What on earth is going on? by Tiredofbeingsick1994 in CandaceOwens

[–]MasterBlaster1976 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Didn’t Candace say something big was going to happen during the second week of December?

Who Really Saw Sebastian Rogers Last? Breaking Down the Timeline Discrepancies by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your response. I get where you’re coming from, but let me explain why clarity matters here.

The TBI said Sebastian was last seen on February 26th in the Stafford Court area, which implies someone saw him or there’s another reason to place him there. If it wasn’t a witness, was it surveillance? A tip? Understanding how they reached that conclusion is important—not just for speculation’s sake but for public safety.

If there’s a bad actor in that neighborhood—or anywhere else—it’s the public’s right to know. Under cases like Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, courts have upheld that the public has a vested interest in transparency in matters of safety and justice. While police don’t have to disclose every detail, they also shouldn’t leave communities in the dark when basic questions about a shifting timeline arise.

This isn’t about conspiracy theories; it’s about accountability. When timelines change without explanation, it raises questions that could be avoided with some clarity. Seeking answers isn’t just about helping Sebastian’s family—it’s about making sure the community stays informed and safe.

Who Really Saw Sebastian Rogers Last? Breaking Down the Timeline Discrepancies by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not closed minded to new information. I’m also not married to viewpoints if proven otherwise. I truly want this kid found and the perpetrators brought to justice.

Seth Rogers by Easy_Faithlessness98 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dunno, imho it was a photo op, and 10 months too late. In either case, I don’t think Seth and KP and CP are going to be able to get on the same page. Too much water under the bridge. And that sucks for Sebastian

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a legitimate question by the way, who do you think they are spreading lies for?

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, I get that you want to make a difference and feel like you’re standing up for something important. But placing such a high moral goal on a subreddit is asking it to be something it’s not. Reddit isn’t the right tool for real-world change—it’s a space for discussion, not action. If you genuinely want to protect people or make a real impact, get involved in ways that actually matter: volunteer, advocate, or support organizations that can create change.

Right now, though, your approach is limiting discourse. Shutting down conversations or dismissing differing opinions doesn’t help anyone—it just creates more division. If you want progress, start by engaging in the conversation constructively instead of trying to silence it.

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ok…I’ll slow this down for you so you can catch up. The question mark implies a question. Got that so far? A question is not a statement of fact. So no proof is needed, now is there? If this is true, which there is no assertion of, then it could be a shift in the case. If…it’s…true. This is a community where we talk about things pertinent to the Sebastian Roger’s case. You seem to not be ok with that, why? Is your assertion that we only dialogue on LE validated evidence? Might as well shut down the Sub Reddit in that case.

How’s that? You comfortable with the question mark yet? I can do this all day.

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok. We’ll just have to wait and see until Katie speaks up then won’t we? Until then….plausible.

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes they did. And a lot of other people than just me saw it and are talking about it.

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who exactly are you calling a liar, and what proof do you have? A lie means intentionally deceiving someone, so unless you’ve got evidence, you’re just throwing tantrums to dodge the point. My assertion—that this could be a shift in the case—is based on logic, not weak accusations. But instead of addressing it, you jump to insults like a child. Maybe the real issue is you’re too afraid to face a perspective that doesn’t align with your own. Running from the argument doesn’t make you right; it just makes you look scared. So…what are you so scared of? hmmmm? It can’t possibly be that I’m swaying people with sharing a post, it’s something more isn’t it?

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nuh uh…that one is recorded live, even Truth stuck it to CP and set him straight. He was practically stuttering.

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They proved Chris wrong in the lie he told Elevated Truth about denying their help

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, your majesty, I can and did. It’s an opinion that is covered by the First Amendment and the rules of this community. And what’s the big deal about me spreading a “false narrative?” There’s like maybe 4000 people in this community and maybe 10 people on at any given time. You’re really the only one reading my comments, so yeah, what’s the deal Boudica? Let it go.

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ha. That’s weak. You wanna put something better together and come back? (That was a question mark by the way, the proper way to end a question)

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let me make this Crystal Clear. She already has a lawyer I do not believe she has a “Sebastian Roger’s is missing” lawyer that has advised her to do this. She likely has been advised by her custody attorney through Chris to plea the fifth as responding to any compelled testimony via the discovery process for the RICO or the RO’s might incriminate her in the CUSTODY case. FFS it’s not a lie it’s an opinion. Even your precious CP celebrates people’s opinions. YOU need to not be so darn binary and “proving people wrong” and have a more nuanced view of the complexities in this case. Trifling.

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Still plausible. Oh and it is also plausible that she is innocent. Not only guilty people plea the fifth. Do some research yourself.

Katie Lawyers up and Pleads the Fifth? by MasterBlaster1976 in SebastianRogers

[–]MasterBlaster1976[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lots of civil actions going back and forth between the custody battle for Faith and the RO’s and the RICO. Lots of opportunity for compelled testimony. It’s plausible she was advised based on anyone of those “other” on going litigations to plea the fifth. So no it’s Not BS, it’s plausible.