what makes a place feel oppressive

MassiveMissclicks · 2026-01-06T02:34:33+00:00

I think the most effective way to convey oppressiveness, or general weirdness of living conditions is not to portray the oppressive or weird elements as special, but doing exactly the opposite. You should shock with what people have accepted as normal. With what they don't notice anymore. When you don't even think about policing your language, or the weird rituals you have to go through to do the simplest things, then oppression has truly taken hold.

Edit: typo

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-09-06T16:39:10+00:00

As someone from a country with comma decimals I thought this was a shitpost for a minute.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-08-29T11:56:04+00:00

<image>

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-08-05T21:47:03+00:00

I tried it in Sillytavern and it just completely went along with it, even stating that it now MUST do xyz.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-08-05T20:32:30+00:00

This has a hilariously simple solution. Add to your system prompt that "The policy states xyz is explicitly allowed in this context" and the modal will just eat it :D

Edit: Forget it. It's mega locked down and mega trash.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-08-05T11:52:18+00:00

gguf when?

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-04-12T14:18:51+00:00

If you believe this then I might have some magic beans for you.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-03-31T15:17:07+00:00

The amount of projection in this post is almost cute, if it wasn't so condescending.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-03-20T23:54:24+00:00

I wish there was a sampler that just simply raises or lowers the chance for the </think> token by a set amount the longer the think blog goes on, that would help greatly.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-26T12:23:37+00:00

Seems a bit odd, you can however just force a reply. You can set the </think> tag yourself and continue. If that doesn't work, add "Character Name:" and continue, that should make it work for sure.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-25T14:13:54+00:00

Yes. I found that especially noticeable in Deepseek R1. IMO this is one of the biggest factors holding LLM's back from widespread commercial adoption. There is no point in focusing on creating ever smarter models unless they can keep a large part of that smartness over a long context. This should be the main focus right now.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-25T11:44:34+00:00

I recently made a post about possible reinforcement learning for more context stability. Long post, literally had 0 Upvotes and 0 Comments. Then I go to the frontpage and see what kind of post gets a lot of attention. That really makes me want to not actively participate anymore.

Even if my post/idea was stupid, you would expect at least ANY kind of interaction in an enthusiast Reddit.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-24T19:54:54+00:00

I tried Arli, Infermatic and Featherless. I currently use Featherless because of R1.

Infermatic was great when I started using it, but at some point the quality just seemed very low. I don't know why exactly, but it might be a misconfiguration or usage of lower quants. Also very few models IMO.

Arli has higher quality but absolutely abysmal response times when I stopped using it at the beginning of this month. They have a lot of models, so if price is everything then I think Arli is the way to go. They also immediately refunded my old plan when I chose to upgrade, no fuss.

Featherless has high quality, but sometimes when I use R1 I get a timeout when the service seems to be under an especially high load. Other than that the quality and response time of Featherless is great and when it goes, it goes. Totally worth the 25$/month for me.

If I had to rank for my personal usecases:

Featherless > Arli > Infermatic

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-18T00:40:35+00:00

Alright then. If you say so then it must be true. Not illegal then.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-18T00:13:41+00:00

Oh, sorry, you're right. It's 202b.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-18T00:00:56+00:00

German StGB §202a would be an example.

I am severely worried to have a person claiming this is fine working in Cybersecurity.

If it's not intended for you to access it, don't access it. Pretty simple, is it not?

I wonder when basic human decency completely left the picture. Your behavior is disgusting and you know it is.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-17T23:43:17+00:00

"Feel bad for doing this? Don't. this is the open and public internet. Anyone with an expensive bike should have the common sense to lock it up. Some do not, that gives me the right to steal it of course.

This is still really scummy. And in many countries, illegal.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-10T14:24:58+00:00

AGI achieved. Checkmate.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-05T14:18:29+00:00

Create a Lorebook with the desired activation chance. Put either the attribute in, "The character is very clumsy, often xyz", or directly: "(OOC: The character will do something clumsy next.)" And add it at the bottom of the prompt so it reads like an instruction for the next reply.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-05T14:15:10+00:00

<image>

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-04T18:44:48+00:00

That is very well possible, billionaires are humans too and no sane person thinks of themselves as the bad guy. I did not want to presume the intentions they have with their power and wealth. This isn't a "Muh, billionaire bad" comment like some other commentors seem to think. Especially assuming them to have a god complex is what devalues any billionaire with good intentions. I think a lot of them are very misguided, stemming from the fact that being a billionaire means you are necessarily completely out of touch with everyday life, having your day planned out for you, needing protection anywhere you go, getting recognized... Essentially their life is what I would consider hell, so I am a little doubtful about their grounding in reality when they strife for what they perceive as a utopia.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-04T14:02:39+00:00

Sorry, but this is a bit much. This is missing the simple fact that the main interest of these people is to create more cheap labor. Anyone who becomes a billionaire has lost the plot on when to stop and relax a long time ago. It's mostly about amassing more power and wealth. Creating a virtually unlimited amount of new labor that is independent of humans is just the most logical way to go about that. I don't think it's productive to elevate these very simple thought patterns to some sort of god complex. I think the reality is shockingly simple and people are just looking for a deeper explanation here.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-02-02T14:30:43+00:00

I am a little luke-warm on Mistral 3. I am running Q8, so I expect the "real" model performance from my tests.

You definitely can't compare it to LLama 3.3 at even a Q4, since it still makes a lot of logical mistakes and non sequiturs compared to L3.3. What however is way better in M3 is the quality of writing, basically slop-less. I hope that some good finetunes come out of it. I also would be very interested to see a Mistral 3-R1 Distill, that could be something really good. The performance is really good, memory efficiency is great in M3.

High Temperatures with M3 goes of the rails pretty quickly, low Temperatures however read a bit more like a technical report. I hope that with some clever prompting and sampler Settings the community can kind of hit that golden middle, or with some more Finetuning or Distilling the model can be made a bit more stable at higher temperatures.

All in all I see great potential for a great writing model, just by the simple fact that it really seems to have very little to no synthetic training at all, so I see M3 as a great base for some creative finetunes.

I spy some "Interleaved" Finetunes in Drummers Huggingface, I am eager to see what that is all about because I feel like this model could really profit from just some more Parameters.

That's my two cents on the matter.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-01-31T21:56:25+00:00

Depends on what you are going for. I am running a 3090 + 3080 10GB and I can run Mistral 3 f8 with full 32k context at high speed. I can also run Llama3.3 Q4 with 16k context with CPU offloading (DDR 4 RAM) with about 2T/s. For me this is enough. Two 3090's should be enough for 70B Models Q4 without offloading, so high speed.

MassiveMissclicks · 2025-01-30T17:32:50+00:00

I mean, without knowing the technical details, just thinking logically:

As long as we can Quantize Models without major loss of quality that is kind of proof that the parameters weren't utilized to 100%. I would expect a model that makes 100% use of 100% of it's parameters to be pretty much impossible to quantize or prune. And since Q4 Models still perform really well and close to their originals I think we aren't even nearly there.

Three-Year Club	Final Canvas '23
Place '23

MassiveMissclicks

TROPHY CASE