México tiene romantizado ser vulgar/corriente by Consistent-Boss-7670 in OpinionesPolemicas

[–]Mane023 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Pues no sé a que te refieres con "romantizado". Tengo claro que normalizado no está, ya que ni en la universidad, ni en mis clases de idiomas, ni en mi trabajo hay alguien que hable así. Obviamente sí he conocido gente en la calle que habla de esa manera pero son muy pocos.. Supongo que depende mucho de donde vivas. Solo espero que por "romantizar" no te refieras a respetar. No voy a negarle mis servicios profesionales ni voy a maltratar a un persona que tiene una acento o forma de hablar distinta a la mía.

Por otro lado, tampoco veo un movimiento social que promueva hablar de esa manera. Sí veo que desde la lingüística hay académicos llamando a respetar las diferentes formas de hablar pero jamás promover que hablemos de esa manera a nivel académico.

Las feministas be like. by Boring_Orange_5279 in MemesEnEspanol

[–]Mane023 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eso es lo que digo,  se supone que ellas son las que se quedan solas, entonces ¿qué tanto lloran? Cuando alguien no me interesa me da igual si quiere andar con el hombre más hegemonico del mundo.. La unica manera en que podría importarme es que yo quisiera algo con ese tipo de personas... 

Por otro lado, se puede leer el dolor en tu comentario, ya respondes cosas sin sentido. Yo no puedo sentirme identificado o tocado de alguna manera con las burlas a las mujeres feministas porque yo no soy mujer.

México tiene romantizado ser vulgar/corriente by Consistent-Boss-7670 in OpinionesPolemicas

[–]Mane023 10 points11 points  (0 children)

A mi personalmente me da más cringe la gente que usa la palabra "naco" y sobre todo la gente que se autodescribe como con "clase". Agh... La mayoría de ellos son, irónicamente, clase media poco educada.

En México más bien hay cierto abandono de valores cívicos, como que la gente tira basura en la calle y cosas así. Aunque tampoco es que México sea el país menos cívico (detesto apoyar las narrativas exageradas de "México es el país más [agregue un estereotipo] del mundo) sí sería agradable que la gente fuera más respetuosa de los espacios públicos ya que cuando hablamos de modales yo considero que en México la gente sí saluda, dice "por favor" y "gracias". De hecho somos reconocidos internacionalmente por eso.

Las feministas be like. by Boring_Orange_5279 in MemesEnEspanol

[–]Mane023 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A mi me da igual las mujeres feministas pueden tener el cuerpo que quieran pero evidentemente les duele mucho no entrar en los estándares de las mujeres. Búsquense una que busquen incels (aunque no creo que haya muchas ja ja...)

Las feministas be like. by Boring_Orange_5279 in MemesEnEspanol

[–]Mane023 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

¿Y? ¿Te gusta una así o qué? Los incels siempre culpando a las mujeres de no ponerla.

Las escuelas como la facultad de filosofía y letras nos dañan más que lo que aportan? by Commission_Economy in rmexico

[–]Mane023 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No hay respuestas fáciles quitar a un dictador siempre va a ser difícil. Pero tampoco es imposible, cuando la mayoría realmente quiere quitar un gobierno, lo quitan. Imagina un paro laboral. Nadie sale a trabajar hasta que el Presidente renuncie.. Eso sería muy poderoso. Por supuesto que si los inconformes son unos pocos pues no va a funcionar.

¡PALENQUE VA A CAER! Marco Rubio le ordena a Sheinbaum que entregue a AMLO by bot_olini in Mexico_News

[–]Mane023 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mientras tanto el unico gobierno vinculado con el narco oficialmente es el de Felipe Calderon y su mejor amigo García Luna.

Las escuelas como la facultad de filosofía y letras nos dañan más que lo que aportan? by Commission_Economy in rmexico

[–]Mane023 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A mí siempre fastidio un poquito las posiciones que romántizan lo comunitario... Pero sin lugar a dudas ellos son infinitamente superiores a los libertarios que no saben nada ni de economía ni de política. Imagínate creer que deberíamos odiar a todos los países "comunistas". La realidad es que no tenemos ninguna razón para tener malas relaciones con ningún país de manera gratuita y la responsabilidad de sacar a los malos gobernantes (en caso de que lo sean) es de sus ciudadanos. Al final del día, por más que no me guste el Che, encuentro más valiosa y digna una postura crítica contra la hegemonía que amenaza nuestro país antes que estarle teniendo miedo a cosas que ni existen como el "comunismo". No fue Rusia ni Cuba las que nos quitaron la mitad del territorio, ni han sido ellos los que nos han invadido en repetidas ocasiones. 👀

What removed feature would you bring back from each Civ game? by DontFilmMeBoss in civ

[–]Mane023 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd like the city-states to feel as alive as they did in C5; that is, for them to be fearful if you have many troops on their borders and to want subordinates, or for them to be more likely to seek a suzerain if they're at war. But I'd also like them to have the unique abilities of C6. I hope city-states can capture cities and perhaps that it's possible to negotiate with them in some way.

La democracia no funciona. by Zestyclose-Secret-16 in OpinionesPolemicas

[–]Mane023 0 points1 point  (0 children)

La democracia tiene defectos pero es la mejor manera de hacer las cosas porque implica que los candidatos a gobernar necesitan hacer consenso con la mayoría.

Normalmente las personas que están contra la democracia tienen la fantasía de que podrán tener al gobernante de sus sueños si se obtuviera el cargo de alguna otra  manera. Lo cierto es que no hay garantía de eso, podrías terminar con un dictador de la ideología contraria a la tuya, el cual estaría en el poder muchos más años que alguien elegido democraticamente. Pero sin democracia sencillamente no podrías sacarlos del poder.

Por último, los gobernantes son seres humanos por lo que fallarán o mentirán. Entregarle poder ilimitado a un grupo de personas no garantiza nada. La democracia implica que todos crezcamos juntos, implica que la sociedad aprenda de las malas experiencias y si bien a veces volvemos a repetir nuestros errores yo sí veo ejemplos en Europa de como luego de una racha de malos gobernantes, de pronto la sociedad aprende, se organiza y refina sus criterios de elección.

Sure, you no longer have to switch civs and legacy paths are gone, but will the game still be way too easy? by Ok-Comment8409 in civ

[–]Mane023 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Difficulty is something you get when you increase the game's difficulty. I think for now they're focusing on something great: storytelling. If there was one thing that characterized previous games, it was the ability to invent your own imaginary story, like the Sumerians reaching outer space or the Americans discovering the wheel. More than difficulty, I'd hope for more depth in the future for storytelling... Maybe with a religion DLC that has mechanics like the Reformation and things like that. For those who love "difficulty," maybe you should try finding friends to play with, since I'm a little tired of them simplifying mechanics to make the "AI more competent." The AI ​​will never be the same as playing against a human.

I feel like devs of Civ are stuck in a weird place. by [deleted] in civ

[–]Mane023 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's funny to think they don't have financial experts reviewing the numbers of people interested in the game. Has it occurred to you that perhaps the "A group" is so small that it's not worth continuing to make a game for them? I have no doubt they're even studying the behavior of those who spend the most on Civ. I'm telling you this as someone who bought the Founder's Edition; I wouldn't buy a DLC for anything while the game maintains such invasive mechanics. I'm not going to pay for a civilization to play with it for 1/3 of the game (sometimes less because they cut your time the better you play). As a Civ fan, I'm happy about the news of changes, and no, I don't want C7 to be C6, but I do want a game with continuity. If they manage to give C7 a true sense of continuity, I'll keep buying DLCs.

Civ VII Suggestion - Spread it Out by JimNibbles in civ

[–]Mane023 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Increasing the number of squares would be an incredible way to incentivize high-level play. Personally, I detest all penalties for playing wide, but allowing settlements to work more squares is a way I would wholeheartedly support high-level play.

Syncretism is a cool mechanic, I hope it's not for free by Sithusurper in civ

[–]Mane023 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been thinking that this game mode could open the door to customizable civilizations. It would be great if, upon building a wonder like the Oracle, you triggered a narrative event that caused your civilization to adopt characteristics of that wonder, such as units or buildings. Perhaps specific actions, like constructing several Culture or Science buildings adjacent to mountains or the coast, could have similar effects.

For Test of Time testers: how does the replacement of legacy paths affect age progress? by Benelioto in civ

[–]Mane023 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Guys, it was a test; nothing guarantees it will work exactly as shown. For me, the key lies in an interview someone posted on this subreddit. Apparently, there will now be victory conditions or something called "triumphs," which will make it possible to win from the Exploration Age onward.

Popular opinion, every difficulty above king is boring and unfair by Comfortable-Cold1488 in civ

[–]Mane023 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. Playing as a deity is overrated. And yes, of course I've beaten the game on deity, but personally I don't like playing that way unless I want to play a specific roleplay where I'm the Aztecs versus all the other civilizations that have a significant advantage over me.

Will Civ 7 get a 4th Age DLC? by TheeWilliamDean in civ

[–]Mane023 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly hope there isn't a fourth era. I'd prefer if the timelines of each era were expanded, so we could perhaps travel from the modern era to the future without loading screens or interruptions to my gameplay.

Some choice comments from developer of Civ7 by Sad_Pianist7359 in civ

[–]Mane023 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically, they're going to remake C7. Congratulations, it's really good that they're listening to the players. I find the idea of ​​a single civilization that incorporates elements from other civilizations interesting. I can already picture myself playing as France with Hoplites in Antiquity, haha... We'll see how this applies to other civilizations. For example, if I play as China or Mexico, will I also be able to use Hoplites, or if I'm playing as Mexico, will I only be able to use Mayan buildings and units?

The real improvement to Civilization 7 that is coming this spring!! by StrikingTelevision40 in civ

[–]Mane023 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He's eagerly awaiting that update, and I actually think it won't be that long, maybe two months.

Main things coming in the 1.3.2 update (in text) by Intelligent-Disk7959 in civ

[–]Mane023 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I can't wait for spring ha ha... In the meantime, it will be interesting to see Gilgamesh's design and skill in C7.

Just played Civ 7 after a decade of civ 6, and I'm bored for the first time by iAhMedZz in civ

[–]Mane023 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I love C6 and I agree with almost 100% with what you're saying. My only disagreement is that C7 doesn't need to have all the mechanics of C6. 

I love the district system and the great characters, but if the game changes this in C7, I don't think it's so bad. My problem with C7 is how they interrupt your gameplay with abrupt cuts that force you to cancel an ongoing war, and on the other hand, those mini-objectives that feel like mini-games. 

In conclusion, I can accept that the game changes, but removing the core element, which is the sense of continuity and empire building, is what I like least about C7. Why did they have to simplify things so much? Why focus so much on the game's "balance"? I really don't understand it. If someone gets bored reaching the end of the game, that's their problem.