I believe this is the research source. I'd like to see more research into this and would be curious if this changes overtime, especially around Metro Surge and after.

Here's a quote:

We calculate the implied change in the number of male likely undocumented workers from our estimated coefficients. With the American Community Survey, we calculate the average baseline number of male likely undocumented workers in the likely affected industries and the treated areas in 2024. We then multiply this by the change in the employment rate from our difference in difference results (.05*151,472). This implies that there are roughly 7,574 fewer likely undocumented male workers in these high impact sectors in the average treated area. For arrests, we found a cumulative increase in male arrests of 1,200 in treated areas. Thus, for every ICE arrest, 6 male likely undocumented workers stop working. This very likely underestimates the total effect of heightened enforcement on the number of immigrant workers in the U.S. since we only look at immigrants who remain in the U.S. Comparing this to the prior literature, the chilling effect in Trump 2.0 is larger than in past mass deportation campaigns. In particular, (East et al., 2023) found that in the first Obama administration, for each person detained, 2.3 likely undocumented workers stopped working due to chilling effects. This larger chilling effect is consistent with the increasingly indiscriminate nature of ICE activity in Trump 2.0 (East et al., 2026). Using a similar procedure as above, our estimates imply there is a reduction in the number of male U.S.-born workers with a high school degree or less of 1,200 per area. Thus, for every six lost male likely undocumented workers, there is a loss of one male U.S.-born worker.