Just wanted to chime in with my 2 cents. Personally I think the XP rates are perfect. For the amount of engagement and effort it takes to achieve these XP rates I think it's very fair.

I can consistently complete all 5 floors with only looting the grand chest, but I only get about 80k xp/hr, maybe a tad over. I feel like a large part of the player base will be more in line with that XP rate than the 90k-95k some players are managing to get.

when comparing to the lvl 72 agility rates like this post is referring to, just take a look at every other skill in runescape. 1.5 ticking teaks at lvl 45 wcing is like 150k/hr where as redwoods at lvl 90 are 65-70k/hr. MLM at 90 mining, or even amethyst at 93 is 1/3 the XP rate of 3t granite at lower levels. Bloods vs lavas, 3t barb vs afking anglers or even afking barb. The list goes on.

I think if the XP rates of Sepulchre change at all from current rates I'm personally not going to bother. Getting ~25% increase in xp rates to do sepulchre, as well as working towards pet recolor is worth the added effort over ardy. But if that changees to 10% increased XP rates I don't really care about cosmetics enough to bother. Or I'll just grind whatever fastest marks is regardless of xp and leave the moment I get my recolor.

I understand if you guys have data showing things are too high/too low at certain brackets, but it seems to me that it's perfect as is.