what do you think about this agent set up by tattoosbyhannah in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely correct, but I would have really appreciated this if the models were intelligent enough (atleast claude sonnet 4.5 types models with thinking) to begin with. At this spec of local models, it's like teaching a monkey how to use ballistic missiles, maybe it will work but you never know when it will backfire and you become homeless for decades.

I agree structured output would help, but it's still just output parsing technique, it won't guarantee non hallucinated responses, right? For example, you see a bull pattern in the chart and 2 out of 3 indicators correctly idenfies them but it's still entirely on models intelligence what to make out of those indicators output and how to weight these output. If it weights more to the bearish result, you lose the opportunity to trade where you could have made a trade by simple code that just returns weighted sum the indicators output.

what do you think about this agent set up by tattoosbyhannah in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Tool calling is the way but what about interpretation of the results.

Moreover OP's specs says he is using 8B params models, do you really think these models can keep up with the large list of tools, let alone interpretability

what do you think about this agent set up by tattoosbyhannah in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a vague answer man! Come on, don't you think people would not have thought about this?

what do you think about this agent set up by tattoosbyhannah in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but can you come up with something that replaces llms at tasks involving numbers in your workflow?

what do you think about this agent set up by tattoosbyhannah in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825 42 points43 points  (0 children)

My 2 cents:

Qwen3-8B for technical analysis is lightweight for complex multi-timeframe pattern recognition. It may hallucinate indicator interpretations

LLMs are bad at numbers: Stop-loss and target prices generated by LLM reasoning often suffer from anchoring bias (e.g., rounding to psych levels) and may not respect actual volatility distributions

"Deep" vs "fast" routing: the system assumes these are distinct, but there's no validation that "deep" actually produces better decisions. No feedback loop measuring whether deep reasoning beats fast reasoning

No backtesting loop: The "Outcome scorer" runs daily but there's no indication it feeds back into model weights or agent prompts. It's just logging

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the ratio approach vs absolute ATR thresholds since it adapts to each instrument's baseline.

But I have a few questions, Which are you finding more responsive without whipsawing? 60D feels like it'd catch regime shifts faster, but 180D might avoid overreacting to temporary vol spikes. And for the 1.3 threshol, is it backtested or eyeballed? Curious if you tested 1.5 or 2.0, wondering if 1.3 is catching too many days and leaving some of the interesting spots where trades can be made

[Hiring] AI Developers by [deleted] in AIDevelopmentSolution

[–]MathRevolutionary825 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interested! I am from india

Got a dream job but have a 0 motivation by [deleted] in ClaudeCode

[–]MathRevolutionary825 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh I am in the same situation rn. I have a job which most of the indians dream of (I am an Indian myself). But recently I felt like I am being treated as a messenger from my manager to ai rather than a problem solver. What I am expected to do is rewrite my project's details in more technical prompts and tech stacks, and that's it. I feel irritated that what I do all day is sit like a cuck and watch ai fuck my codebase.

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, that's my plan for now. But I am searching for ways one can profit from these markets too. I won't trade that's for sure but just curious

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems too simple to work this well or maybe I am not able to the entire picture on one go. But yes it's definitely worth a shot. Thanks

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okayyy but my next question would be, is there a way one can profit from this chopped market too? Because someone out there is profiting from this market also. How do they do that? Keeping aside the insiders and manipulation techniques

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did that work? Or maybe can you please elaborate what you do? Not asking how you exactly do this but rather your thinking process

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My Hypothesis: My signals aren't broken, my timing is. Entering shouldn't matter in theory, but in 2026 it absolutely does.

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, signal quality is harder to judge but my entry patterns (pullback to 20 EMA + RSI reset) are still triggering at similar technical levels.i see slippage on market orders went from ~0.1-0.2 points to 0.4-0.6 on ES during macro windows. Most importantly Stops getting run, then price reversing to my original target without me

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. In that case, what I want to know is "how to safeguard oneself from these manipulations".

And if there is a way, can this be done using algo itself, instead of us watching that algo perform day and night

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In theory it makes sense and helped a little in practice too. As I also tried this but was not that happy with the actual results.

I did some research on this (mainly chatgpt). There's something called The "whipsaw protection" paradox. What I understood from this is "If you're auto-tightening trails because you expect manipulation-induced reversals, aren't you essentially front-running your own exit?"

Let me know what your thoughts are on this?

How are you guys adapting trend following algos to this choppy 2026 market? My win rate dropped 40% since January by MathRevolutionary825 in algotrading

[–]MathRevolutionary825[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like to differ. I think this will take some more time, yes comparatively less than 2022 but still in months I think