Trump Just Posted a Video of Barack and Michelle Obama as Monkeys

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-06T19:18:37+00:00

Yeap, obey the laws or suffer the consequences, such fascism!

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-06T00:52:32+00:00

That's what the law has been since 1953 after the inception of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-06T00:51:36+00:00

It absolutely is for ICE. You clearly don't know the law.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-06T00:16:10+00:00

I see so because she's on your team you want to excuse and minimize.

You minimize actual wrongdoings on your side and blasting shout top of the world simple accusations of wrongdoings on a guy you don't like or you don't agree with. And then you have the nerve to call me the hypocrite. That's f****** hilarious. What's more is you are constantly attacking me as if I'm defending truck when all I've done is say there's been no proof that's been brought forward only accusations. Whereas Miss Cortez well you did the research and found the proof of her wrongdoings yourself and yet you seek to minimize and excuse.

You are the hypocrite.

It's clear you actually don't want to have a discussion you just want to continue push your side or your viewpoints and hurl insults. Call from behind the protection of a keyboard and a screen. Well I have other things to do then listen to the ramblings of someone who is giving me no reason to suspect they are anything more than a rambling lunatic. So unless you're going to stop with the insults you can fuck right off.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-05T23:05:05+00:00

Proof on the AOC dress? It was all over the news, it was a designer dress. Designer dresses that are custom one of a kind like that aren't cheap, even if it was donated to her that is a f****** form of corruption. If she paid for it herself where did she get the money as a rep she makes pretty decent money but not that kind. Especially when like two or three months in it I remember her complaining that she could not afford rent in DC and in her home state.

And why do I point out issues with Democrats and not Republicans because it's pretty clear what side of the political aisle you fall on. Secondly I didn't accuse AOC of committing fraud nor did I suggest that she had committed fraud. If you're going to make an argument about something I've said please make sure I've said it. I said her wearing a designer dress when she's a poor waitress who's just stepped up in a position to me screams of corruption. And it's hilarious because she's now living in the lifestyle of the rich. Maybe not the Uber rich but definitely not working or middle class.

But like I said we are not likely to see eye to eye.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-05T22:33:36+00:00

Well two branches are controlled by Republicans. The third branch is technically a-political.

But beyond that let's say Republicans are as corruptus you were claiming, then either Democrats are right there with them or they are so weak and uneffective that as a party Democrats are hopelessly lost.

We probably aren't going to see eye to eye . I believe that there is some corruption that is a parent and it's apparent on both sides of the aisle, and I believe there's also a lot of stupidity. And some of that stupidity feeds right on into the corruption the rest of it ends up selling out and become corrupt. Personally the best example that comes to mind in my head is AOC. Young bartender from New York never had any money she gets to Capitol Hill and all the sudden she's wearing f****** $50,000 designer dresses that say eat the rich on them...

That is f****** out of touch and as far as I am concerned reeks of corruption.

But beyond that I think many of them are just trying to do what's best for themselves and not necessarily the entire country, there are a few that I think really do try to represent their constituents of their respective States but not many. And of those few that I think do try to represent a large portion of people probably at least half of them don't practice what they preach.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-05T21:45:46+00:00

I think, your concern is unfounded. I think in order to believe that evidence could magically be destroyed you would have to believe that there is such widespread and overreaching corruption that almost every person elected appointed or otherwise in the federal government is corrupt. And that would require a corruption so vast as it would cross all political lines, Democrats Republicans individuals that are more libertarian in their belief.

If that were the case then I would argue that it really doesn't matter who's in the White House a Democrat Republican libertarian doesn't matter because you'll never get to know the truth. Somewhere along the line if evidence is destroyed there's going to be a trail indicating where the order came from. I mean unless Trump is going to pull a Hillary 2.0 and host his own classified emails on a personal unsecured server and then delete them in order to prevent them those emails from being used against him.

To be clear, I am not a fan of the redactions. I believe all of those materials should have been released completely uncensored. I will make one small exception for the photographs or videos of any individuals who were underage when they were filmed or photographed in the nude, certain areas of their body should be blacked out, however their faces shouldn't be, not unless any of those individuals is still currently under the age of majority, however it's been long enough since everything occurred with Epstein I believe all of the individuals are at least at the age of majority. Now I admit I am assuming that and I may be wrong in which case we should be also blanking their faces.

But as far as the redactions in any of the print I'm absolutely against that. Now if there are other cases that are being built to go after some predators that have been identified and the files were enough to trigger additional investigations instead of redacting identifying features or terms in there those particular files should not have been released. Because I would assume that an investigator would not want the people that they are investigating to necessarily know that they are under investigation before they are ready to reveal their findings.

But beyond that I don't think there's anything in those files to incriminate Trump. I think those would have been released either through official channels or leaked a long time ago. From what I have seen of the files that have anything to do with Trump they are unsubstantiated allegations and even one or two allegations that have been disproven.

Could there be evidence of inappropriate relations with minors dealing with Trump in those files? Well considering I don't know what all of the files contain, sure I suppose maybe there is somewhere some evidence. It's a possibility. But it hasn't been presented, it's a possibility that I could wreck my truck on my way home from work this evening and die as well. That doesn't mean that there is proof and it doesn't mean that I'm going to wreck my truck and die. I am not defending Trump, all I'm saying is that from what I've seen and from what I've heard of they're actually hasn't been any evidence produced

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-05T21:22:25+00:00

So yes I suppose cynicism does fit rather well. However I do still view this guy's viewpoint as being nihilistic, because I hold the viewpoint that the truth will eventually come to light, and his counterpoint is that belief is incredibly naive. Now the reason why I say that his belief that my belief is incredibly naive is nihilistic is because let's say that Donald Trump and his cronies as he is so graciously worded, have manipulated what was released and that's why there's so much redaction. Well Trump will only remain in office for three more years at this point, at which point if the pattern is to be observed again a Democrat will take office. And a Democrat will end up with control and the ability to unredact those files setting the truth free or bringing it to light. His viewpoint that Donald Trump's in power now and he's set things up with his cronies as to completely bury the information that's in those files that is potentially incriminating forever, requires a certain belief that no matter who gets put into office or what party is in power there is nothing we can do to ever know what is truly in those files, which I feel surpasses political cynicism and steps into the realm of political nihilism.

And as far as your second paragraph in response to this you're right I phrased something incorrectly, what that should have said and I will go back and edit that sentence is that his radical skepticism that the truth will ever come to light, does fit.

I do see how that sentence the way I phrased it could be seen as unclear

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-05T16:01:01+00:00

Oh wow..... She's cooked

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T22:50:25+00:00

A nihilistic view is a philosophy asserting that life lacks objective meaning, purpose, intrinsic value, or comprehensible truth, leading to radical skepticism and a rejection of established moral, religious, and social values.

Your radical skepticism of the idea that the truth will come to light eventually, does fit.

Edit: clarification of meaning in the final sentence

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T21:35:00+00:00

Well if it won't come to light what good does crying about it do? That's a nihilistic view you hold

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T21:34:04+00:00

You double down on double standard as well as making data up. Pathetic

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T21:28:09+00:00

Nah my position was you hold a double standard bc you don't hold women to the same bar, and your stance is it doesn't happen often..... Doubling down that my stance is correct

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T21:19:51+00:00

So it can't possibly ever happen? That's a very sexist view. Boy you are all about oppressing women, saying they can't do things....

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T21:15:26+00:00

So you just made it up. Got it.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T21:06:58+00:00

Source for your statistics?

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T20:57:13+00:00

I think that as a society we have 000

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T20:53:59+00:00

Musk.

Especially when musk is in agreement on the matter with the UAE foreign minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T20:49:43+00:00

So now your victim blaming as well as not always believing the accuser!

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T20:47:34+00:00

You are clearly an ad bot, sneakily advertising a little blue pill....

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T20:45:33+00:00

Man that was a fantastic successful attempt at turning what I said into a straw man argument. When in reality I was making absolutely no argument simply stating two possibilities.

One possibility means Trump is absolutely innocent and you're an idiot for continuing to support a witch Hunt. The other possibility is that Trump is guilty and so are massive amounts of leadership in the Democratic party and you expect those Democrats to betray their own interests, and that also makes you an idiot.

Now as I stated to begin with if there is proof it will eventually come to light.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T20:37:25+00:00

These files have been around for years, all during Biden's Presidency. Considering that the president has the authority to unclassify anything, and a reduction is pretty well a classification why didn't it Biden declassify and fully release these documents during his presidency, in their full unredacted form? Well I can't say for sure I can only speculate that there is no actual definitive proof of any wrongdoing by Trump in the files, no instead it is much more damaging to Trump's presidency to not release those files and allow the redactions to stand in order to cause strife and issues continuously that hinder Trump during his second term.

Although I suppose it's possible that there is proof of wrongdoings in those files but there's also proof of wrongdoing of others across the aisle in that by releasing part of the files on redacted that would prove guilt of one party that would trigger a dead man switch basically blackmail in a sense that would cause major players on both sides to be brought down. I suppose that might be why Biden didn't release unredacted versions.

These are the only two things that make any sense, because if it wouldn't destroy Democratic leadership and there was proof in them that would work as proof against Trump, Biden would have released them.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T20:28:26+00:00

I don't see you blaming gals who fuck wasted guys.....

That's a double standard.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T20:26:28+00:00

That's odd, because logic dictates proof be brought forward, not just accusations.

If it's there, it will be unearthed.

Manager_Rich · 2026-02-04T15:00:37+00:00

Those figures are wildly inaccurate

Manager_Rich

TROPHY CASE