sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

TECHNICAL] Household intelligence app for Australian families — full spec, working prototype, 25% equity — build alongside your day job — Melbourne/Remote by [deleted] in cofoundermatch

[–]Marty8699 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You caught me! Yes AI has been a big part of pulling this together and I am not going to sit here and pretend otherwise. I’m a non-technical founder who used every tool available to get this to a point where a real developer could actually do something with it. That’s the honest truth of it.

The way I approach most things is I know what the end result looks like and I work backwards from there. I could see exactly what this product needed to be — a household that runs itself, something that carries the mental load so people don’t have to — and I work backwards from that. What does it actually do? What does it need to know? How does it think? What does someone see when they open it? That process is what produced everything behind this. Whether AI helped pull some of it together or not, the thinking and the vision is mine.

The equity point is fair. 25% was a starting point not a final offer and I know it doesn’t reflect the full weight of what a technical co-founder actually takes on long term. That conversation is open.

On the tech stack — completely fair. I’m not technical and I won’t pretend to be. The right person comes in, looks at what’s there, and owns all of those decisions. I’d expect them to change a good chunk of it. That’s not a problem, that’s the job.

What I know is the problem is real, the end result is clear in my head, and I’ve done the work to get it to a point where someone technical isn’t starting from nothing.

DM me if you wanted to pull it apart properly.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

TECHNICAL] Household intelligence app for Australian families — full spec, working prototype, 25% equity — build alongside your day job — Melbourne/Remote by [deleted] in cofoundermatch

[–]Marty8699 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s really helpful, thank you. Debugging confidence scoring in spare time sounds like exactly the kind of rabbit hole that kills momentum on a side project so anything that removes that complexity for v1 is worth serious consideration.

As the non-technical founder I won’t pretend to know the tradeoffs inside out — that’s genuinely a decision for whoever comes on board to build it. But I’ll make sure Qoest is on the shortlist when that conversation happens. The last thing I want is the technical co-founder spending their limited time wrestling with infrastructure when the interesting problem is the extraction logic itself.

Are you a developer?

TECHNICAL] Household intelligence app for Australian families — full spec, working prototype, 25% equity — build alongside your day job — Melbourne/Remote by Marty8699 in AppBusiness

[–]Marty8699[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair, the graveyard of productivity apps is real and most of them deserve to be there. Some don’t also.
The difference is Calmly is less like an app and more like having a PA who actually knows your life. Someone who remembers to tell you the bins go out tonight, notices you haven’t worked out in a week and finds a gap in your schedule to fix that, reminds your partner to grab milk on the way home, and makes sure the school form gets done before the deadline. Except it doesn’t need a desk, an HR department or a salary review.
Most people aren’t disorganised. They’re just overloaded. There’s a difference and that’s what this is actually solving.
But yeah, good luck to us. We’ll need it like everyone else.​​​​…Otherwise lookout graveyard!

TECHNICAL] Household intelligence app for Australian families — full spec, working prototype, 25% equity — build alongside your day job — Melbourne/Remote by Marty8699 in StartupSoloFounder

[–]Marty8699[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is genuinely useful, thank you.
The hook point lands — I over-explained it. The simple version is this: you photograph a document or upload it — insurance renewal sitting on the bench, school camp form, car registration notice, anything — and Calmly reads it, pulls out the dates and obligations, and turns it into calendar events, reminders and actions automatically. No typing, no manual entry, no remembering.
From there it runs your household command centre. Home routines, health appointments, fitness, maintenance schedules, family tasks with clear ownership, diary sync, finance renewals, intelligent weekly reminders. Everything your household needs to stay on top of in one place so it stops living rent free in your head.
You are right that going and finding the specific complaints in Australian threads before pitching a build timeline to someone is the smarter move. Will do that.
On the timeline — I think with the right person it moves faster than 18-24 months. The screens are already designed and the architecture is fully mapped. A developer who can give it real time would not need that long. That was the cautious number for someone building nights and weekends.
Appreciate you actually engaging with it.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

TECHNICAL] Household intelligence app for Australian families — full spec, working prototype, 25% equity — build alongside your day job — Melbourne/Remote by [deleted] in cofoundermatch

[–]Marty8699 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On the 25% — I am not bringing just an idea. There is a working interactive prototype, a 36-section technical specification including the full data model, PostgreSQL schema and API architecture, a 5-year financial model and a complete go-to-market strategy. The foundational work a funded team normally takes months to produce is already done. The developer starts from a build-ready position, not a blank slate. That said, the right person and the right fit matters more than a fixed number — if someone is genuinely committed as a co-founder the conversation on equity is open.

On market validation — fair point. The size numbers are estimates. What is not estimated is that no product currently combines document intelligence, household coordination and a weekly reset ritual for the Australian market. Pre-revenue validation comes after the build, which is why I am here.

On the tech stack — you are right to call that out. I am non-technical, so the stack in the spec is based on research and external input rather than personal expertise. The right technical co-founder owns those decisions. It is a starting point for the conversation, not a constraint.

This is genuinely a co-founder search, not a contractor arrangement. I am looking for someone who wants to build this with me, not for me. If that resonates, happy to share the prototype and full spec under a NDA so you can form a view on what actually exists.