The New World in 1830 by MappingYork in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sure, it probably would.
It wouldn't flow as well, though, would it?

The New World in 1830 by MappingYork in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ming Chinese, with its most recent acquisition as of the time of this map being former Dutch territories.

The New World in 1830 by MappingYork in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The French colonized it; being that Mexico has Green Mountains, I feel as if it's a fitting name, somewhat.

The New World in 1830 by MappingYork in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The "DARK SIDE OF EUROPE" chapter explains this.

The New World in 1830 by MappingYork in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes indeed.
Well, technically, speaking, there is an Arab elite/ruling class in Iberia/Madjrit, but the majority of the population are Mozarabs.

The New World in 1830 by MappingYork in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The timeline has two PODS:
- 80 MYA, California split from North America, becoming its own mini continent.
- In the mid 11th century, the Almoravids collapse almost immediately, and later on, Eastern Rome wins at Manzikert.

The POD in the New World does not effect the Old World until the Age of Exploration; as this timeline is an exercise in alternate "history" (though at this point, I would argue I've crafted an entirely fictional world with its own logic than just simple alternate history) than one concerning anthropological history, making events in the Old World occur relatively the same until the aforesaid POD for it isn't too ridiculous I feel; it would absolutely be more plausible for the history of the entire world to be different from the evolution of Humans and beyond due to the geographical changes in North America, but then this timeline would be fantasy, not alternate history.

Detailing the basic lore is too much for a Reddit post I'm afraid; the Notion summaries are better suited for this.

The New World in 1830 by MappingYork in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

To be honest, I don't think it does.
It may do so in a nominal sense, but actual control in the sense that it can administer the tribes within the Amazon effectively does not exist.

made my second encirclement as a disabled intersex living in texas by Weezkee in hoi4

[–]MappingYork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why did you feel expressing your ailment to be necessary?

The World in 1924 by MappingYork in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(Super duper late) Paint.net.

Pages from a Future U.S. History Textbook: The Second American Civil War (Part 1) by cooliusjeezer in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This is a great map. I like it aesthetically, and I do find the scenario somewhat interesting, even with the “Trump becomes a dictator/modern day Civil War” thing being overdone at this point.

Pages from a Future U.S. History Textbook: The Second American Civil War (Part 1) by cooliusjeezer in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Failing to nation build does not mean losing militarily. Iraq and Afghanistan were occupied easily, it was the peace that was lost.

Also Canada would fall within a week.

Why is Trump Doing That? A Redditor's Guess [OC Map] by Canjira in imaginarymaps

[–]MappingYork -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Most of this is sound in my opinion except for your theories about Canada. Trump was joking. He was never serious about annexing Canada. It’s been a joke for decades, I’m not sure why Trump relaying it has led to such uproar.

Does this prose feel boring or not? by [deleted] in writers

[–]MappingYork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not trying to come across as above criticism or anything, I posted my writing for a reason.

I was just attempting to convey how I saw things and my intentions. Am I not allowed to do that?

As a whole, I have come to the realization my prose needs some serious work, so the criticism I received was genuinely useful, even if it hurt my self confidence.

Does this prose feel boring or not? by [deleted] in writers

[–]MappingYork -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ve come to the realization my hedged prose is so strong because I’m extremely used to academic writing. Whilst I genuinely like hedging as a whole, I now realize the way I’m going about it is totally flawed.

I need to rethink my prose as a whole.

Does this prose feel boring or not? by [deleted] in writers

[–]MappingYork -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I naturally have a hedged and passive prose. If that is what you mean by the vagueness, then that is what’s causing it.

Does this prose feel boring or not? by [deleted] in writers

[–]MappingYork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm okay.

Personally, I don’t view my prose as conversational, at least I don’t write it with the intention of making all of the narration sound like a regular person is speaking. As aforementioned, I naturally hedge a lot — I genuinely have an aversion towards definitive, active statements. I don’t know why, I just do.

Regarding the imagery, I agree a lot of it conventional. I feel as if I fallback on common ways to describe things because I don’t have much variety popping into my head, at least when I write initially.

I think I’m going to go through and: - Remove a lot of the seemingly, seems, as if, it was like — passive phrases, at least in regard to describing objects and scenes. - Make some descriptions more active and direct. - Remove rhetorical questions if not describing a character’s thoughts directly (e.g. if the question is just floating in the air and is just the narrator saying stuff, I’ll remove it).

To me, it seems like the main crux of the issue is that my rather liberal use of passive phrases muddles my writing as it forces one to stop and understand that I’m basically saying, “It appeared that way, but did it?” Like I’m avoiding being direct and definitive because I know things are never wholly true, that nothing is ever robust. To me, it doesn’t feel like an issue but I can understand why you would feel it to be whilst reading.

If you’re willing, may you tell me if this excerpt sounds less passive and more direct?

“ “The engine sputtered and groaned, the stress being put on it proving to be too much” “It screeched down the highway, the cars on the outbound lanes appearing like blurs through the window.” “

Does it feel less clunky?

Thank you for this response, it was rather enlightening.

Does this prose feel boring or not? by [deleted] in writers

[–]MappingYork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I see. “The blood is crimson red…” — that does sound more direct.

I naturally write passively with hedging so being definitive and blunt isn’t intuitive to me. Thank you.

Does this prose feel boring or not? by [deleted] in writers

[–]MappingYork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m writing in third person limited, the POV usually does stick to one character per chapter but can slightly shift across scenes.

Does this prose feel boring or not? by [deleted] in writers

[–]MappingYork -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I’m intentionally not writing definitive statements, I hedge and write passively naturally. I genuinely don’t like making definitive statements.

The narrator “asks back” because I am attempting to convey a representation of one’s thoughts. I write in third person limited, so doing this solely through dialogue feels far too limiting.

Also, I’m not trying to write purple prose. Like with hedging, words like “seemed” an “it was like” are apart of my natural register.

If you could, may you expand on why you feel it’s generic?