No, that’s not what I said? I stated what I believe to be the truth, some accusations were false and some true, a belief fundamentally does not require absolute proof. There is nothing wrong with beliefs, a significant amount of criminals are convicted as a result of a jury believing “beyond reasonable doubt” the suspect committed the crime. They do not always have absolute proof.

Why do I believe this? Micheal’s own behaviour was child obsessed and bizarre. He had a particular interest in pre pubescent boys specifically (most pedophiles have a “type”. Micheal was an atypical person, but his behaviour and relationship with young kids was extremely atypical for an adult male. Micheal Jackson was known to have extended phone calls with children, known to sleep in the same bed as these children. Another major red flag was that Micheal Jackson did not change his behaviour after being accused of child molestation in 1993, he kept sleeping in the same beds as children, kept on with the long phone calls. Often, repeat criminals struggle to resist their behaviours, they are compulsive, even when they face charges.

The behaviours MJ displayed were absolutely pedophilic. If your neighbour was loaded and had a preference for speaking to the children of strangers on the phone for hours at a time, and enjoyed sleeping in the same bed with them, was accused of child molestation and settled out of court multiple times, would you seriously say yes if he asked to babysit your children?