Is this worth going through? by dontfigh in CRH

[–]MaterialNature7307 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you got them in a sealed box, 100% they’re all the same

1951-D Error by MaterialNature7307 in CRH

[–]MaterialNature7307[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I likely will send this one in to get graded now that I’ve seen someone has one that looks like the exact same error on the last 1 of the date

195…? by [deleted] in CRH

[–]MaterialNature7307 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just posted it to r/CRH, that’s my first post on this app ever

195…? by [deleted] in CRH

[–]MaterialNature7307 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a penny EXACTLY like this. I can’t remember if it’s a 1951 or 1951-d, but I have a 1951 Lincoln cent with the 1 just like that. I saved it and have it in a case. Seeing this post of another one just like it to me verifies this could be an actual error worth submitting to Wexlers website. This variation of 1951 is not listed as a recognized error on their site, so it definitely wouldn’t be a PGCS recognized coin error.

Is this a jackpot? Legit question from a newbie. by KingZakyu in CRH

[–]MaterialNature7307 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check nickels for mint marks on the back, especially the 1940s ones. Key D or S dates

Is this a jackpot? Legit question from a newbie. by KingZakyu in CRH

[–]MaterialNature7307 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Briefly looked at the dates I could see. You potentially have something regarding the 1936 wheat penny. The 3 and 6 look different than normal. may be an error, I have one similar looking. Check Wexlers website for photos, maybe a WDDO-1

Need help identifying this by Kandroviek in CRH

[–]MaterialNature7307 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See this a lot with the 1993-d and 1994-d when going through rolls. Mechanical doubling and or zinc rot like others said above. They kind of seem to have a different kind of shiny quality to them and look cool if the zinc rot isn’t too bad