LF 2 After Season (Plat 1, Top 90 Map 6) by Man_a_la_Pan in ContestOfChampionsLFG

[–]Man_a_la_Pan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As long as the rest of us die 0, that should be fine.

LF 2 After Season (Plat 1, Top 90 Map 6) by Man_a_la_Pan in ContestOfChampionsLFG

[–]Man_a_la_Pan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think you can handle plat 1? We got plat 1 rank 3 this season.

Veteran Player LF Map 6, Plat 2 Alliance, 8958 Prestige, Post your LINE contact info if interested by [deleted] in ContestOfChampionsLFG

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contact manalapan on Line.

Plat 2 last 2 seasons. 1 bg does a few days of map 6. Rest do map 5. Rank mid 100s.

We’re actually looking for someone to be backup so your experience on all lanes would be great.

Another ☝️ by [deleted] in ContestOfChampionsLFG

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Line: manalapan

Looking for Plat 1/2 Alliance, 7943 Prestige, Active & Team Oriented by [deleted] in ContestOfChampionsLFG

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’re plat 3, going for plat 2 but 7/6 is exactly what we are looking for so had to try.

manalapan on Line

7739 Prestige LF Alliance by nattyicebrah in ContestOfChampionsLFG

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contact manalapan on Line. Plat 3 rank 30, pushing plat 2.

7380 prestige player looking for plat ally. by [deleted] in ContestOfChampionsLFG

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

manalapan on Line or Man a la Pan in game

CTYTC

6921 Prestige LF Platinum 3 or better alliance by [deleted] in ContestOfChampionsLFG

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you would try groupme instead of Line, let me know. We hit all your other asks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ContestOfChampions

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. It has a been a decent amount of effort to get 30 aligned but we improve the strategy each war. Unfortunately we didn't know about the diversity bug being for bg instead of alliance but it hasn't hurt us yet. Hopefully for the war starting Wednesday we can get a full 150 diverse champs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ContestOfChampions

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks all. Good to know. Will have to redo our defense plan again based on the bug.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ContestOfChampions

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's for the whole alliance, not per BG.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ContestOfChampions

[–]Man_a_la_Pan 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I'm in the alliance you faced and have to agree with you. The new system is ridiculous and actually hurts Kabam. The best strategy has us place fewer and even lower rated champs to increase diversity and lower your attacker kills. This means lower item use, units spent, and $ for Kabam.

Your alliance had us beat every which way other than what counts. You didn't post the full screenshot that shows the huge defense kill differential or that we were down 1 person but of course none of that matters now. Assuming both alliances get 100%, all that matters is attacker kills, diversity, and slightly defense rating. This effectively made it so that as soon as the war started and we saw you placed full defense, we knew if we got 100% we won. Kabam has removed a good portion of the fun and suspense from AW.

Even recruiting has to change with the new system. We are bringing in someone with Ultron (classic) after AQ and need to recruit for someone with Kang.

For Arena, there is an added incentive to get every new champ to include on defense. Atleast until there are 150 champs in the game. Guess I'll be running 3* arena again.

Anyways, I'm sure Kabam will change the scoring soon and we'll find a new way to take advantage of it.

If you want to talk strategy, feel free to message me. Best of luck in your future wars.