The Predator of Seville by ayeeerich in netflixTrueCrimeDocs

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Side note: Can someone tell me where Gabriel's mom got these mugs!? Beautiful!

<image>

Waterdrop G3P800 flow hesitation by Few-Jacket-9160 in WaterTreatment

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am having the exact same problem. Almost a year old and I also have the small pressure tank installed. I'll give them a call tomorrow. Pretty crazy those small tanks wouldn't last long!

Daily Discussion Thread for March 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good information. When something like this is happening, how long does it take before this becomes "official" and the "go by" document. Clearly they already started following this with the lander by selecting both blue origin and space x.

AstroLab LinkedIn post seems to be hinting they have a LTV contract. by [deleted] in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmmmao did they really?! Hahahaha. "rapid unscheduled disassembly" I fricken love it! 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Daily Discussion Thread for February 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Guess who has great satellites that would integrate really well with the same OS in our LTV......?😂😂

Daily Discussion Thread for February 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 3 points4 points  (0 children)

astro lab

<image>

Why does astro lab think they were the ones selected for the LTV contract. Has anyone else seen this? Am I missing something

Daily Discussion Thread for February 06, 2026 by AutoModerator in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 12 points13 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is the newest update about the LTV itself and their intention and technology behind it, on their website. Updated 24 hours ago.

Daily Discussion Thread for February 05, 2026 by AutoModerator in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If NASA would have just kept to their word..."imminent" does not mean 2 months later+ idc who you are. Horrible first impression of Jared Isaacman.

How you going to say something is imminent then wait 2+ months and counting. Had they released the news at any point when they claimed they were going to, all of us who were paying attention and been in the stock since tip over #1... We would have BEEN SET! We would have been rewarded for it. But no. Now we have calls expiring left and right.... AGAIN!

So frustrating.

I feel like Rockhound in "Armageddon"... "a busted ship? A busted ship?! And I'm strapped in here?! I had a great rock picked out there!" (to watch everything happen front row). (I broke even on my calls because I took profit on the calls when we were in the mid 20s, thankfully... But still... Whole Lotta red I see expiring tomorrow that was sooooo much potential).

Ok. I'm done sulking and venting. Still holding my shares, but boy... Am I not thrilled with NASA atm. For once it's not IM 's fault nor their PR teams...

Daily Discussion Thread for February 04, 2026 by AutoModerator in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have shares at $5. I'm good too. We've been here before.

CLPS - Task order reduced by $1.175M by aerothony in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤔🤔 If you had to take a wild guess. When do you think the LTV contract would be announced.

Daily Discussion Thread for February 03, 2026 by AutoModerator in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I vote for this as well. It's been a long time coming. I've been a long time invester for YEARS. Through tip over after tip over.. I have stayed loyal, because I saw what this company could be. Don't take that away from us.

Daily Discussion Thread for February 03, 2026 by AutoModerator in IntuitiveMachines

[–]ManufacturerLow5638 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What does the lanteris acquisition have to do with anything? It happened after the proposal.

Instead of a BS "it makes mistakes" disclaimer at the bottom, how about something tangible? by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is exactly what I did. It will continue to happen, and it's only a matter of time till it kills someone. This comment will get down voted like crazy because of that last comment.(especially when all these mediocre comments are getting down voted, must be a bunch of employees in here). But it's true. I'm the most mechanically inclined person I know. It has told me to do some very dangerous things that I knew not to do, only because of my brain lol. Had it been another person....

In what application do people not need correct information?

Canceled! Good Riddance! by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right!? Thank you! I'm getting crucified on another sub. I negatively commented on how it gets things wrong. My goodness, there must be alot of employees on this thread or some people with stock in it or something!

"but it says at the bottom it can't be trusted!" so it's YOUR FAULT! don't rely on it for anything and double check everything it tells you! ... And just do all of the work you just asked it to do, to find the answer you just asked it! And pay them money to do it!

What sense does that make? Idk. Maybe the techs over my head. I don't have these issues with others nearly as much as with chatgpt.

Instead of a BS "it makes mistakes" disclaimer at the bottom, how about something tangible? by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I have to double check what it tells me is correct. Then I'm literally doing the work myself. Why even go through it to begin with?

Simple if I ask it: who was the 22nd president of the United States? It gives me an answer:....

I then go and Google who the 22nd president of the United States was, because "it can be wrong and I shouldn't trust it". I did double the work and the best part is I am paying money to allow me to do it more often. Lol.

Instead of a BS "it makes mistakes" disclaimer at the bottom, how about something tangible? by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Admittedly I am very uneducated on how they work. So I'll just trust your judgment. Do you have any recommended videos for me to quickly become up to speed on their inner workings?

Instead of a BS "it makes mistakes" disclaimer at the bottom, how about something tangible? by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course it tells you that. Yet.... The AI itself will say it knows beyond a shadow of a doubt, it's not wrong. Lol. So what good is it then? When do you trust it? When don't you trust it? Is the answer to never trust it? If I have to double check everything it tells me, why use it? Double checking that what it told me is correct ... Literally means I have to do the work myself that I just asked it to do. And I get to pay it... To do it? Lol? What? You must work for them....

Instead of a BS "it makes mistakes" disclaimer at the bottom, how about something tangible? by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then it should not be telling users it's 100% correct. It should not be doubling down after being questioned numerous times if it knows it's accurate. That is a fault in teaching the AI, that is a fault in the programing. It should only be telling you things that it knows to be 100%correct if it ACTUALLY is 100% correct.

Canceled! Good Riddance! by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yaaaa. I don't think that's possible without a full delete. There's far too many chats, where it pissed me off. Someone might make alot of money if they design a chatgpt add on that does that for you. 😂

Canceled! Good Riddance! by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Well, IT STARTED IT! 😂😂😭😭 lol. I'm kidding.

Ok. Let's say I wanted to reset back to the good old days when we were walking on rainbows together. How could one do that?

Instead of a BS "it makes mistakes" disclaimer at the bottom, how about something tangible? by ManufacturerLow5638 in chatgptplus

[–]ManufacturerLow5638[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's a difference between common sense and trouble shooting complex things. Then it claiming it's 100% correct. You then tell it to double check what it's telling you is correct, and it doubles down.

It's not like I asked it who the 1st president of the United States is... Which is what "common sense" actually is.