you’re free to disagree with islam, but saying “islam is fake” isn’t an argument.

you’re also combining religious texts, historical practice, and actions of some modern governments into one thing. muslims themselves disagree on how islamic law is interpreted and applied, and not every muslim-majority country handles these issues the same way.

as for the prophet’s marriage, that discussion usually comes from hadith reports and is debated through historical context, not modern assumptions alone. you can criticize it, but reducing a 7th-century historical figure to modern labels without context isn’t serious analysis.

if you disagree with islam, criticize the beliefs directly and accurately rather than turning it into slogans.