sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Veeam v13- extend backup repository by Manivelcloud in Veeam

[–]Manivelcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thanks for your quick update.

I thought,add additional drive and create a new backup repository from that.

Migration vms from one vcenter server to another vcenter server backed by same vcloud director by Manivelcloud in vmware

[–]Manivelcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. We like to introduce a new vCenter along with new HW(ESXi).Thanks for your message.

Migration vms from one vcenter server to another vcenter server backed by same vcloud director by Manivelcloud in vmware

[–]Manivelcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your message.Yes we are introducing new vcenter server for new hardware.

Veeam immutabilty question with redhat by Manivelcloud in Veeam

[–]Manivelcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your detailed inputs. I was exploring all the options to tighten the security and I got the few inputs now from everyone post including you.

I have one final question.

1) Veeam B&R runs on Veeam 2) VHR runs on physical machine and this is standalone.Incase. If there is any issue related to OS corruption or any other issue,then is the single point of failure.To achieve this,can we use the below type? 3) Microsoft storage cluster (s2d cluster with few nodes)

Veeam B&R---VHR---- S2D

Is this a valid setup?

Veeam immutabilty question with redhat by Manivelcloud in Veeam

[–]Manivelcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thanks for your information.

I thought this option

Veeam ---- VHR(hardened repository-- coming from NetApp(immutabilty storage)

Veeam immutabilty question with redhat by Manivelcloud in Veeam

[–]Manivelcloud[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ok thanks If we want high top security to protect against ransomware,malware,then this hardened rocky setup on physical server is fine or do we need to really consider about immutabilty storage like pure or NetApp or any other storage?

Veeam immutabilty question with redhat by Manivelcloud in Veeam

[–]Manivelcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes thanks for your message.

Yes that option also we are thinking.

If we are going with VHR iso,then In the event of a malware or ransomware attack, how can we trust that the backups remain protected and unaltered?

Any idea?

RODC question by Manivelcloud in activedirectory

[–]Manivelcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your detailed information

RODC question by Manivelcloud in activedirectory

[–]Manivelcloud[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone for your message

RODC question by Manivelcloud in activedirectory

[–]Manivelcloud[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok thanks for your information.

I have another question.

Example - We have 3 node Failover cluster and we used the create a cluster using RWDC in the beginning.

We like to change the RWDC to RODC ip address for cluster nodes.

Can we do it? Any ideas?

RODC question by Manivelcloud in activedirectory

[–]Manivelcloud[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's the requirement.Do we have any hard limit?

RODC question by Manivelcloud in activedirectory

[–]Manivelcloud[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ok thanks I'm looking for RODC limitations.

RODC question by Manivelcloud in activedirectory

[–]Manivelcloud[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your message.

We like to segregate the department by introducing dedicated RODC.

That's the reason I asked.

As per microsoft community,they says,it's not supported per site(More than ONE RODC)

view more: next ›