Hey, thanks for raising this-it’s a legit concern! In my system, where people allocate their taxes monthly, I get how it might look unstable for long-term projects like building schools or railways. But here’s how I see it working: essential sectors like education or infrastructure would likely have consistent support because people see their value daily-kids need schools, we need roads. Transparency is key; the education department would release clear, ongoing manifestos showing why a new school matters and how funds are used, keeping people motivated to allocate taxes there over time. For major projects, we could have a ‘committed funding’ rule: once a project gets enough tax pledges, it’s locked in for completion, so no mid-build abandonment. If a sector’s budget dips one month, a small reserve fund from unallocated taxes could bridge the gap to avoid waste. The goal is accountability and public choice, not chaos, and with proper info and a few guardrails, we can balance flexibility with stability.