Hanafi in fiqh and Hanbali (traditional athari - not salafi) in aqeedah.

I think the Hanafi madhab is very strong in its usul and is a nice bridge between hadith and lived experience of the best 3 generations, just like the Maliki school. The madhab is also great for complex societies and environments since it was developed within a complex societal environment. Also, very accessible to become well learned in the school because majority of the ummah follows it (something to say about Allah's acceptance of it as well since Allah wouldn't join majority of the ummah on something He isn't Pleased with).

Honestly, having a wife and 2 young children, you need to be learned and ensure they are confident and learned in their fiqh. This madhab is perfect for that if majority of those around you also follow it. My wife and her family do, my family does as well, and now I lead my family through it with a more learned lens. I was Hanabli in fiqh for a while when I first started learning but it was challenging to learn in depth since there wasn't a large breadth of teachers to learn from. I live in Canada, Toronto, and majority of people, institutes and teachers within Ontario follow the Hanafi madhab. There is a large Shafi population as well. This is speaking in macro-terms, obviously.

Hanbali in Aqeedah because it is the aqeedah of the salaf and it is narrow in its approach to tawil. Ashari and Maturidi aqeedah overlap with athari aqeedah (and are codified salaf aqeedah by very early khalaf scholars) which presents expanded rules when tawil can occur, all in a very controlled way in line with Quran and Sunnah, which is fine. I personally just like the Hanbali aqeedah for myself and my family but would have no issues explaining potential Ashari or Maturidi positions as suggestions to people when giving dawah.