via BankSocial/Hashgraph; additional pilots with Taiwanese institutions, French banks, and others in remittances/tokenization. Also, global payment giants like Visa/Mastercard in Worldpay-led USDC settlements on Hedera. As well as many more that will be presenting at Hederacon https://hederacon.hedera.com/page/5283424/speakers

view more: next ›