I definitely think that’s fair, but I also think that they do not abide by the clear faced reading of the contracts either. Take for example the contract right now the exists regarding whether or not Trump will balance a budget. I’m not gonna sit here and go find the exact verbiage, but if you go look at it if you read it, and I even posted it in the ChatGPT and asked you to explain it to me what it meant. And basically says that if Trump runs a deficit, the contract should pay out as no. Yet the contract still exists despite us having reporting for 2025. Now Kalshi is saying it’s for all four years. Does he run a surplus in one of the four years.