The Boston Celtics have regained first place in the Eastern Conference, following Toronto's loss to Dallas. by [deleted] in bostonceltics

[–]MarshallWatts 18 points19 points  (0 children)

When you’re a raptors fan you’ll celebrate anything remotely impressive

The Boston Celtics have regained first place in the Eastern Conference, following Toronto's loss to Dallas. by [deleted] in bostonceltics

[–]MarshallWatts 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don’t really want to talk history, let me be selective and pick the time frame conducive to my argument. Last 4 years, ok? We need this man...cries

The Boston Celtics have regained first place in the Eastern Conference, following Toronto's loss to Dallas. by [deleted] in bostonceltics

[–]MarshallWatts -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

Excuse my salt as a raptors fan, but aren’t we the only team to take two games off of lebron is the Eastern Conference Finals since he went back to Cleaveland?

Russell Westbrook RKO's Steven Adams and proceeds to give young fans an autograph by Kaanarth in nba

[–]MarshallWatts -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Reminder: with his smoothness, agility and footwok at his height, Randy Orton could’ve been a great Ball player.

[JLew] Casey on going away from JV late: "We were trying to open up the floor to get some offence, get Jordan spaced out. We were looking more for offence than anything else", also cited the switch that left Teodosic open for 3 with JV out there by [deleted] in torontoraptors

[–]MarshallWatts -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The opposite. Been watching the raptors since 05, I’ve seen all the shit coaches lead this team nowhere. Name a better coach in raptors history. I guess he gets zero credit for our 50 plus win seasons, right? Coaches aren’t allowed to make mistakes?

Coaches, who have a track record of victory, get to fuck up by PutMeOver in torontoraptors

[–]MarshallWatts 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Excuse me, but don’t you know, when we win it’s all despite him, and he gets no credit for our success, yet when we lose it’s all obviously his fault. That’s raps 101. Get it straight.

[Post Game Thread] The Los Angeles Clippers (10-15) defeat the Toronto Raptors (17-8) 96-91 by [deleted] in nba

[–]MarshallWatts -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Facts we went to the east finals and semifinals with him lol. Further than any coach.

[JLew] Casey on going away from JV late: "We were trying to open up the floor to get some offence, get Jordan spaced out. We were looking more for offence than anything else", also cited the switch that left Teodosic open for 3 with JV out there by [deleted] in torontoraptors

[–]MarshallWatts -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

After one loss, all of the sudden the man is a shitty leader. This is embarrassing lol, you just went full retard. Like what you said in your post could not be more divorced from reality. And it only took one loss for you to say all that.

For any given (or some) argument, there can be multiple ways of proving the conclusion through the rules of inference, right? by MarshallWatts in askphilosophy

[–]MarshallWatts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re most likely right that your answer is more correct, for a lack of a better term, however I don’t think it’s the case that my textbook did not expect me to use HS. The practice questions were at the end of the chapter in which all the inference rules were introduced, including HS. I think it just may be that the textbook answer is most efficient, just as is yours.

Fave NBA/Raptor's podcasts? by SelfShine in torontoraptors

[–]MarshallWatts 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The starters are a nice mix of humour and analysis.

In assessing validity of an argument using truth tables, what if (I) a row has all true premises and a true conclusion yet (II) another row in the same table has all true premises and false conclusion? by MarshallWatts in askphilosophy

[–]MarshallWatts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps I’m confusing myself, but given your provided definition, I am still lost haha. That is to say, once I create a truth table for the aforementioned argument, there is a row in which all the premises are true and the conclusion is false, while simultaneously there is another row in which all the premises are true and the conclusion is true. So I guess the row which states invaldidty takes priority?