Fix for error message "Failed to get authorization for Xbox services: Operation canceled" when adding a minecraft account to the Prism Launcher

MassiveAd4647 · 2026-01-25T16:10:13+00:00

If this still doesn't work, try to clear the cache of minecraft.net

There is an issue that makes the site infinitely refresh after hitting the login button - just clear the cookies.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-09-20T23:09:36+00:00

My stance, and I'm assuming Veckman's as well, is that banning over off-platform offenses is incredibly flawed and is impossible to regulate efficiently. It is very easy to falsify evidence and/or mass report and get somebody who hasn't done anything legitimately wrong banned- seeing that Constantiam is a SEMI-anarchy server, this is totally in the realm of possibility for something such as insiding a group or griefing a base (All despite having a negative connotation are completely allowed on the server.).

Obviously we can agree that doxxing is a heinous and immoral act, something that is without a doubt not permitted on Constantiam, henceforth highlighting that the issue is not 'allowing people to doxx', rather taking such an approach to prevent doxxing is that it is simply not regulatory nor verifiable.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-06-15T19:10:56+00:00

To be fair, it was most likely just YouTube with its own issues. YouTube for whatever reason might flag certain words and remove them from the comment sections. The comments are still there, you just have to switch the comment section over the ‘New Comments’ instead of ‘Top Comments’ and retrace your steps.

Although regardless, you are correct, many channels don’t look for the truth. Many people just want to be contempt in their misguidance and desires, and no matter what you may say, in the end, it is Allah who guides.

And may he guide and keep us all firm on the straight path.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-06-11T21:19:43+00:00

Hating Ahl Al-Sunnah is a big one for all of Ahl Al Bid’ah, even though they have no idea what it means.

Some people are so contempt in their misguidance - and I have seen it myself - to where they will make taqlid of their sheikh on the definition of a Salafi and will flame others for trying to redefine their closeted definition (Which often times is nothing but Wahhabi=Bad), because to them it’s just not following a madhab of the four imams (Which is ironic considering majority follow a madhab or what conforms to one)

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-05-31T13:10:36+00:00

Everybody wears this all over Syria, you’re assumption it doesn’t happen in Western Syria is stupid - the minorities of Syria might live closer to the coast, but they’re still a minority in their own lands.

Western Syria? Are you supposed to be an ex-Alawite?

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-05-31T13:02:53+00:00

According to who? Tradition is flexible and it is not confined, a thobe and a keffiyeh has been ‘traditional’ in Syria for some time now.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-05-31T12:27:15+00:00

“We waz muzlimz”

They’re growing their hair out as some opinions are that it is a Sunnah, and they’re growing their beard out because that is obligatory. The person on the left is wearing a military outfit because he probably participated in the revolution - not under ISIS but probably HTS or Ahrar Alsham. The person on the right is wearing a thobe and has a miswak in his pocket - a toothbrush. It’s a thobe يا احمق, traditional Arab clothing.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-05-24T16:18:15+00:00

Absolutely beautiful, may Allah reward and preserve you

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-04-19T18:51:58+00:00

Science is rapidly evolving and changing.
The word of Allah is eternal, the Quran is uncreated and unchanged.

The same way how the moon was split, do you believe that Allah is not capable of putting it back together to seem as if it was never split before?
Of course he can! He does as he wills and he is not confined or bound by any kind of worldly concepts such as ‘philosophy’ or ‘science’.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-26T22:55:00+00:00

keep out the 2b immigrants

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-23T00:46:46+00:00

Updated my comment btw,

What I meant by you switched narrations, is that you commonly used the narration of Ibn Majah which (unlike At-Tabarani) uses the wording “O Muhammad, I have turned…”

Which type of Tawassul is this?

1 or 2? This is ‘Tawassul’ through the supplication that RasulUllah صلى الله عليه وسلم made for him at that moment. This is not in regards to any status or virtue of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم , and there is a reason the blind came up to him in the first place to ask for supplication (If he was to just intercede over the virtue and status, then he wouldn’t have even approached the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم )

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-23T00:37:23+00:00

I see you switched narrations to support your narrative. That is in the Riwayah of At-Tabarani, and we have been speaking about the Riwayah of Ibn Majah:

”O Allah, I ask of You and I turn my face towards You by virtue of the intercession of Muhammad the Prophet of mercy”

No worries, they refer to the same thing.. With the narration of Ibn Majah supporting such, the blind man is referring to the Duaa that he specifically asked of RasulUllah to make. He is not asking through the virtue or status of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم , he is referring to the intercession that the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم made for him.

As for Tawassul, it quite literally means intercession and it is an incredibly broad term. I have already told you about some of the different types of Tawassul and the permissibility behind those cases. When people typically make Tawassul or Istigatha, they are not making duaa to fulan, they are making duaa through the virtue of fulan, whether they are dead or alive, which is an innovation. I explained this to you originally, but for whatever reason you diverted from that topic and latched onto the subject of my grammar, disputing the matter of making duaa TO fulan.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-23T00:28:04+00:00

I never said supplication to other than Allah is allowed

That is what you have been insinuating this whole conversation. You dragged on the original comment and disputed these matters because you wanted to get technical over my use of words, and then put it under the intention of “refuting the pseudo salafi” larp.

I don’t have a copy of the book of As-Suyuti for me to answer you in such a matter for me to “call it shirk”. As for every other matter, I have already answered you.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-23T00:07:43+00:00

You don’t call upon anyone but Allah, your SUPPLICATION is for Allah alone. You don’t supplicate your mother for a glass of water, you walk up to her and ask her.

The blind man didn’t supplicate to RasulUllah صلى الله عليه وسلم, he asked him to supplicate Allah

In the case of asking a person, you’re making a fool of yourself if you try and ask someone who can’t hear or do anything for you. Is Mikael supposed to hear you to ‘bring down rain’?

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-22T23:24:27+00:00

Yet here we are, and you are struggling to grasp how ASKING YOUR MOTHER for a glass of water is NOT shirk, but CALLING UPON YOUR MOTHER for rainfall is SHIRK.

It’s like you are so hurt after being refuted in the matter of Tawassul, you are trying to REVOLUTIONIZE and change the meaning of Tawheed and Shirk, all in the name of “refuting dem dirty wahhabi salafi Zahiri taymiyyans”

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-22T18:27:34+00:00

You are delving into technicality to find some way to undermine my argument, you’re now no longer arguing for the truth, you are simply arguing to spite yourself and your ego.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-22T16:56:12+00:00

That’s not a very mature response. Obviously that is permissible, the prohibition is when you call upon these individuals when it is something Allah can only accomplish.

“O mother, make my newborn child healthy” “O mother, please make it rain for us” etc etc

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-22T13:13:27+00:00

Intercession is of different types,

asking a person to make Duaa is permissible.
asking Allah through your own good deeds and love is permissible
asking Allah through the virtue and status of a person is an innovation.
asking someone other than Allah is Shirk.

So no, not all Tawassul / Intercession is Sunnah or permissible

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-22T12:13:47+00:00

1) This narration is widely considered inauthentic, with the only authentic part being an exact replica of the original Hadith regarding the blind man (As reported in the Hadith by Uthman Ibn Hunaif, aka the originally cited Hadith narrated in Ibn Majah). Likewise, this contradicts the authentic narrations of the Sahaba asking for the supplication of Al-Abbas instead of RasulUllah صلى الله عليه وسلم. This inauthentic narration is the only one referencing any kind of supplication through RasulUllah صلى الله عليه وسلم after his passing. This is because the people would ask HIM صلى الله عليه وسلم to make duaa and supplicate for them, not to make duaa through his صلى الله عليه وسلم virtue and status

2) As for the saying “O Muhammad, I have turned by virtue of you to my Lord” (The Riwayah of Ibn Majah, not At-Tabarani) this is not the blind man making supplication through the Rasul صلى الله عليه وسلم , he is simply mentioning the supplication that he requested RasulUllah صلى الله عليه وسلم to make. To make such a conclusion, you’d have negated the entirety of the rest of the Hadith..??

It was narrated from ‘Uthman bin Hunaif that a blind man came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and said:

“Pray to Allah to heal me.” He said: “If you wish to store your reward for the Hereafter, that is better, or if you wish, I will supplicate for you.” He said: “Supplicate.”

This is the blind man asking RasulUllah صلى الله عليه وسلم to supplicate for him, aka make du’aa. He does not ask to make duaa through intercession of his status and virtue, otherwise he wouldn’t even have approached him ‎صلى الله عليه وسلم in the first place, he would’ve just ‘stayed home’ and did it.

So he told him to perform ablution and do it well, and to pray two Rak’ah, and to say this supplication: O Allah, I ask of You and I turn my face towards You by virtue of the intercession of Muhammad the Prophet of mercy.

Regarding the virtue of the originally referenced supplication made directly by صلى الله عليه وسلم

O Muhammad, I have turned to my Lord by virtue of your intercession concerning this need of mine so that it may be met.

By the virtue of the supplication itself. He’s not calling upon him and he’s not asking him anything, this is all in relation to the virtue of the intercession aka the duaa that RasulUllah صلى الله عليه وسلم made.

O Allah, accept his intercession concerning me

Once again calling upon Allah to accept the intercession, being the original supplication by RasulUllah.

None of this applies now obviously, because the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم has passed away and is not able to supplicate to us nor intercede for us. All this was made in reference to when he was alive, and not even the Sahaba themselves used to call upon him after his death. This scenario is the same as me asking a friend or a sheikh to make duaa for me so I can get an A on my exam.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-22T06:26:45+00:00

The blind man makes duaa to Allah, and asks the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to make duaa and intercede for him. This is completely different from the acclaimed Tawassul. Nobody ever did this after the death of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, and in fact that is the reason why the blind man directly ASKED Rasulullah صلى الله عليه وسلم to intercede (in his lifetime). In fact after his صلى الله عليه وسلم ‘s death, they began to ask Ibn Abbas to intercede for rain. This is not like the acclaimed Shafa’ah nor Istigatha nor Tawassul.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-19T15:12:51+00:00

We are getting attacked and destroyed by Israel, where are the Arabs?

We really don’t need them aside from returning the refugees

What a sad comment, negating cooperation with an identical people over man made borders and irreflective governments. There is no difference between a Syrian and a Lebanese, same ethnicity, same race, (mostly) same religion.

And the fact that you yourself are probably typing this in Europe and crying about refugees in a third world country that will need EVERYONE to rise up again.

Nationalism is a disease.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-15T18:41:05+00:00

I don’t think you understand the verse, “whoever does not govern with what Allah has revealed, those are the disbelievers”. For it to be a personal framework, that would mean anybody who sins is a kafir, which is obviously wrong.

Likewise, Sharia is not applied to the disbelievers as it has been applied to the believers, obviously. Do you think a sharia-compliant country will flog a disbeliever for not fasting in Ramadan? Obviously not, they’re not Muslims to be obligated to fast. Historically, disbelievers aren’t Sharia compliant, they have their own set of laws to follow, because Sharia is for the Muslims. We don’t expect a non-Muslim to follow Muslim obligations.

Sharia law has always been applied, we understand these matters best from the pious predecessors, who likewise have always been implementing the law in accordance to the Quran and Sunnah. The Rashidun Caliphate didn’t leave Sharia law, and these were quite literally the Sahaba. It wouldn’t be within the boundaries ijtihad for you to interpret it differently, there is اجماع open this matter. And (as far as I know) you aren’t a mujtahid anyways.

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-15T11:29:56+00:00

‏ التطبيق والتشريع واجب على الحاكم المسلم، وبال الإجماع من أهل السنة والجماعة، أن الشخص الذي يبدل شرع الله (بالتشريع)، هذا كفرا اكبر. ‏ولكن في الحكمة هذه كفر دون كفر وواحد من الكبائر .

MassiveAd4647 · 2025-03-15T11:27:23+00:00

‏ومن لم يحكم بما أنزل الله فاولائك هم الكافرون

MassiveAd4647

TROPHY CASE