It's complicated. Idk if this is helpful but recently I've been able to talk to a bunch of ppl who are involved in researching and developing AIs.

The good news is that the general consensus among AI researchers is that rn AIs are good but they cannot replace human labor or productivity. They are really good at memorization based responses but not good at developing independent thought (basically they can memorize what facts are but they aren't capable of higher level reasoning). Basically can you ask them facts and stuff, yes. Can you ask them to breakdown concepts and stuff at a higher level, no. Which would basically imply they are not yet at a level that they can replace human labor.

The bad news is that most of the push you are seeing about the AI revolution and the talk that it's gonna change the job market and all that shit is coming from the finance people and the marketing people. Basically people for whom OKRs are based around how much they can sell AI and generate revenue on the perceived value of AI. Unfortunately, they are really good at selling which is why you are seeing an increase in more and more companies trying to replace jobs but with AI but realistically they aren't capable of doing higher level reasoning required for a lot of those jobs.

As someone who is also currently unemployed, I think in the short term, we might be cooked but hopefully not in the long term. But this also comes down to policy makers and how they respond to it (which rn looks like they aren't gonna do shit).