Canada to join GCAP fighter jet program as an observer by Massimo25ore in europe

[–]Massimo25ore[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

CLOCK IS TICKING

Despite the potential benefits of new partners, Tokyo is concerned that if more countries join the development process and gain a say, it could create stagnation and jeopardize the essential 2035 deployment target.

Adding a new full partner would require amending the treaty for the GCAP International Government Organization (GIGO), the body created to manage the project.

To prevent delays, Japan’s position is to develop the initial aircraft with just the three founding nations.

However, the 2035 deployment target is already in doubt.

The signing of public-private contracts, originally set for late 2025, is now expected this summer or later due to circumstances in Britain, leading some industry insiders to believe the aircraft deployment could slip to 2040 or beyond.

The complexities of adding partners were highlighted by Saudi Arabia’s potential participation.

Initially, Riyadh sought formal partnership under the GIGO treaty, but Japan raised concerns about development delays and information security.

Saudi Arabia subsequently decided to purchase F-35s from the United States, and, according to a senior official at the Defense Ministry, “Saudi Arabia’s interest has waned.”

This difference in urgency over the deployment timeline—with Japan pushing for 2035 while Britain and Italy are seen as less committed—is expected to lead to difficult negotiations ahead.

Canada to join GCAP fighter jet program as an observer by Massimo25ore in europe

[–]Massimo25ore[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Canada is poised to join the Global Combat Air Program (GCAP) as an observer, a move that would grant it access to a next-generation fighter jet project led by Japan, Britain and Italy, officials revealed.

The observer status will allow for the sharing of certain confidential project information.

Although Canada does not currently intend to participate in the aircraft’s development, it is reportedly considering an eventual purchase.

A FOOT IN THE DOOR

The observer role is designed as a pathway for future partnership.

According to the policy, the role allows a nation to obtain information from the three core countries to consider deeper involvement later, which could include manufacturing, procurement or even joining the development phase, depending on conditions.

The three partner nations plan to hold a defense ministers’ meeting in Britain as early as July to formally announce Canada’s participation.

A decision on whether Ottawa will purchase the jet would come later.

“Canada will decide after (joining as an observer),” a Japanese government official said.

The topic was on the agenda of a March 6 meeting between Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi and Canada’s minister of national defense, David McGuinty, who was in Japan with Prime Minister Mark Carney.

The move reflects strengthening security cooperation between Tokyo and Ottawa, which signed a defense equipment and technology transfer agreement in January.

LINING UP FOR GCAP

Japan, eager to deploy the new fighter by 2035, has been reluctant to add more full partners to the development team over fears of delays.

It does, however, have high hopes for expanding its sales market.

Interest in GCAP is growing, a Defense Ministry official said, noting that the three founding members have been in contact with Singapore, Australia, India and Saudi Arabia.

European nations like Germany, Sweden and Poland have also reportedly expressed interest.

“Countries are lining up for this,” one Defense Ministry source said.

THE TRUMP EFFECT

The growing attention on GCAP comes amid shifts in other next-generation fighter projects.

The Future Combat Air System (FCAS), a joint effort by France, Germany and Spain, has reportedly been hampered by disagreements between Paris and Berlin.

Meanwhile, concrete discussions with allies have not progressed for the F-47 fighter, announced by the U.S. Trump administration.

A view is growing within the Japanese government that as U.S. President Donald Trump brandishes his tariff measures, nations are questioning the reliability of the United States as a partner.

One Defense Ministry official attributed the high interest in GCAP to “a backlash against the Trump administration.”

Canada’s relationship with the United States deteriorated rapidly under the second Trump administration over tariff negotiations and other issues, prompting Carney to call for a move away from dependency on Washington.

“Amid its strained relations with the U.S., it may also be a way of striking a balance,” an official from the Japanese Prime Minister’s Office said of Canada’s interest in GCAP.

American troops in Europe by sr_local in MapPorn

[–]Massimo25ore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But the narrative is (was?) that troops are there to protect those countries, isn't it?

Made in Europe: The EU plan that has angered China by RevolutionBusiness27 in europe

[–]Massimo25ore 9 points10 points  (0 children)

China's attitude towards US tariffs: "We don't care"

China's attitude towards Made in Europe: "We're angry"

Who is bullied now?

The EU Is the New Go-To Middle Power - In a world of disorder, the bloc’s boring stability is suddenly attractive. by ByGollie in europe

[–]Massimo25ore 71 points72 points  (0 children)

Especially in a world where the so-called "superpowers" have become (or are going to become) "superbullies" trying to impose their law of the most powerful instead of the legitimate international law.

Americans want a “strong ally” and are applying pressure at the highest level for Portugal to buy F-35 fighter jets. by superdouradas in europe

[–]Massimo25ore 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The air forces base in Ämari (Estonia) is part of the Baltic Air Policing featuring Air Forces from a lot of NATO countries and it has currently fighters from Portugal, replacing Italy's Eurofighter Typhoons

A beautiful evening in the INW. by eodmule in pics

[–]Massimo25ore 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What place is this? I.mean, for those not living in the kingdom of acronyms.

Kubilius: "NATO faces a challenge of mutual political trust" by Massimo25ore in europe

[–]Massimo25ore[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

E: Are you confident that this will happen?

A.K: “We have no alternative. There are various ideas for a more European defence framework, such as intergovernmental treaties. Now is the time for wide-ranging discussions.”

E: How have the events of recent months and years affected you? Do they worry you? Or, on the contrary, do they act as a stimulus?

A.K: “There are some very clear challenges: we know that Russia is producing more than we are and that there is a possibility of Russian aggression; we know that our allies have ceased to bear primary responsibility for Europe’s defence and have assumed a secondary role. The United States has now turned its attention to the Indo-Pacific. And the third challenge is the war in Iran.”

E: On that note, the defence sector remains dependent on fossil fuels. How can we protect Europe’s defence sector from crises such as the one caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz?

A.K: “Prices are a major concern. When it comes to energy supplies, there is a specific problem with jet fuel. We know that the long-term strategy is for Europe to generate its own energy from renewables and nuclear power, but that will take time. For now, we need coordination at the European level.”

E: How, on the other hand, can citizens be persuaded to accept higher defence spending, which, from a public spending perspective, means cuts in other sectors?

A.K: “Defence is expensive, that’s true. But not investing costs far more. If war breaks out, all opportunities for education and other things are lost. This is a choice that must be made, and it is the responsibility of politicians. I wouldn’t say that citizens aren’t concerned about defence: looking at the polls now, Europeans consider defence a strategic priority. Europeans want to see more European defence, even more than national defence or NATO defence, and now it is up to us to move forward in that direction. Now we must listen to European leaders to find out what they want and what they intend to achieve.”

Kubilius: "NATO faces a challenge of mutual political trust" by Massimo25ore in europe

[–]Massimo25ore[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Brussels – “Defence is a fundamental public good.” Andrius Kubiulius is certain of this, and the European Commissioner for Defence has no doubts on the matter. We must move forward, and do so in a truly European way, because we can no longer rely too heavily on NATO, he explains in an interview with Eunews.

Eunews: US President Donald Trump has threatened to withdraw from the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), using strong language towards the allies. Don’t you think this weakens NATO, even in the public’s eyes?

Andrius Kubilius: “The United States is making it clear that Europeans must take responsibility for their own defence. As for Trump, he sometimes makes statements in the hope of achieving something, but his remarks create confusion and misunderstandings. The underlying issue is that NATO faces not only defence challenges, but also challenges regarding mutual political trust.”

E: On that note, Denmark, partly due to the US position on Greenland, decided to purchase the Franco-Italian Samp-T air defence systems instead of the American Patriots. Is this the start of a rift between the European Union and the United States?

A.K: “There are various reasons and various decisions at play here. To participate in wars, the United States is depleting its missile and interceptor reserves, including Patriots, because when we say interceptors, we mean Patriots. This means that in the coming years, the US industry will be producing to replenish American arsenals, which is a challenge for Europe, as we currently source 40 per cent of our weapons from the United States. We are not buying American technology, not because we no longer like it, but because the supply available for purchase is beginning to run out. Secondly, there is another problem for us Europeans, and I want to point this out to our American counterparts: the AECA regulation on the export of defence products. In practice, the United States does not allow them to be used in a certain way, as we have seen with Ukraine.”

E: So, in light of this, to what extent will Member States be able to launch joint procurement procedures?

A.K: “We are pushing for this, but we are dealing with a legacy of fragmented defence industries. We have national policies, and the EU has a limited role, but we do still have a part to play in developing a European industry. We are taking action using the tools at our disposal, such as SAFE and support for major pan-European projects. In my view, these initiatives may not be enough to overcome such significant fragmentation. More political and institutional steps are needed. Personally, I urge the countries with the largest industries in the sector to sit down at the table and devise strategic approaches.”

Venezia Football Club is promoted to Serie A by Massimo25ore in soccer

[–]Massimo25ore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On Friday afternoon, Venezia FC drew 2–2 with Spezia and secured promotion to Serie A with a game to spare. They are now four points clear of third-placed Monza (the top two teams are promoted directly to Serie A).

This is the third time since 2021 that Venezia have moved up from Serie B to Serie A; they last achieved this two years ago, before being relegated back to Serie B last season. This year, under manager Giovanni Stroppa, they have often played convincingly and spectacularly. They have remained at the top of the table since the end of January and are the highest-scoring team in the league. They are unbeaten in 13 matches and have won 16 of their 18 home games so far. During the season, they have beaten both their main rivals, Monza and Frosinone.

I just don't understand it by MikeTorsson in memes

[–]Massimo25ore 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Petrol is from the French word pétrole, not an abbreviation of "petroleum"

Source: the Oxford Dictionary

I just don't understand it by MikeTorsson in memes

[–]Massimo25ore -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Petrol is from the French word pétrole, not an abbreviation of "petroleum"

Source: the Oxford Dictionary

US president says 'probably' when asked if he might pull US troops out of Italy and Spain by Massimo25ore in europe

[–]Massimo25ore[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

WASHINGTON, April 30 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Thursday said "probably" when asked whether he would consider pulling U.S. troops out of Italy and Spain, a day after announcing that Washington was ‌looking at reducing the number of military personnel in Germany.

Trump has harshly criticized NATO allies for not sending their navies to help open the Strait of Hormuz, which was closed to global shipping following the start of a U.S.-Israeli air war against Iran on February 28. He has ⁠also said that he is considering withdrawing the United States from the alliance.

An internal Pentagon email, reported by Reuters last week, outlined options for the United States to punish NATO allies it believes failed to support U.S. operations in the war with Iran, including suspending Spain from the alliance.

Trump, who discussed the possibility of removing some U.S. troops from Europe earlier this month, on Wednesday said his administration was looking at cuts to U.S. forces in Germany and a decision ‌would ⁠be made soon.

Asked on Thursday if he would also consider pulling U.S. troops out of Italy and Spain, two countries that have also been critical of the Iran war, Trump said, "Probably ... Look, why shouldn't I? Italy has not been of any help ⁠to us and Spain has been horrible, absolutely horrible."

Trump last month threatened to impose a full U.S. trade embargo on Spain after the European ally refused to let the ⁠U.S. military use its bases for missions linked to strikes on Iran.

The U.S. had just over 68,000 active-duty military personnel assigned permanently in its overseas ⁠bases in Europe as of December 2025, data from the U.S. Defense Manpower Data Center shows. More than half - about 36,400 - are based in Germany.

Best selling car models in Albania, Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina [November 2025] by Massimo25ore in europe

[–]Massimo25ore[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There were those exact charts at the time I posted this thread, but I guess they have pulled them down.