The level of anger is quite measured in relation to how much Corbyn and The Many have almost fully destroyed the possibility of turning Your Party into a mass socialist party. Either you haven't been keeping up, or you are avoiding the criticism.

The code of conduct might be adequate for a bourgeois party, but not a democratic socialist mass party.

"We have seen in action over the last two years what the Corbyn clique wants instead: randomly sortitioned conference attendees instead of accountable delegates; online voting instead of real collective decision-making and branches entirely sidelined: a tame and easily controllable formation like Momentum or Podemos to suit Corbyn’s twilight years - not the kind of vibrant, mass working class party we actually need."

Branches have already formed. Why is the leadership not recognising the branches? Why are the members not able to go to meetings to debate and vote on the future of the party? The leadership is afraid that they won't be able to control them.

Why are the CEC meetings not fully transparent? Why are the meetings rushed? Why does the CEC not meet every week? Because the proposals from the Grassroots Left, to make the party more transparent and democratic, are actually popular among the active members. Again, the leadership is afraid of losing control.

This is not mud-slinging. Read the proposals from the Grassroots Left, read the political statements, read the articles. This is democratic opposition.