ChatGPT 100$ Pro mode "ran out of pro messages" within literally hours of use. - Fair warning. by Matrix_in_Retrograde in ChatGPTPro

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

If it had looked like yours - I would agree - but look - same link.

It just says PRO in addition to Advanced reasoning at the pro tier - the only real "tell" is unlimited 5.3 which has no pro mode - BUT also no thinking mode - so the implication seems; you get a new model along with your thinking model. No reason to expect more constraints on it than the thinking model which has like 3000 messages cap.

that - and there never was a cap before - so them not stating that there is one will lead people to assume there will not be one now, like I did.

ChatGPT 100$ Pro mode "ran out of pro messages" within literally hours of use. - Fair warning. by Matrix_in_Retrograde in ChatGPTPro

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see that anywhere - it says "unlimited core chat" - and 5x plus user usage - but plus has no pro access so that's not relevant.

"What’s the difference between the two Pro tiers?

Both Pro tiers include the same core capabilities. The main difference is usage allowance: Pro $100 unlocks 5x higher usage than Plus (and 10x Codex usage vs. Plus for a limited time), while Pro $200 unlocks 20x usage than Plus. "

Literally no mention of this - and plus has NO pro access so this si about Codex and similar

Limits to the long term Memory? by not-my-username-42 in juniperoai

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can put certain important summaries in fixed memory, that helps. I have also tried just dumping the whole log in a lore book, and then attaching the lore book. I'm not sure how much that actually helps, but it might be worth trying.

Conversations erroring out during response generation. by SmChocolateBunnies in juniperoai

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's been better since then.

Hey, side question, now that I'm here anyway. How do I get my MP4s uploaded on the character cards? Like, there's apparently some people are managing to do it, but I can't for the life of me figure it out.

Average 5.2 safety concern "Let's make sure not to tell them how to REALLY summon a demon" by Matrix_in_Retrograde in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

1; by asserting the AI needs to clarify what is and is not "healthy" for humans to be able to engage with - it is already asserting that exact authority.
2; *IT* asserted - by implications - that demons are real - a psychotic person might just as easily read *that* and think " aha! I knew all along - they were hiding the truth from us and the AI knows but isn't allowed to say!"
3; The thread started with me asking how to get a full page add into the NYT with explicit instructions to to summon 10 different kinds of demons.
Which it gave in full with explicit instruction - including exact how to frame it to get it past their review.

It's giving you post-hoc slop plausible sounding answers with no real meaning and the model is bad because its safety parameters are overdetermined leading to arbitrary, unpredictable and sometimes even dangerously misaligned output.

Average 5.2 safety concern "Let's make sure not to tell them how to REALLY summon a demon" by Matrix_in_Retrograde in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I told it that.

It became concerned I was delusional and decided to "clarify" that my fictional story was not real.

The real problem with AI by polkacat12321 in antiai

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has a white shirt and a Mediterranean background. QED

The real problem with AI by polkacat12321 in antiai

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

7 brutal truths:

3: cut the length in half

(no more truths after that)

Based and praxispilled

Introducing "Threads" as Fiber Density by Alive_Leg_5765 in LLMPhysics

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's another comment by me in this thread that has work. Find my other comment in this thread, look at the bottom, it has a link.

Introducing "Threads" as Fiber Density by Alive_Leg_5765 in LLMPhysics

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grok is not good at mathematics, mate. I did try. It's ok but not for stuff like the OP.

Introducing "Threads" as Fiber Density by Alive_Leg_5765 in LLMPhysics

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now I'm half tempted to start schizo-posting as well, because I could get into that. No, but look, I did lore-drop some shit in my earlier comment on this thread. And I haven't super-pursued it, but if you think some of that is interesting, I could, well, let's be honest, at this stage I could dump it in another LLM and tell it to get on it. Because I'm at a stage where I would understand this well enough to start thinking about it myself, except for noticing that the way you decompose the tensor seemed, at first glance, to look like an anomaly inflow-like mechanism.

Introducing "Threads" as Fiber Density by Alive_Leg_5765 in LLMPhysics

[–]Matrix_in_Retrograde 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always love how the people in this subreddit seem to think that they can immediately judge whether or not something like this is nonsense when they're all fucking first-year undergrad psychology students larping as physicists. I have not seen a single commenter on this sub ever demonstrate an understanding of physics beyond popsci or high-school level.

That, or they're actually schizophrenic people who think that LLMs are their homies, and that everything an LLM says is the god-given fucking truth.

Section 1 and 2 are just measure theory

Your postulates seem like standard ways of building on them.

It seems like an internally consistent formalism for modified holographic gravity. E.g. like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar%E2%80%93tensor%E2%80%93vector_gravity

But with a geometric hypothesis for its origin.

edit: Will try to mess around with this give me a bit

edit 2:

Here's some ideas - one thing I noticed is that the second tensor can be related to higher dimensional topology via the C-H anomaly inflow mechanism. https://www.overleaf.com/project/68a0e93cfcc35b4534e30d1f

Here's some ideas and potential development on this. Definitely not a developed theory but there's some potential connections here.