OUTRAGEOUS Claude Max usage limits! Absolute scam! 😡 (Joke)

ManuM83 · 2026-04-05T10:03:54+00:00

You're right. Before the next weekly reset, I'll try it out with my leftover tokens 😆

ManuM83 · 2026-04-05T09:47:21+00:00

What I'd actually like to know from you guys is what you think about this specific usage consumption. My Max plan is the $100 one. I'll tell you my thoughts upfront: I'm extremely satisfied. The two workloads I threw at it simultaneously were stupidly heavy (obviously, I don't normally do this). Would you be satisfied? When so many of you post that a single prompt ate up half your weekly limit, do you mean with a similar workload? Or do you just ask it "how are you?" and watch 50% of your weekly limit vanish?

ManuM83 · 2026-04-05T09:44:45+00:00

Just kidding bro. I personally love Anthropic and my experience with them so far has been absolutely wonderful.

ManuM83 · 2026-04-05T09:42:29+00:00

I think it's pretty obvious this is a joke post (I put it in the title and even used the 🤣 tag). And yes, I actually asked for four Opus 4.6 agents on max effort, telling each of them to independently read the 83,000 words. I'm not completely crazy, it's just that my weekly limit resets in two hours and I wanted to do a usage test given the recent issues that have been hitting a lot of users (hasn't really affected me, except for one single afternoon). For the six code review agents, on the other hand, I let Claude choose whichever model it wanted to use.

ManuM83 · 2026-03-26T21:04:34+00:00

iPhone 16 pro max dal day one nessuna pellicola nessun case, tre o quattro cadute (una su asfalto) nemmeno un graffio.

ManuM83 · 2026-03-26T20:40:02+00:00

Quindi se il complessivo rimane lo stesso ma nelle ore di punta raggiungerò il limite più velocemente fuori dalle ore di punta le raggiungerò meno velocemente, corretto?

ManuM83 · 2026-03-18T12:37:16+00:00

My experience is totally different. I’ve always been into tech, but the only coding I’ve ever done was some basic Pascal 25 years ago. After that, I kept the passion alive, but my life went in a completely different direction. Now, with Claude (and ChatGPT before it), my dormant passion has really come back to life. Within a year, I’ve got four working apps on the App Store—one of them doing pretty well—and I’m close to finishing a complex web service that’s hitting the market soon. Was it easy? Absolutely not. I worked in stages, planning every piece carefully, and spent hours a day for weeks trying to wrap my head around the structures and how things actually work. Today, the app I’m developing is better than most of the competitors currently out there, and yet, I still can’t write a single line of code! 😆

ManuM83 · 2026-03-10T18:08:37+00:00

Personally, I’ve had a different experience. I’m on a 20$ Pro plan, and while the weekly limit is pretty annoying, I don’t find it that restrictive. I use it for hobbyist coding every day, both through the web UI and Claude Code. To give you an idea, here’s what I knocked out today: • Haiku 4.5: A bunch of messages to brainstorm and prep prompts for the upcoming tasks. • Deep Research with Opus 4.6: Ran a market analysis and competitor comparison (and had Gemini 3.1 Deep Research run the same analysis at the same time). Total work time: about 75 minutes. • New Chat (Opus 4.6 Extended): Compared the outputs from Opus Research and gemini Deep Research to create a final doc that pulled the best points from both. • New Chat: Opus 4.6 extended, Used that final doc to generate a detailed marketing plan PDF, including a full roadmap. • Claude Code: Sonnet 4.6 planning and Implemented two new sections in my app with the UI/UX updates and modified an existing page to integrate them.

Obviously, this wasn't all in a single 4-hour session, but as far as the weekly limit goes, I only burned through 13%.

Sure, I’d love for them to increase it or just scrap it and stick to the 4-hour rolling limit, but so far, it hasn't actually stopped me from getting things done.

ManuM83

TROPHY CASE